Video Chat Confirmed for Pok

Rawburt said:
Tyeforce said:
Rawburt said:
Tyeforce said:
Quoting limited to 4 levels deep<div class='spoiler_toggle'>nothing that hasn't been said already</div><div class="spoiler" style="display:none;">
Quoting limited to 4 levels deepoptional feature) before they even know everything about it. And if you're afraid that it's going to "take away from the game", then it's obviously not a feature for you, so don't use it. I can understand why some of you probably won't find much use from it, but there are a lot of people who will love the inclusion of video chat. Hell, I would have loved to have video chat in Pok
 
Okay, yes, it's not going to reinvent Pokemon. But either way, I still don't give a crap about seeing the person on the other end.
I really cannot see where, or how this is meant to be any good!
And as has just been said else where, 3 on 3 battle... *censored.2.0*'s gettin' cramped!
 
I guess that's pretty cool but I don't think I'll ever use it really. Kinda like Voice Chat, I just mute that *censored.2.0* and talk with the other person on MSN.

As for the Pokemon not following you, I would have hoped by now we'd have screenshots of that. But since September is getting pretty close, I'm not expecting it.
 
Tyeforce said:
Rawburt said:
Tyeforce said:
Rawburt said:
Quoting limited to 4 levels deep<div class='spoiler_toggle'>nothing that hasn't been said already</div><div class="spoiler" style="display:none;">
Quoting limited to 4 levels deepoptional feature) before they even know everything about it. And if you're afraid that it's going to "take away from the game", then it's obviously not a feature for you, so don't use it. I can understand why some of you probably won't find much use from it, but there are a lot of people who will love the inclusion of video chat. Hell, I would have loved to have video chat in Pok
 
AndyB said:
Okay, yes, it's not going to reinvent Pokemon. But either way, I still don't give a crap about seeing the person on the other end.
I really cannot see where, or how this is meant to be any good!
And as has just been said else where, 3 on 3 battle... *censored.2.0*'s gettin' cramped!
Again, if you don't think you're going to like it, then don't use it. It's optional, you know. It's like complaining about items in Smash Bros. because you don't like them. Guess what? You don't have to use them! But it's good that they're there for the people who do like them, and video chat is no different.

And you're jumping to the conclusion that triple battles won't be developed well enough to not feel cramped or confusing. Have some faith in Game Freak, why don't you? And, like video chat, it's not going to be something that's forced on you. Well, it may be forced in some parts, for example there may be some trainers that you'll have to face in triple battles as you play through the story, but it's not like it's something that will make the game unplayable for you. Wait until you actually experience triple battles for yourself before you call them cramped.
 
John102 said:
Tye, go to serebii(lol, not bulbapedia), check the archived news for july the 8th and read the second paragraph. Just sayin', I'm pretty sure it mentions something about pokemon not being able to follow you...

http://www.serebii.net/archive/July-2010.shtml
No John, I either used my spies in Japan or made it up, because Tye knows everything and nothing you can possibly do will change that.
 
Tyeforce said:
AndyB said:
Okay, yes, it's not going to reinvent Pokemon. But either way, I still don't give a crap about seeing the person on the other end.
I really cannot see where, or how this is meant to be any good!
And as has just been said else where, 3 on 3 battle... *censored.2.0*'s gettin' cramped!
Again, if you don't think you're going to like it, then don't use it. It's optional, you know. It's like complaining about items in Smash Bros. because you don't like them. Guess what? You don't have to use them! But it's good that they're there for the people who do like them, and video chat is no different.

And you're jumping to the conclusion that triple battles won't be developed well enough to not feel cramped or confusing. Have some faith in Game Freak, why don't you? And, like video chat, it's not going to be something that's forced on you. Well, it may be forced in some parts, for example there may be some trainers that you'll have to face in triple battles as you play through the story, but it's not like it's something that will make the game unplayable for you. Wait until you actually experience triple battles for yourself before you call them cramped.
Here is my problem, why are you allowed say that it will be great and that game freak will do it great, but we're not allowed say the opposite???
 
Tyeforce said:
AndyB said:
Okay, yes, it's not going to reinvent Pokemon. But either way, I still don't give a crap about seeing the person on the other end.
I really cannot see where, or how this is meant to be any good!
And as has just been said else where, 3 on 3 battle... *censored.2.0*'s gettin' cramped!
Again, if you don't think you're going to like it, then don't use it. It's optional, you know. It's like complaining about items in Smash Bros. because you don't like them. Guess what? You don't have to use them! But it's good that they're there for the people who do like them, and video chat is no different.

