Kit and kirby are counterclaiming for all intents and purposes. Kit is being incredibly shifty about his totally not cop claim (which we all know it was, come on), kirby counterclaimed, and while I kind of get karen's questioning the major attack on seroja, it still doesn't hold water IMO. When karen briefly commented on the cleb thing, it wasn't as big of a deal as it was when seroja entered the thread. When seroja entered, it was literally the biggest story in the two ongoing conflicts in the thread at the time. At least karen actually said SOMETHING about it even before it really exploded; seroja said almost nothing when it was a much bigger deal. Why we're letting seroja get away scot-free with this, I don't know, except if she *might* be GF. 
The biggest thing I don't get after all of this is why we're not lynching between seroja and kit.
My preference in lynch order to gain the most information would be: Seroja, Kit, and Fireninja. Lynching fireninja seems like a good idea but it would gain us the least amount of info - if he's scum, it lends credence to Kirby, but we know nothing about seroja and kit's alignment. If he's town, it casts doubt on kirby but again, we learn nothing about kit and seroja. Lynching kit would expose seroja if kit flips scum, and would lend credence to Kirby's investigate on fireninja. If kit flips good, it would partially vindicate seroja, and cast serious doubt on kirby's result on fireninja. Lynching seroja would expose kit if seroja is maf, and probably confirm kit if seroja flips town, and cast heavy suspicion on kirby?s result, vindicating fireninja.
So lynching fireninja only tells us about one player's alignment, while lynching kit or seroja tells us about three player's alignments. Crazy cop and miller are very plausible scenarios in fireninja's case.