Yes, but no one would describe him as Scottish. He's English. I'm half Scottish but was born and brought up in england so I would never say I'm Scottish. (and I think Scotland is better off in the Uk tbh but that's a debate for another day)
But he's Scottish by blood? I am so confused on this @_@
Stan Lee didn't create Captain America....
Most of his CO creations are also highly up for debate for how much he really contributed. It could have been the whole idea, he could have also just said "I want something to do with a spider" and thrown that vague idea at the other guy to make something of.
Not to mention pretty much all of 'his' famous characters and work have the word 'co' in front of creator. Again, it's debatable how much he's actually done, especially with his reputation for not always being entirely truthful of his input.
This is a man who for the longest time claimed that he was the sole creator of Spider-man....Until he admitted he wasn't. Take everything the guy says with a pinch of salt because it's likely you're not even getting half of the truth.
Hell, the guy wanted a cameo in 'Batman vs Superman'! I mean...What? No, Stan Lee! Stop it!
The guy is fabulous with marketing and Marvel wouldn't be where it is without him from that. His creative input though is highly debatable. He certainly isn't somebody you should be using to represent great American writers when it's debatable to what he actually wrote.
Wow, you've completely misunderstood a lot. Okay, see, the reason why Stan Lee is famous is because he came up with the IDEA for Captain America, Spider-Man, and the X-Men for Marvel. But, yeah, he put them to print with the help of Steve Ditko and Jack Kirby. He was still brilliant for coming up with the ideas and you can't say he wasn't. I mean, look at J.R.R.Tolkien. All he did was rip-off centuries old mythology from around Europe, change it slightly, and set the story in MiddleEarth. Plus, he was a terrible writer. Everyone I've spoken to agrees with me that Tolkien is a terrible writer with good ideas, but really the only idea that was actually his and his alone with the idea to make Elvish an actual language, which was brilliant. But I think he pretty much stabbed all ancient European cultures in the heart when he not only warped their mythology for his own uses, but he used to them to write a story that is a metaphor for Christianity. Does he get any hate?
No, and yet you're sitting here going off on Stan Lee -- one of the most brilliant minds of our lifetimes -- because he pulled the ideas for his characters out of thin air, and then went to his writer and artist friends and said, "Hey, you wanna help me turn this into a comic?" Oh, and, uh, also -- the reason he tends to get more credit than Steve Ditko or Jack Kirby is because those two are both dead! He's the only one alive to take the credit!
Who cares if he wanted a cameo in the movie? It was probably a joke, first of all. Second, he could be a Batman fan, which would make him even more awesome. Not only that but it is entirely likely that he probably knew Bob Kane, was/is a fan of his work, and wanted to be in the movie out of his respect for him.
And, no, no, no, no. NO. I never stated he was a writer just like I never said any of the others were writers. Arthur Miller was actually a playwright. Alfred Hitchcock was a director as was/is Wes Craven. Audrey Hepburn is one of the most iconic actresses of all freaking time. Do you know what Stan Lee has in common with them? They are all famous, iconic AMERICANS that have had a cultural impact on the world!
That is what Stan Lee is representative of in my original post.