If you say abortion is murder we all know you're just say murder so it sounds scary and horrible.
Fetus≠human
What if they're young and they can't afford a child and don't know how to care for one, that's on them and they should have to go through with the pregnancy just because the chose to "do the do"? What if they're too poor to afford a baby or even homeless and they know they won't be able to provide for one, they should have to go through with it because it's on them since it was a choice they made? Just because you choose have sex does not mean you want or can provide for a child. There shouldn't be a "terms and conditions" for abortions imo, you should be able to get one regardless of your reasons
but I know this girl who CONSTANTLY has sex with her boyfriend, and says if she ever got pregnant that she'd never hesitate to abort, and I think that's just really wrong.
How dare someone enjoy sex but not want a child... woe is me...
Animals are no way equivalent to us, humans are so much more precious and you aren't just removing a fetus from a womb. Even if you do argue that a fetus "removed" during abortion is not a human which I disagree with.(only at the stage when it's usually done in abortion) it's as close as you're going to get to a human and even possibly at the stage where it is no different to a human. You shouldn't even risk it. It's a irreplaceable and unique set of genetics and life in it's early stages. How can you compare to killing an animal and even if you do don't you eat meat right?There's nothing wrong in eating meat. Are you saying it's suddenly not the same thing since the person raising the animals for you to eat is this horrible being smh. Abortion should be a last resort not something to be tossed around and spoken in the same context of eating your "freshly" made hamburger, ugh.I bet most of the people who said that are fine with killing living animals and eating them, by not fine with just 'removing' a fetus from the womb....LiEk
Animals are no way equivalent to us, humans are so much more precious and you aren't just removing a fetus from a womb. Even if you do argue that a fetus "removed" during abortion is not a human which I disagree with.(only at the stage when it's usually done in abortion) it's as close as you're going to get to a human and even possibly at the stage where it is no different to a human. You shouldn't even risk it. It's a irreplaceable and unique set of genetics and life in it's early stages. How can you compare to killing an animal and even if you do don't you eat meat right?There's nothing wrong in eating meat. Are you saying it's suddenly not the same thing since the person raising the animals for you to eat is this horrible being smh. Abortion should be a last resort not something to be tossed around and spoken in the same context of eating your "freshly" made hamburger, ugh.
- - - Post Merge - - -
Have you seen abortion pictures? You can see that especially in later stages that it's a living being not something you can just eradicate from your body. If even one baby is killed by mistake or not, through abortion when it could have lived I believe it's unacceptable. But heck it's not one baby we're talking about that have died undisputably by the process. I've actually talked with an assistant doctor who's witnessed abortion countless times. This isn't evidence or anything at all but how she talked of her job was just gut wrenching. The way she described it and the details of the actual act was disgusting, she felt that it was wrong too not that it even matters.
Basically what I mean is, if you go out and have sex (on purpose) and get pregnant and you want to have an abortion then I guess it's on you, but I just think it's wrong. I'm straying a bit from the topic and I'm not saying everyone is like this because they aren't, but I know this girl who CONSTANTLY has sex with her boyfriend, and says if she ever got pregnant that she'd never hesitate to abort, and I think that's just really wrong. I know couples sometimes don't want kids but if someone like her would go and get pregnant and then immediately abort I honestly just think that's messed up.
And unless I'm wrong, abortions are pretty costly. (but so is giving birth so y'know) Not everyone can afford one so if someone is homeless then that'd be awful for them. I don't think people should be forced to live a life they don't want to, but if it was me, like I said, I wouldn't do it.
Human beings literally defined what the word animal means. Even if you say that animals are humans, humans are the only ones that would categorize themselves to be.And counterpart humans are the only ones that can oppose to the idea of being an animal. We have far superior intelligence reasoning ration and emotions than animals. If you would categorize us in animals we would be Super-Animals. The fact that we can destroy the world like you said should entitle us to being seperate from animals, we're simply superior. I also didn't say that only humans have genes that's stupid. Taking a pill seriously? Not even gonna comment you're only saying that since you would rather state that one than the other. Humans have the right of killing and any other "animal" you speak of when it sustains us, or provides us with something we can use that's where the argument ends unlike abortion. Your 3rd argument I believe life starts at contraception and I'm not going to argue with you about that since we have completely different beliefs and it's not just religion. Legalizing abortion is not a bad thing, it is how there is no restriction there is it on it.Humans are animals, so yes, we are equivalent to animals, because we are animals. Can you explain what makes humans more precious than other animals, is it out ability to mass murder, destroy the world? because honestly humans are ruining the world, so what makes them so precious? You also realise animals have "a irreplaceable and unique set of genetics" too? that's not just reserved for the wonderful precious humans by the way.
