• Good evening, everyone! We have an egg hunt announcement! An additional clue for egg #21 will be posted Monday at 6 PM EDT if it hasn't been found by then. The egg hunt will also be extended until Tuesday morning at 10 AM EDT.

Rules and Guidelines Major Update

Status
Not open for further replies.

Jeremy

Not an actual piece of furniture.
Staff
Administrator
Site Owner
Joined
Nov 7, 2004
Posts
30,215
Bells
40,092
Eggs
14
Island
Númenor
Seashore Easter Egg
Fishbowl Easter Egg
Town Tune Easter Egg
Mt. Fuji Easter Egg
Blue Pikmin Easter Egg
Kiki Easter Egg
Rainbow Stained Glass Easter Egg
Starry Night Easter Egg
Starshine Easter Egg
Chrysalis Easter Egg
Introduction

Good evening and happy winter solstice! As previously announced, we have been spending a great deal of time and effort in recent months preparing new rules and guidelines for The Bell Tree. While our old rules page served us well for many years, internal staff discussions and community feedback showed that there was room to improve with clarity, enforcement, and addressing modern issues such as AI-generated content. We're glad to announce that the time has finally come to publish and move forward with this major update. All members are required to follow the rules and guidelines to participate in the community, so please be sure to take time to review the main points. While these new rules are quite elaborate, we've broken them down into multiple pages to help with readability. I'll explain more about how the pages are structured below, as well as point out some of the specific changes that were made.

Before we get started, I also wanted to touch on a few points about leaving feedback. We welcome and appreciate all feedback, so please remember to frame any opinions, questions, or concerns you may have about the rules themselves. This is not the place to bring up issues with other members or make negative remarks about the staff. These rules and guidelines touch on many sensitive topics, such as bullying and discrimination, so we expect everyone to engage in this discussion with compassion and respect. As a community, we need to come together to support an inclusive, safe, supportive, and welcoming environment. We hope these new rules make it easier to continue that mission.

New Rules

The rules are now located in the Help section of the forum and start with a main "Rules & Guidelines" page, which is linked below:

>> Rules & Guidlines <<

Fifteen separate pages in total cover various topics in greater detail, which you can find in the list of pages at the left (on desktop) or top (on mobile). Links to the pages are also referenced throughout the rules, including in the table of contents at the top of the main Rules & Guidelines page.

The Rules tab in the navigation bar at the top of the forum has also been updated so that it links to the new page.

Notable Changes

While all rules have been rewritten from scratch, most have been clarified and elaborated on rather than changed. However, there are some notable changes that I would like to highlight:

Discussions about politics and religion are no longer allowed. I understand and agree with all of the points a few of you made about this change when it was mentioned in the previous thread, so I want to spend some time explaining why we ultimately came to this decision. You may have seen that we went back and forth about this over the last few years, because the number one concern is that we can keep bigoted people out of the community and provide a place that is supportive of marginalized people and groups. Politics often intersects with these topics, especially in recent years. Finding the right balance can be tricky, but we have spent a lot of time considering our goals for the community, evaluating what works and doesn't work in other communities, and designing rules and moderation in a way that allows the community to stand against discrimination without political discussions.

Political and religious discussions were first allowed on TBT around 2008. During this time, forums were the place to discuss and learn about these issues. There was no Discord, YouTube was only a few years old, and social media was still in its infancy. These days, there is an infinite amount of spaces on the internet where politics are discussed openly. It may even be challenging to find a break from it, which was the sentiment shared by the majority of you who responded to our summer survey. We've also seen a shift on the internet over the past decade, with most gaming, entertainment, and hobbyist communities across Discord, Reddit, forums, and wikis choosing to ban political discussions.

The time and effort needed to moderate political discussions is also something that can negatively affect the site. Every opinion about a political issue needs to be properly researched to make an effective decision about the kind of views that should and shouldn't be allowed on the forum. Political content is often not obvious or straightforward. For example, a specific bill, ruling, or candidate could be referenced, requiring moderators to analyze posts in detail. In some cases, topics could also be more nuanced, putting moderators in a difficult position. The amount of time and effort required to do this effectively detracts from the community's purpose. In recent years, some large social media sites, such as Facebook, have addressed these challenges by reducing moderation and allowing nearly all political content on their platform. This is not an approach that the staff have ever considered because The Bell Tree cannot become a platform used to spread hateful views.

For our specific rules about what is and isn't allowed in regards to political content, please be sure to read Policies on Politics & Religion and Policies on Discrimination & Bigotry.

All AI-generated content is now banned. After we made a statement about banning generative AI images from events and The Museum, many of you expressed that this should go even further. For many years, TBT and its community have put a large emphasis on human creativity, and we want that to continue. It was later announced in that thread that we would be banning all generative AI images everywhere on the site. This update codifies that decision into our rules. It also makes it clear that generative AI should not be used to create text for discussion threads. See Policies on AI-Generated Content for more information.