And you're jumping to the conclusion that triple battles won't be developed well enough to not feel cramped or confusing. Have some faith in Game Freak, why don't you? And, like video chat, it's not going to be something that's forced on you. Well, it may be forced in some parts, for example there may be some trainers that you'll have to face in triple battles as you play through the story, but it's not like it's something that will make the game unplayable for you. Wait until you actually experience triple battles for yourself before you call them cramped.
Holy *censored.2.0*, shut the Hell up.
I never said I was going to use the video function anyway, much like Tom said with voice chat. Most people turned that off too.
You cannot say I'm jumping the gun without saying it to yourself. I honestly do not care how they will turn out, I'm just saying what I think of it as of now.

Finally, I'm with Rob. I'm pretty tired of you and your walls of texts to everyone that expressed their opinions, when you of all people should understand them. ;]
Cut people some slack and get off their back... Jack. *snaps fingers and walks away*
 
John102 said:
Tye, go to serebii(lol, not bulbapedia), check the archived news for july the 8th and read the second paragraph. Just sayin', I'm pretty sure it mentions something about pokemon not being able to follow you...

http://www.serebii.net/archive/July-2010.shtml
Serebii said:
This footage revealed that the Celebi is sent out during the special event and unfortunately seems to indicate once and for all that the Pok
 
Ciaran said:
Tyeforce said:
AndyB said:
Okay, yes, it's not going to reinvent Pokemon. But either way, I still don't give a crap about seeing the person on the other end.
I really cannot see where, or how this is meant to be any good!
And as has just been said else where, 3 on 3 battle... *censored.2.0*'s gettin' cramped!
Again, if you don't think you're going to like it, then don't use it. It's optional, you know. It's like complaining about items in Smash Bros. because you don't like them. Guess what? You don't have to use them! But it's good that they're there for the people who do like them, and video chat is no different.

And you're jumping to the conclusion that triple battles won't be developed well enough to not feel cramped or confusing. Have some faith in Game Freak, why don't you? And, like video chat, it's not going to be something that's forced on you. Well, it may be forced in some parts, for example there may be some trainers that you'll have to face in triple battles as you play through the story, but it's not like it's something that will make the game unplayable for you. Wait until you actually experience triple battles for yourself before you call them cramped.
Here is my problem, why are you allowed say that it will be great and that game freak will do it great, but we're not allowed say the opposite???
I didn't say that it will be great. I just said that there's no reason to say that it will be cramped when you haven't experienced it yourself. You can say that you're worried that it might feel cramped, but saying that it flat out will be cramped while knowing hardly anything about it is just pure ignorance.
 
Tyeforce said:
Ciaran said:
Tyeforce said:
AndyB said:
Okay, yes, it's not going to reinvent Pokemon. But either way, I still don't give a crap about seeing the person on the other end.
I really cannot see where, or how this is meant to be any good!
And as has just been said else where, 3 on 3 battle... *censored.2.0*'s gettin' cramped!
Again, if you don't think you're going to like it, then don't use it. It's optional, you know. It's like complaining about items in Smash Bros. because you don't like them. Guess what? You don't have to use them! But it's good that they're there for the people who do like them, and video chat is no different.

And you're jumping to the conclusion that triple battles won't be developed well enough to not feel cramped or confusing. Have some faith in Game Freak, why don't you? And, like video chat, it's not going to be something that's forced on you. Well, it may be forced in some parts, for example there may be some trainers that you'll have to face in triple battles as you play through the story, but it's not like it's something that will make the game unplayable for you. Wait until you actually experience triple battles for yourself before you call them cramped.
Here is my problem, why are you allowed say that it will be great and that game freak will do it great, but we're not allowed say the opposite???
I didn't say that it will be great. I just said that there's no reason to say that it will be cramped when you haven't experienced it yourself. You can say that you're worried that it might feel cramped, but saying that it flat out will be cramped while knowing hardly anything about it is just pure ignorance.
Shut. The. *censored.3.0*. Up.

Maybe you should stop being ignorant to the fact that that's all people say to you and follow their *censored.3.0*ing advice?? All you do is argue with people then use generalistic insults based on two *censored.3.0*ing lines you've read from them.

I see no reason for you to stay here.



