Trent the Paladin
Retired Staff
Was it really? Oh my god.. //dies
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Double_jeopardy
Not to be confused with the movie named after this.
Was it really? Oh my god.. //dies
No, no, I'm aware of the double jeopardy thing. But I never knew about evidence that she killed her daughter was found.
Yep. Unfortunate stuff.
side agenda: this thing needs to be reworked
I get the idea of it, but as a baseline, and especially when hard evidence is found, it should become irrelevant
basically it should be a privilege that all start with, but if situations change, then it becomes one they lose
A thug stole and put his dirty hands on an officers gun. He got all he deserved.
A thug stole and put his dirty hands on an officers gun. He got all he deserved.
such a thing could be easily abused if reworked like that. like yeah, i understand what you're saying and it'd help bring about justice but i personally see it going south very quickly.
I like how the ones that support Wilson are far more insulting/rude about compared to those that don't.
- - - Post Merge - - -
I get what you're saying, but its not like other things in the system aren't already abused I'm sure. Regardless though, it should still exist, just not as the end-all be-all that it is now.
Hell, you could argue that this case is abusing double jeopardy, if you were to say that the trial itself was biased.
A thug stole and put his dirty hands on an officers gun. He got all he deserved.
So if you're ever in a situation where you absolutely have to fight somebody else to the death to save the life of another, say for example a home invasion, you'd let them die or you feel you are literal scum? Killing is awful sure, but simply labeling all people who have killed as the scum of the earth isn't right.
Also somebody mentioned something about why not taze him instead I believe? Kinda relevant link unless you believe all Police Officers are pigs: here
Body Cams: Discussed here
Other AskLEO Ferguson related threads: Here
Perhaps not credible sources, but they give insight into some matters.
There's also still a federal inquiry into Darren Wilson so something still can happen: Link
hiw was he a thug? Why was there not a finger print check in the gun? sources?A thug stole and put his dirty hands on an officers gun. He got all he deserved.
Darren Wilson shot an unarmed teenager 7 times. The boy had his hands above his head, and he died 158 feet away from the police vehicle. It is also stated that Darren Wilson did not know the boy robbed the store. In fact, the man that was working at the store at the time didn't even call the police. (There is also video evidence of the teen paying for his cigarettes as well) It is understood that Michael Brown was a big guy and could probably punch the crap out of this police officer, but that is not the case either. Just look at the pictures of Darren Wilson's "injuries". It's like nothing is there! If the gun was necessary, it should've been used to APPREHEND this boy, not kill him. Petty theft is not punishable by death.
That should state enough.
I am very passionate about this subject, because my stepfather's best friend was shot and killed by an officer with no reason whatsoever. It changed his life forever. This is the stuff that happens every day, and I believe that as a community, we have no choice but to act out at this point. This issue has been a silent killer of minorities for so long, and I am tired of it being swept under the rug.
Darren Wilson didn't even get indicted people!