Rules about sexually explicit content have been broadened. This past summer, we had many discussions in the feedback thread about sexually explicit content, what that means, what should and shouldn't be allowed, and how the old rules were designed in regards to this topic. We also addressed this with questions in our summer survey. Going forward, the rules are broader by prohibiting discussions about sexual relationships. This applies to both personal experiences and fictional stories (creative writing, fan fiction, etc.). See Policies on Sexually Explicit Content for more information.

Moderators will consider behavior in related off-site communities. Many off-site platforms are closely associated with TBT and have unfortunately been used for abusive behavior such as harassment, targeting, and bullying. Going forward, we will be more proactive in addressing these issues, even when they don't occur in spaces that we can directly moderate, such as Discord DMs. For more information, see Moderating On- and Off-site Behavior.

Rules related to hacking Animal Crossing have been narrowed. In the past, there has been uncertainty about what we do and don't allow in regards to hacking Animal Crossing. The rules state that trading hacked Animal Crossing items or bells is not allowed. However, you are free to talk about your island being hacked or search for players that use third-party software to play 3DS games online (now that Nintendo has shut down its official service for this). That being said, sharing instructions about how to hack your console is still not allowed for legal reasons. For more information, see Policies on Hacking & Accessing Copyrighted Content.

We may consider making this rule even less strict by having it only apply to the latest released Animal Crossing game. Please feel free to let us know your thoughts about that.

We are implementing a new warning point system. Those of you who are members of other forums using XenForo software may be familiar with warning points. This system works by assigning a different number of points based on the type of warning and the severity of the issue. For example, a member insulting someone could earn their account 10 points, while making a second account could earn 5 points. Once an account's total warning points cross a threshold, the system automatically issues a ban. Points expire after a set amount of time, giving members the chance to improve their behavior and avoid being banned by the system. We currently do something similar by manually evaluating warning history before issuing a ban, but this system makes that process automated, more consistent, and more transparent. Since this is being implemented for the first time on The Bell Tree, we will likely need to adjust points and expiration lengths over the next year while we find the right balance. For more information, see Warnings & Bans.

Finally, while I linked to several pages in this section, there are many more that haven't been mentioned here, so please be sure to check them out directly on the rules page.

Continued Work

While this update is now published, the work is not over! For example, the Accounts section has a newer version that didn't make it into this release. We also plan to improve formatting to help with readability. Some changes may be added this week, while other details will be polished over the next few months. Meanwhile, we'll continue to review the rules and listen to your feedback to see where further changes may be needed.

In Closing...

Thank you for taking the time to read this announcement and, of course, our newly updated rules! Feel free to ask us any questions you may have about them, either in this thread or in the private Contact the Staff board. We look forward to the upcoming year, with our small New Year's event starting this Saturday, the big Animal Crossing update in mid-January, and more changes and happenings in the works that we'll announce when the time comes.
 
@Jeremy I'll be honest. There are certain things that I'm not having a clear understanding. So if you don't mind explaining it to me.

What is bigotry? And I'm not understanding how the warning works. How is Ai a bad thing?
 
@Jeremy I'll be honest. There are certain things that I'm not having a clear understanding. So if you don't mind explaining it to me.

What is bigotry? And I'm not understanding how the warning works. How is Ai a bad thing?
Hopefully I can answer this for you!

What is bigotry?
Bigotry means treating people unfairly or negatively because of certain personal traits, like their race, religion, gender, sexuality, or because they have a disability.

Some examples of bigotry:
  • Mocking someone because they have a disability
  • Saying that all people who share a certain personal trait (such as a specific race or gender) are bad
  • Insulting someone because of their gender or their sexuality

Why is AI considered "bad"?
Artificial intelligence itself isn’t “bad,” but it depends on how it is used. On the forum, our rule is specifically against "generative AI" and "AI-generated content".

Generative AI is artificial intelligence designed to create things like text, images, audio, or video. These generative AI tools are trained using large amounts of work created by humans, like writing and artwork, often without creators' permission. Because of this, AI-generated content is like copying or stealing from other people’s work. This raises lots of concerns about copyright, fairness, and the widespread use of generative AI for commercial purposes, which takes work or opportunities away from real, human creators!

On the forums, we want to see the thoughts and creativity of humans! 😊

The warning system
This could be a bit confusing to explain, but I'll do my best! When a rule is broken, one of three things could happen:
  • Notification / Reminder: Notifications and reminders are for minor or accidental rule-breaking. If a post is in the wrong place, it might be moved. Or, if a post doesn't quite follow the rules, it could be edited or removed. In these cases, you might receive a notification or direct message to let you know. These aren't warnings, and there aren't any "warning points" attached.

