Ferguson: Your Thoughts.

Do you believe that Officer Darren Wilson is guilty?

  • Yes

    Votes: 103 64.4%
  • No

    Votes: 31 19.4%
  • I do not know

    Votes: 32 20.0%

  • Total voters
    160
Status
Not open for further replies.
you blindly agree with everything people in authority say? do that mean you agree with the ferguson police too? lol.

when its perfectly sensible, yes

- - - Post Merge - - -

also did you seriously just compare a case of human rights violation, authority abuse, and etc to being nicely asked to not say something online?
 
Last edited:
I'm sure the parents of the dead kids wish the cops would stop shooting unarmed citizens too :/

THIS

My parents are complaining about how Wilson no longer has a job 'and his life is ruined.' Like, please shut up mom and dad. At least he has a LIFE, so many people's lives has been taken for no reason.
 
I'm sure the parents of the dead kids wish the cops would stop shooting unarmed citizens too :/

I feel for the parents. I really do. Hopefully this catastrophe gets resolved soon and the guilty parties are brought to justice.
 
There is always two side's to a story:

I have been watching the news and it has been said that the person who got shot (something Brown) attacked first using his fist. The officer had every right to shoot at him for he was defending himself.

It is really stupid how people in Ferguson are reacting by burning police stations and vandalism. A african-american cop could shoot a white person and I hope that we wouldn't react like how the people in Ferguson are. I to was a little upset but here where I live we riot by singing songs in the downtown part of out state and holding signs.
 
There is always two side's to a story:

I have been watching the news and it has been said that the person who got shot (something Brown) attacked first using his fist. The officer had every right to shoot at him for he was defending himself.

It is really stupid how people in Ferguson are reacting by burning police stations and vandalism. A african-american cop could shoot a white person and I hope that we wouldn't react like how the people in Ferguson are. I to was a little upset but here where I live we riot by singing songs in the downtown part of out state and holding signs.

Didn't he shoot him multiple times though? Sure he has every right to defend himself, but as a police officer, shouldn't he be equipped with the skills to handle something like that without using excessive force?
 
I have been watching the news and it has been said that the person who got shot (something Brown) attacked first using his fist. The officer had every right to shoot at him for he was defending himself.

again, no

officer's as far as I'm aware are meant to be trained to deal with unarmed and violent individuals without having to resort to firearms (especially when they're in clsoe proximity), and if he seriously had to whip out the gun then he was unquestionably a ****ty excuse of a cop
 
Last edited:
i think we're just walking in circles with rehashed opinions and arguments and clearly aren't moving anywhere lol
 
A african-american cop could shoot a white person and I hope that we wouldn't react like how the people in Ferguson are.

People wouldn't react this way because if it was a black cop, he would probably get convicted. No questions asked. :|
Lets not start with "if this" and "if that" though. Lets look at the matter at hand.

- - - Post Merge - - -

i think we're just walking in circles with rehashed opinions and arguments and clearly aren't moving anywhere lol

I agree.
 
Honestly, since self-defense argument has been brought up a lot, I'd like to pose a question to everyone. Though specifically for people that have brought up this argument.

Do you think if someone punched you and your response was shooting them, that you'd get off scot-free?

Now let me follow this up with another question.

Do you think an officer of the law should be above this?

- - - Post Merge - - -

i think we're just walking in circles with rehashed opinions and arguments and clearly aren't moving anywhere lol

Are you just now noticing this?
 
Honestly, since self-defense argument has been brought up a lot, I'd like to pose a question to everyone. Though specifically for people that have brought up this argument.

Do you think if someone punched you and your response was shooting them, that you'd get off scot-free?

He was not simply punched. You're leaving something out.. What if the person violently assaulted you and then tried to grab your gun? would u fear for your life or nah?
this part was confirmed by evidence
if someone was being violent towards me and then tried to take my gun, i would fire it and think "oh poo poo, this person is gonna try to to shoot me"

here r some articles about the forensic evidence. they went all CSI on it.
http://www.npr.org/blogs/thetwo-way/2014/11/25/366575509/ferguson-documents-the-physical-evidence
http://www.washingtonpost.com/polit...38c7b4-5964-11e4-bd61-346aee66ba29_story.html

full list of court transcripts
http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2014/11/25/us/evidence-released-in-michael-brown-case.html

- - - Post Merge - - -

Honestly I'd just appreciate it if you wouldn't man. :(

ok I respect that!\
 
Last edited:
until it's proven that the court hearing wasn't a biased sham, I'm taking everything in it with a grain of salt

and so what if he attempted to grab it? that still doesn't justify murder
 
Basically this for everyone saying "he tried to grab the gun" or something along those lines.

if someone was beating me up and then tried to grab my gun, I would think "oh frick i am about to get shot"
the whole situation is sad. I don't justify any of it, but just being real that would be my reaction too.

- - - Post Merge - - -

until it's proven that the court hearing wasn't a biased sham, I'm taking everything in it with a grain of salt

and so what if he attempted to grab it? that still doesn't justify murder

lol it's innocent until proven guilty, not "guilty until proven innocent" in the USA. how are you going to prove a negative here. we all just believe what we feel emotionally in this case. the court case was about finding evidence, not feelings.
 
lol it's innocent until proven guilty, not "guilty until proven innocent" in the USA. how are you going to prove a negative here. we all just believe what we feel emotionally in this case. the court case was about finding evidence, not feelings.

Because multiple other sources as well as this case's entire history supports that the hearing was biased from the start, and just done to put on a show.

Plus I think there was also things in exactly how the hearing was handled? Though I'll let someone else confirm/deny that if possible.



In which case if this does turn out to be a shame like I think it is, let me also remind you that court hearings are meant to be fair to all involved.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top