also a glitch isn't a feature unless you are bethesda and even then, lol.
I am laughing at this comment from the Whiterun prison where I am rotting after a horse reported my crimes.
also a glitch isn't a feature unless you are bethesda and even then, lol.
Normally I would say since they made the game they can do whatever they want to patch it up, but I think lowering the ABD interest rates was a questionable choice. That was maybe the one patch they made so far that feels like they took away a +positive feature of the game, and now the interest does very little, especially for those that don't time travel. Excessive time travelers can still make a lot of bells off of it, as there doesn't seem to be a cap on time traveling so I'm not sure what they were trying to prevent.
I'm going to be really honest here.... I can't help but feel like the people upset at the spawn rate fix have never actually played an online game before. Nintendo is not overreaching here and it doesn't have to be some doomsday type of thing where they'll "ruin" the game some day. The point is simple.... Nintendo screwed up the spawn rates. The "rare" bugs were spawning so commonly that they weren't even rare anymore by any means. They were, at best, common or uncommon spawn rates.
Developers are not perfect. They are not gods. They will make a mistake in the development of a game that may not be caught until public release, but that doesn't mean they're doing it to hurt anyone personally. It just means they're trying to balance the game and the spawn rates, which is a good thing. The rare fish were so much harder to find than the rare bugs, it was sad. I'm glad they've fixed it.
This is just my personal opinion, but I am simply satisfied to see that the grass deterioration feature has been removed.
Anything else that either differs or has been brought back from previous games is just the icing on the cake for me.
they didnt revoke any features, the game still has bugs
I don't know if Nintendo legal "owns" the game after you buy it, and it may vary by country, but I'd argue they shouldn't be allowed to tamper with a product you've already bought without your consent. After all, Nintendo can't come to my house and physically modify my game, so why should they be allowed to digitally modify it without consent? If Nintendo had asked for my consent to agree to reduced bug spawns in exchange for adding Leif, Redd, and other content to my game, I would have grudgingly approved, but Nintendo shouldn't have any right to forcibly modify my game without consent. Online games are different in that updating is a requirement for participating in online play using a service, but you should never be forced to update a solo game unless you agree to it.