  • Warning: A warning is an official notice that a rule was broken. As examples, these could be given for repeated rule-breaking or more serious behaviour, like being very rude to another member. Each warning adds a certain number of "warning points" to your account. If someone reaches a specific number of points, the system will automatically apply a temporary ban.

  • Ban: A ban means someone is not allowed to use the forum. This is more serious and relatively rare. It usually happens only if someone breaks a rule very badly, or they receive many warnings for continued rule-breaking.
As an example of the warning system being used:
Someone insults another member and receives a warning worth 5 points. ➡️ Later, they insult someone again and receive another warning worth 5 points (they have 10 points in total now). ➡️ At 10 warning points in total, the system automatically applies a two-day ban.

Note that this is a new system to The Bell Tree, so it's something that will likely require some adjustment as we go!
 
Nice seeing this finally done!

I didn't read everything yet, although I read a lot.

I have one thing to note for now:
Behavior or content that can give an unfair advantage over others in the community:
Examples: creating alternate accounts, attempting to cheat in events
2-10 points
I feel like specifically making an alt account should warrant 30-40 warning points, because it is very intentional, malicious behaviour - you don't make an alt account "by mistake" or "just because of bad judgement". Not only is it very intentional and unfair, it is also very disrespectful to everyone who is participating (fairly) and goes harshly against the spirit of the events. I'm not sure what other ways there would be to cheat but if it is cut and dry cheating and not something that is up for debate or interpretation, I'd still say that the 30-40 points could be warranted for the exact same reasons.
 
Hopefully I can answer this for you!

What is bigotry?
Bigotry means treating people unfairly or negatively because of certain personal traits, like their race, religion, gender, sexuality, or because they have a disability.

Some examples of bigotry:
  • Mocking someone because they have a disability
  • Saying that all people who share a certain personal trait (such as a specific race or gender) are bad
  • Insulting someone because of their gender or their sexuality

Why is AI considered "bad"?
Artificial intelligence itself isn’t “bad,” but it depends on how it is used. On the forum, our rule is specifically against "generative AI" and "AI-generated content".

Generative AI is artificial intelligence designed to create things like text, images, audio, or video. These generative AI tools are trained using large amounts of work created by humans, like writing and artwork, often without creators' permission. Because of this, AI-generated content is like copying or stealing from other people’s work. This raises lots of concerns about copyright, fairness, and the widespread use of generative AI for commercial purposes, which takes work or opportunities away from real, human creators!

On the forums, we want to see the thoughts and creativity of humans! 😊

The warning system
This could be a bit confusing to explain, but I'll do my best! When a rule is broken, one of three things could happen:
  • Notification / Reminder: Notifications and reminders are for minor or accidental rule-breaking. If a post is in the wrong place, it might be moved. Or, if a post doesn't quite follow the rules, it could be edited or removed. In these cases, you might receive a notification or direct message to let you know. These aren't warnings, and there aren't any "warning points" attached.

  • Warning: A warning is an official notice that a rule was broken. As examples, these could be given for repeated rule-breaking or more serious behaviour, like being very rude to another member. Each warning adds a certain number of "warning points" to your account. If someone reaches a specific number of points, the system will automatically apply a temporary ban.

  • Ban: A ban means someone is not allowed to use the forum. This is more serious and relatively rare. It usually happens only if someone breaks a rule very badly, or they receive many warnings for continued rule-breaking.
As an example of the warning system being used:
Someone insults another member and receives a warning worth 5 points. ➡️ Later, they insult someone again and receive another warning worth 5 points (they have 10 points in total now). ➡️ At 10 warning points in total, the system automatically applies a two-day ban.

Note that this is a new system to The Bell Tree, so it's something that will likely require some adjustment as we go!
Thank you @S.J. for clearing that up for me!
 
Nice seeing this finally done!

I didn't read everything yet, although I read a lot.

I have one thing to note for now:

I feel like specifically making an alt account should warrant 30-40 warning points, because it is very intentional, malicious behaviour - you don't make an alt account "by mistake" or "just because of bad judgement". Not only is it very intentional and unfair, it is also very disrespectful to everyone who is participating (fairly) and goes harshly against the spirit of the events. I'm not sure what other ways there would be to cheat but if it is cut and dry cheating and not something that is up for debate or interpretation, I'd still say that the 30-40 points could be warranted for the exact same reasons.
Some alternate accounts are created by mistake, if they forgot that they already registered or are unaware of the rules (neither makes it okay, however). But I agree, someone using an alt to cheat in an event or giveaway should face heavier penalties. They may be disqualified from the event as well, depending on the circumstances. The current list of points is more of a rough idea about what it might look like, so I'm sure what we end up implementing will be less rigid in these categories.
 
