What Are Your Political Views?

[KarlaKGB]

Pay for what? If you're going to ask a billion pound question you could be more specific...

I'll just quote you again

I agree with a lot of their values and policies, they care about the people 'at the bottom' not the old, white, wealthy men that most parties pander to, they want to maintain the NHS rather than privatise it (Which would negatively affect people like myself and my family who cannot afford to pay for healthcare), they actually want to scrap university fees, they want to stop the HS2, they want to return the railway services back to the public instead of being under the control of the- rather useless- private companies and they want to boost the minimum wage by 2020 to the same levels as the living wage, which is set at ?7.85 per hour for 2015.

Let me do it again

I agree with a lot of their values and policies, they care about the people 'at the bottom' not the old, white, wealthy men that most parties pander to, they want to maintain the NHS rather than privatise it (Which would negatively affect people like myself and my family who cannot afford to pay for healthcare), they actually want to scrap university fees, they want to stop the HS2, they want to return the railway services back to the public instead of being under the control of the- rather useless- private companies and they want to boost the minimum wage by 2020 to the same levels as the living wage, which is set at ?7.85 per hour for 2015.

It all sounds great on paper, but how does the government pay for it?

 

[-Apples-]

I am pro-life and anti-socialized medicine. I don't know about disapproving of pro-choicers, but I'm discriminative towards socialized medicine supporters, especially against those who hate the opponents for opposing them.

 

[Alienfish]

snip

Well I guess they are mostly basing it on whatever religion the country has adapted as their official. But yes it's incredibly stupid to prevent it. I mean it's the woman's decision and hers alone.

- - - Post Merge - - -

I am pro-life and anti-socialized medicine. I don't know about disapproving of pro-choicers, but I'm discriminative towards socialized medicine supporters, especially against those who hate the opponents for opposing them.

May I ask why you are pro-life?

 

[-Apples-]

May I ask why you are pro-life?

Since I was younger, I believed that it was considered murder to terminate a pregnancy. I am tolerable of them now, but only for a few exceptions. Abortions cannot be used as an excuse for getting away with having a child. If they don't want kids, they're not ready for kids, or they think having kids will interfere with having a career, why not consider adoptions?

 

[KarlaKGB]

I think the debate comes down to whether or not the foetus is a living human being, and whether the mother's rights outweigh the rights of the foetus.

 

[Princess Weeb]

Well I guess they are mostly basing it on whatever religion the country has adapted as their official. But yes it's incredibly stupid to prevent it. I mean it's the woman's decision and hers alone.

- - - Post Merge - - -

May I ask why you are pro-life?

because a lump of cells that are barely developed properly with 0 (or minimal - it really all depends on how far on in the pregnancy you are I suppose for all of that ahah) feelings/pain tolerance etc deserve to live in this already over populated world!!!!!!!!!!!!

any mental health issues the mother has or could develop from going through immense physical and emotional changes to have an unloved/unwanted child are stupid and she should stop being sad!!!!!!!!! ccc::

p.s that was pure sarcasm for those that can't seem to understand it

 

[-Apples-]

I think the debate comes down to whether or not the foetus is a living human being, and whether the mother's rights outweigh the rights of the foetus.

Well I'm not going to continue talking about abortions. It's a very touchy subject and should be left out of the debate. I have my full views on abortion in my 60th blog entry, along with a few other issues.

 

[Colour Bandit]

I'll just quote you again


Let me do it again

It all sounds great on paper, but how does the government pay for it?

Oh all that, well the NHS has been funded by the tax payers since it was created so the taxes do fine, the railway services used to be funded by the tax payers and then a Tory government decided that privatising it would be a good idea- even though now all the trains are crap and everyone hates Abellio Greater Anglia (The **** train company I have to deal with), the university fees used to be a lot cheaper and then the tories and Lib Dems allowed every Uni to set their fees to ?9,000 a year, even the **** universities. With the minimum wage, if you look it has been slowly increased over the years but not by enough, the costs of living are rising but the wages aren't matching it- hence a lot of families are falling into poverty. I'm not sure how it would be funded, but generally I would assume that if the people have more money they will be able to spend more on products which give the businesses back their money? I don't really know but I do know that currently the minimum wage is too low- I get paid ?5.60 per hour, I got my pay cheque today and working 7 hours a day for 4-6 days a week I only made ?379 last month, that wouldn't even pay for a months rent where I live... Either way I'm going to vote for the party which I agree with, which is the Green party but even I understand that it is too small a party- with only one MP in the Houses of Parliament, not some party which is just going to make life even harder for anyone who isn't wealthy.

