I thought you were playing the Pokemanz
If you are neutral in situations of injustice, you have chosen the side of the oppressor.- Desmond Tutu
Slow your roll. Throwing a torch where nothing but an opinion is expressed makes you as guilty as one of the protesters.
Also I said keep it civil. Don't attack me.
It's often that the oppressed become the oppressors.
i... didnt say i was attacking you. the protestors arent guilty tho.
what since when
Also, attacking ZR388 is a bad idea. She don't take no **** from no one.
I think that a cop unnecessarily shot a child repeatedly and his racial insecurity had a part in making him do it.
A cop. Shot a child. In the chest. 6 times. And he isn't punished at all? That's grade A bull. And it's also a representation of the constant ignorance to racial insensitivity that cops carry around with them. And enough is enough.
I bet everyone commenting on this is white. I know I am. I'm so white that I have to wear sunscreen in the winter, then I get lost in the snow. But I know that this is wrong.
"Dooley’s spokeswoman, Pat Washington, said there have been long-standing concerns among many black leaders in the community regarding County Prosecutor Robert McCulloch’s ability to handle such cases because his father was killed in the line of duty when McCulloch was 12 years old. The man who shot his father was black."
This blog very thoroughly and accurately pointing out every flaw and hole (which, might I add, there's a WHOLE LOT) in this case.
"Bob McCulloch had every right to pass on an indictment. But absent an indictment, he has no right to the pretense that Office Wilson’s guilt or innocence has been adequately litigated. He should have to live with whatever backlash his non-indictment provoked."
And even more evidence that he's extremely biased.
My opinion? At least get that moron off the police force. He killed someone. He doesn't deserve to keep 'protecting' when his resort to an attack from a child is to repeatedly shoot them.
If you'd like more proof, I'll provide more links.
child?
17 year old. If you're under 18, you're a child. But you're right, he was a big hulking monster. I get it. But I'm talking in terms of the law.
Teenager but what difference does it make?
17 year old. If you're under 18, you're a child. But you're right, he was a big hulking monster. I get it. But I'm talking in terms of the law. Also, my point is still valid even if you don't consider him a child. He KILLED SOMEONE. He shouldn't be on a police force after that.
Michael Brown was 18 but I still agree with everything else you said.
You treat 17 year olds as children?
- - - Post Merge - - -
Teens can think better and act differently than children