I appreciate the thought and time the mods have put into these new rules. I also like that you are open to some feedback still on certain things.

I hope this all leads to a more peaceful, accepting and fun forum to be part of!
Post automatically merged:

I want to add a question though about AI. How can you tell if someone is using it? AI has become more and more of a concern to me
 
Last edited:
A red flag went up when I saw the part about off-site communities, since Patreon can withhold funds if they don't like what you've been paid to draw, but this is different. Other communities have had people post other's dodo codes, saying the visit is for something else. Like if you're hosting for diy giveaway, and a bunch of people visit for good turnip prices and shake your fruit trees. Of course this was back when the game was new.
 
I want to add a question though about AI. How can you tell if someone is using it? AI has become more and more of a concern to me
Hi Shawn!

I am by no means an expert on generative AI, but I can offer at least some direction! I’ll specifically address identifying images and text, and not audio or video, since hopefully the latter are less likely to appear on the forums.

AI-generated Images
GenAI images are becoming increasingly harder to identify because their developers use human feedback (the methods we use to identify images as being AI) to then train the AI to make more natural looking images.

Some things to help you identify AI-generated images:
  • AI image detection tools: Note that these tools are not perfectly accurate. I haven't used them myself, but one I know of is AI or Not (requires an account, but has a free tier). My preferred method is using Google Images search to do a reverse image search to see if I can pinpoint the origin of the image. Similar can be done with TinEye.
  • Anatomical or object errors: Does an image look suspiciously flawless? Does a person or image look unusually polished? Does someone’s skin look airbrushed? Do they have the right number of digits? Does a person in an image match the context of their surroundings? Do wrinkles in fabric look like they are where they would naturally occur? Are there melting objects (e.g., does jewellery, clothing, or other items melt into the skin of a human?)? Does the placement of limbs appear normal?
  • Text errors: Can you read the text on a sign, a T-shirt, or a signpost? Can you read the “signature” on the piece of "art"? Often AI-generated images garble text on signs or insert unreadable faux signatures.
  • Physics and perspective: Does the physics of the scene make sense? Does the lighting? Are the shadows in the correct places and are they the correct shapes?
  • Technical fingerprints and metadata: What does the metadata reveal about the image?
Here is a kind of fun beginner resource to see examples between real and AI-generated images, and test yourself: Here!
As well, I’m sure there are quite a few guides you can find online, but I thought this one was useful: Here!

In my own experience, at first I wasn't particularly good at identifying AI-generated images, but with a little time and attention, you can develop an eye for it!
AI-generated Text
Identifying AI-generated text content can be a bit harder on the human eye. Still, here are some things to look for:
  • Overly polished language, with flawless grammar and spelling.
  • A generic tone, or a tone inconsistent with what you might have expected.
  • Longer, more formal responses.
  • A lack of depth. I.e., the paragraphs feel long, but they feel like they’re not really saying much.
  • A lack of real world connection. I.e., the language doesn’t contain emotions, personal feelings, opinions, or anecdotes.
I wouldn’t use any of these individually to decide that a piece of text is AI-generated.

There are also AI-based detection tools for detecting AI-generated text too (AI detecting genAI!). The models train on human written data vs AI-generated data. It uses indicators like word frequency, word and punctuation patterns, sentence length and structure, fluency, and predictability to detect the likelihood something is AI-generated. Unfortunately, these are far from perfect, and truthfully, some can be quite bad in their detection! But, they’re still an option and there are plenty of free ones that can be found through your search engine.

Those lists are by no means exhaustive, but I hope they're a good starting point! If anyone has any additional input about how to identify genAI text and images, rather than discussing it here, it's something that could certainly benefit from its own discussion thread! Prior to the full ban of genAI on the forum, Mistreil started a thread on Generative AI Images on TBT so that could also be something to check out!
 
I appreciate the thought and time the mods have put into these new rules. I also like that you are open to some feedback still on certain things.

I hope this all leads to a more peaceful, accepting and fun forum to be part of!
Post automatically merged:

I want to add a question though about AI. How can you tell if someone is using it? AI has become more and more of a concern to me

ChatGPT generative text is so distinctive and set in patterns. I don't know if it's ethical to tell you to go speak to it, but I would recommend looking up prompts or text from it.

Once you get familiarized with how it speaks it becomes quite easy to see that it's not human.

We played chess together so as an analogy, when your familiar with chess and practice often your brain will start to 'ding' you on right or wrong moves.

It's not that different when it comes to noticing that it isn't a real person behind the writing. To me, a generative post looks rather lifeless. Especially in a forum like this where people so often have their own unique ways of talking. You come across people's posts so frequently that generative text can stick out like a sore thumb.

Not to put S.J on the spot, but notice their frequent use of explanation points, or how I prefer to space out my text frequently.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top