been thinking about this, and I wonder if people don't have themselves to blame for this. star trees have been in the game for months now, Nintendo definitely knew about them. and I know very little about game development, but from what I know patching star trees wasn't that difficult (please correct me if I'm wrong!). they probably could've patched this a while ago. why didn't they?
I wonder if Nintendo wasn't trying to look the other way? but with dream addresses being shared and more and more people posting pics of their star trees, they couldn't ignore it anymore. so they ultimately decided to patch it.
this is just speculation. I'm not trying to say this is what definitively happened, it's just a possibility. I do think people who hack or own hacked items need to be wiser and not broadcast their activities to the world. a lot of people were using these trees without really understanding what they were doing, and now they're mad that Nintendo patched them out without realizing that Nintendo owns the code and other people aren't allowed to mess with it. idk. I wish people would take this as a learning lesson; if you're gonna violate a company's ToS, you need to be sneaky about it, not brag about it on Twitter.
definitely possible, and if that's the case that's why I think people have themselves to blame. if people had been more quiet about it Nintendo might've let it slip by. there's other visual glitches in the game that don't get a lot of attention because they're not as "aesthetic" so they don't get talked about much in social media, and so far Nintendo hasn't acknowledged them. but you don't want your userbase to broadcast the holes in your code to the world.They probably focused on the bigger glitches that happened during the initial release of the game first. But that said, maybe they didn't actually know about the star trees until they became more popular through social media. The dreams only adding to that.
I think you're definitely right which is why I still firmly believe that once something gets popular, it usually destroys itself.definitely possible, and if that's the case that's why I think people have themselves to blame. if people had been more quiet about it Nintendo might've let it slip by. there's other visual glitches in the game that don't get a lot of attention because they're not as "aesthetic" so they don't get talked about much in social media, and so far Nintendo hasn't acknowledged them. but you don't want your userbase to broadcast the holes in your code to the world.
not sure if you've been answered yet, (reading this thread slowly lol) but they actually have - newer switches don't have a vulnerability that old switches could exploit to be modded. Instead there's a different hoop they have to jump through but I'll cut this line here since I don't want to promote hacking.Very true. But there are tons of other hacks they haven't yet patched, why don't they just add an update to the console or something to make sure people can't hack? Idk
For 1 star tree?! That isn't fair. If you're that desperate for a star tree, just buy one for real money. Not saying anyone should, or promoting buying one, but 240 NMT for one tree is extremely outrageous and overpriced. I feel really bad for that person. They literally paid 240 NMT for a money tree.I just someone say on my Instagram feed that they paid 240 NMT for a star tree. I'm sorry but Nintendo isn't the bad guy here.
For 1 star tree?! That isn't fair. If you're that desperate for a star tree, just buy one for real money. Not saying anyone should, or promoting buying one, but 240 NMT for one tree is extremely outrageous and overpriced. I feel really bad for that person. They literally paid 240 NMT for a money tree.
I feel like those are the people who just buy the trees to “show Nintendo their place.” I find it kinda ridiculous.More like “if you’re that desperate for a star tree, consider your life choices and feel free to read the TOS because it applies to you too.” I admit to not feeling too bad for the person who bought it. I mean, how do you not know that the tree wasn’t a legit in-game item?
What’s truly absurd is how some of the same people complain about Nintendo’s possible monetization strategies for AC and say they would never, ever pay for DLC of any kind. Then they turn around and pay real money for one hex-edited tree. Lord.