Thanks for the graphic
@rubyrubert!
I am a bit confused though: in the infographic, there is a picture of the form that you use for reporting. Cheating is one of the options that you can denote. So, why is it that Nintendo will not take any action against hacked items and so consequently, the creator of the infographic decided not to recommend that you report those islands? Wouldn't hacking fall under the cheating category?
I have not been able to find any reports verifying that Nintendo does not take action against hacked items. Though it would be time-consuming, I do find it unlikely that Nintendo wouldn't care seeing as it is a clear violation of TOS.
The creator has justified this decision on their Twitter by claiming that hacked items don't hurt anyone else, therefore it's not worth reporting, and time travelling is considered cheating as well and you wouldn't report a time-travelled island, right? This logic just doesn't make sense to me. Thing is, hacked islands are against TOS whereas time travelling is not. Moreover, the presence of hacked items could very well hurt others if people are incentivized to get a hold of them after seeing a pretty hacked island in the Dream Suite - there were reports that some of the hacks that were going around were actually causing glitches to people's islands, and it is something that could get you in trouble with Nintendo.
The creator has also claimed that they have spoken to a Nintendo representative who has supposedly said that hacked items in dreams do not warrant a ban from Nintendo Online. But, no name of the representative was given, and we have no idea of how they were actually able to get a hold of said representative. And why would a representative give an answer that runs contrary to their own TOS?