 

[Princess Weeb]

also (because this is political)

I have no problem with people that are pro life, and who hold certain beliefs about equally controversial subjects

it's when people vote against the freedom of someone else that doesn't affect them I have a serious problem :"))

 

[Alienfish]

Since I was younger, I believed that it was considered murder to terminate a pregnancy. I am tolerable of them now, but only for a few exceptions. Abortions cannot be used as an excuse for getting away with having a child. If they don't want kids, they're not ready for kids, or they think having kids will interfere with having a career, why not consider adoptions?

Because it's too easy to get pregnant, not even if you snip off the tubes on a woman it's not 100%. Only staying off sex would prevent it. And I find that murder argument pretty wrong, for real. It's like people could decide for you and you don't have your own will. Plus this is abused way too much.

While I can get people thinks used a bit too much(which I don't, be glad we have rights) forbidding it would lead to horrible consequences and I don't want to get back to a religious state where you have to pull the kid out with a hanger.

- - - Post Merge - - -

also (because this is political)

I have no problem with people that are pro life, and who hold certain beliefs about equally controversial subjects

it's when people vote against the freedom of someone else that doesn't affect them I have a serious problem :"))

Problems is a lot of pro-lifers wants it to become the rule therefore I have a huge problem with it.

 

[KarlaKGB]

because a lump of cells that are barely developed properly with 0 (or minimal - it really all depends on how far on in the pregnancy you are I suppose for all of that ahah) feelings/pain tolerance etc deserve to live in this already over populated world!!!!!!!!!!!!

any mental health issues the mother has or could develop from going through immense physical and emotional changes to have an unloved/unwanted child are stupid and she should stop being sad!!!!!!!!! ccc::

p.s that was pure sarcasm for those that can't seem to understand it

nice well developed grownup argument.

 

[Princess Weeb]

nice well developed grownup argument.

did you read the last sentence or

 

[Alienfish]

I think she said she was sarcastic.

Also how is removing a lump of cell murder. It's like oh I can't treat your cancer it's cells it's murder.

 

[-Apples-]

I am still against abortion no matter what, unless if it were for emergencies.

If I had a choice of either legalizing abortion with no limits or preventing Obama's radical socialist policies from getting repealed (including socialized medicine and school lunch ban), I would go with the former option. It's better to have less laws than more laws. Repealing anti-abortion laws subtracts laws, but socialized medicine will add more laws. I may find abortion murder, but if some women want to have an abortion to get away with having kids, that's fine. If a woman (or man) wants to socialize medicine, it's not fine. People should be free to do what they want as long as it doesn't harm people. Failure to provide insurance as an employer isn't harmful, but racial discrimination is. Crime is harmful, but gay marriage isn't.

 

[Princess Weeb]

I am still against abortion no matter what, unless if it were for emergencies.

If I had a choice of either legalizing abortion with no limits or preventing Obama's radical socialist policies from getting repealed (including socialized medicine and school lunch ban), I would go with the former option. It's better to have less laws than more laws. Repealing anti-abortion laws subtracts laws, but socialized medicine will add more laws. I may find abortion murder, but if some women want to have an abortion to get away with having kids, that's fine. If a woman (or man) wants to socialize medicine, it's not fine. People should be free to do what they want as long as it doesn't harm people. Failure to provide insurance as an employer isn't harmful, but racial discrimination is. Crime is harmful, but gay marriage isn't.

^people I am fine with <3

 

[KarlaKGB]

did you read the last sentence or

Yes, you're trying to make a point by being flippant, facetious and sarcastic. Hardly a grownup way of debating.

 

[Alienfish]

I am still against abortion no matter what, unless if it were for emergencies.

People should be free to do what they want as long as it doesn't harm people.

Fine. But then I think pro-life does hurt the woman in many ways but that's my business.

I have so much problem with this "freedom" and how people want it just because everything else is Stalinism to the people. Indirectly no one will get anything because hey I'm free I never get sick. I mean...blame yourself.

 

[Princess Weeb]

Yes, you're trying to make a point by being flippant, facetious and sarcastic. Hardly a grownup way of debating.

I wasn't debating anyone at that point, or even now, though.
Idk if you know this but we're on a forum for a kids game, so I have no idea how I am required to be mature, regardless.
Even if I was, I've literally just made serious points at least slightly in your favour???

 

[Ashtot]

I wasn't debating anyone at that point, or even now, though.
Idk if you know this but we're on a forum for a kids game, so I have no idea how I am required to be mature, regardless.
Even if I was, I've literally just made serious points at least slightly in your favour???

Poor puppies can't be hurt but may as well shovel the humans out of the wombs because they serve no purpose in this overpopulated world ruined by men.

 

[Princess Weeb]

Poor puppies can't be hurt but may as well shovel the humans out of the wombs because they serve no purpose in this overpopulated world ruined by men.

sTOP OPPRESSING ME!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


anyway yeah idk everyone should have equal rights there u go

goodbye friendos