Oh yeah, how can you compare taking a pill to remove some unwanted cells from your body (early stages) to hanging an animal upside down, slitting their throat, and leaving them like that until they're drained of blood, only then to go and chop up their body to eat! What a weird comparison right, obviously the first is the worst!
The fetus is not a human, only has the potential to be, I don't know how you can disagree with that. You actually can eradicate a fetus from your body, that's what abortion is. Yes later stage abortion is more of a complicated topic as the the procedure is more dangerous and doctors know that, that is why late stage abortions are not given out very often, and are often used when the mothers life is at risk. Most people that are pregnant and don't want to be will have had an abortion way before it gets to the "later stages" so imo that is a pretty irrelevant argument against abortion as it most definitely isn't the most common abortion method.
You know what else is gut wrenching and disgusting? when women had to go to people who carried out abortions in their homes, without anesthetic, often with serious complications, thousands of women died every year because of this, as they couldn't see a doctor for the complications because they would be put in prison since abortion was illegal. If they couldn't go to someone else (as that often cost thousands, back in the 60s and before) they would do it themselves, using coat-hangers/ any object they think would work. You know why? Because back then, the men in charge decided that they can police what women* do with their bodies, this resulted in thousands of deaths. So legal abortion is 100% a good thing, it stops things like this happening.
I know you're trolling but there are already restrictions on abortion, it's just that it's really loose, I'm saying a tighter one.?? restricting abortion rights is sexist af fite me
I know you're trolling but there are already restrictions on abortion, it's just that it's really loose, I'm saying a tighter one.
Human beings literally defined what the word animal means. Even if you say that animals are humans, humans are the only ones that would categorize themselves to be.And counterpart humans are the only ones that can oppose to the idea of being an animal. We have far superior intelligence reasoning ration and emotions than animals. If you would categorize us in animals we would be Super-Animals. The fact that we can destroy the world like you said should entitle us to being seperate from animals, we're simply superior. I also didn't say that only humans have genes that's stupid. Taking a pill seriously? Not even gonna comment you're only saying that since you would rather state that one than the other. Humans have the right of killing and any other "animal" you speak of when it sustains us, or provides us with something we can use that's where the argument ends unlike abortion. Your 3rd argument I believe life starts at contraception and I'm not going to argue with you about that since we have completely different beliefs and it's not just religion. Legalizing abortion is not a bad thing, it is how there is no restriction there is it on it.
I know you're trolling but there are already restrictions on abortion, it's just that it's really loose, I'm saying a tighter one.
The word animal has multiple definitions one of them is a living organism other than a human being another is what you stated. The definition I was referring to is the 1st one and what I said in the 1st part means that we define what an animal even is. Heck the definition of words even change if we want it to change and a consensus is reached. Our intelligence ration and emotions don't even compare to what my definition of animal was.The first part honestly makes no sense to me? Humans are animals? Abilities, feeling, emotions etc. don't make a living thing more or less an animal? The definition of animal is "a living organism which feeds on organic matter, typically having specialized sense organs and nervous system and able to respond rapidly to stimuli." humans fall in that category, right? I don't see why it matters that humans create words and definitions, you can't just oppose a definition because you're human? I'm not going to go on more about this because it's irrelevant to the discussion anyway.
Yes, taking a pill. Abortion is usually taking pills or getting an injection. So let me get this straight, humans have the right to kill animals when ever they want, even for food when there's other options, but they shouldn't have the right to remove a fetus from their own body?
How should abortions be restricted? There shouldn't be a terms and conditions for abortions, anyone should be able to get one or multiple abortions for whatever reason. +1 to what visibleghost said about abortion restrictions
It all falls at where we believe life begins that's why debates like these never end, since in the end it's your belief and opinion you can't win it with solely facts as even the facts are up to interpretation.I'm guessing you're a male? (Based on your username. Apologies if I'm wrong)
If so you have no right to try to restrict the rights of a woman's body
We're the ones that give birth. Not men