Propaganda Man said:
Bulerias said:
Propaganda Man said:
Bulerias said:
Propaganda Man said:
TwilightKing said:
ZELDAFREAK104 said:
Great, now I'll have to pay to use nintendo's crappy online.
If they get rid of freind codes and have actual voice chat, I might pay.
How do you know it's going to be crappy if we know nothing of the content we will be getting yet! Who knows, friend codes could be gone and we could get voice chat with this, but I wouldn't call it crap until we know more.
Do you think there is a good chance of that?
The fact that Nintendo's charging money now means that YES, things are changing. Hence, there's always a chance.
I don't see why you feel the need to count out Nintendo. As I mentioned, they pioneered online in the future... it's not like they're behind the competition in any real way. They just choose not to do the things the others do.
Perhaps that's changing.
Did you know gullible isn't in the dictionary?
The reason they want us to pay is in order to get more money. Nintendo is a company, not a God.
Where did I call them a God? I just said,
they need to justify the new paid service somehow. After all, then, why keep the free service?
Obviously because the paid one will have features the free one will not. Use common sense.
I never claimed you said they were a God nor did I imply that.
You are also basically saying that they will justify the paid service by getting closer to Live but not beating it.
Are you purposely trying to look like an idiot?
I NEVER SAID THEY WILL NOT BEAT LIVE. Dude, I don't see how you want a serious discussion board. You're not able to discuss this properly, let alone politics.
I said that BETTER FEATURES MEAN COMING CLOSER TO LIVE. Or, perhaps, BEATING it. But since we know NEXT TO NOTHING about the paid service and can only make LOGICAL ASSUMPTIONS, I am not saying early on that it will, hands-down, definitely beat Live.