Also, whenever you argue with someone, you never seem to move forward, work on that while you're gone forever.
 
AndyB said:
Tyeforce said:
AndyB said:
Okay, yes, it's not going to reinvent Pokemon. But either way, I still don't give a crap about seeing the person on the other end.
I really cannot see where, or how this is meant to be any good!
And as has just been said else where, 3 on 3 battle... *censored.2.0*'s gettin' cramped!
Again, if you don't think you're going to like it, then don't use it. It's optional, you know. It's like complaining about items in Smash Bros. because you don't like them. Guess what? You don't have to use them! But it's good that they're there for the people who do like them, and video chat is no different.

And you're jumping to the conclusion that triple battles won't be developed well enough to not feel cramped or confusing. Have some faith in Game Freak, why don't you? And, like video chat, it's not going to be something that's forced on you. Well, it may be forced in some parts, for example there may be some trainers that you'll have to face in triple battles as you play through the story, but it's not like it's something that will make the game unplayable for you. Wait until you actually experience triple battles for yourself before you call them cramped.
Holy *censored.2.0*, shut the Hell up.
I never said I was going to use the video function anyway, much like Tom said with voice chat. Most people turned that off too.
You cannot say I'm jumping the gun without saying it to yourself. I honestly do not care how they will turn out, I'm just saying what I think of it as of now.

Finally, I'm with Rob. I'm pretty tired of you and your walls of texts to everyone that expressed their opinions, when you of all people should understand them. ;]
Cut people some slack and get off their back... Jack. *snaps fingers and walks away*
I understand opinions very well, thank you very much. But what you said about triple battles being cramped was not an opinion, or at least it wasn't worded as one. You said, and I quote, "*censored.2.0*'s gettin' cramped!". By saying that it is getting cramped, not that it "looks like" it might be cramped or something similar, you're implying that it will be, without a doubt, cramped. And that's jumping to conclusions, as well as stating opinion as fact, which is ignorant. I know you, and many others, don't like how I say stuff like this, but it's your words that I'm talking about, not mine. You are the one who posted "*censored.2.0*'s gettin' cramped!", not me. And you know what? I wouldn't even bring any of this up if people wouldn't begin to argue with me in the first place. I made this thread to inform people of a new feature, not so we can all be ignorant and bash an optional feature that no one here has even experience yet, and not so we can argue about the definition of ignorance. Ignorant people who derail threads like this are to blame. If the ignorance wasn't posted in the first place, then I wouldn't have to reply to it. And, no, I don't have to reply to people, but you all make it so damn hard for me not to.
 
Tyeforce said:
Again, if you don't think you're going to like it, then don't use it. It's optional, you know. It's like complaining about items in Smash Bros. because you don't like them.
or like complaining about achievements coming to the 3DS!
 
Ciaran said:
Tyeforce said:
Ciaran said:
Tyeforce said:
Quoting limited to 4 levels deepdon't use it. It's optional, you know. It's like complaining about items in Smash Bros. because you don't like them. Guess what? You don't have to use them! But it's good that they're there for the people who do like them, and video chat is no different.

And you're jumping to the conclusion that triple battles won't be developed well enough to not feel cramped or confusing. Have some faith in Game Freak, why don't you? And, like video chat, it's not going to be something that's forced on you. Well, it may be forced in some parts, for example there may be some trainers that you'll have to face in triple battles as you play through the story, but it's not like it's something that will make the game unplayable for you. Wait until you actually experience triple battles for yourself before you call them cramped.
Here is my problem, why are you allowed say that it will be great and that game freak will do it great, but we're not allowed say the opposite???
I didn't say that it will be great. I just said that there's no reason to say that it will be cramped when you haven't experienced it yourself. You can say that you're worried that it might feel cramped, but saying that it flat out will be cramped while knowing hardly anything about it is just pure ignorance.
Shut. The. *censored.3.0*. Up.

Maybe you should stop being ignorant to the fact that that's all people say to you and follow their *censored.3.0*ing advice?? All you do is argue with people then use generalistic insults based on two *censored.3.0*ing lines you've read from them.

I see no reason for you to stay here.



Also, whenever you argue with someone, you never seem to move forward, work on that while you're gone forever.
Guess what? I see no reason for you to stay here, either. Half of your posts are trolling or flaming, anyway. People like you can tell me to shut up and that I'm the ignorant one all you want, but that doesn't make it the truth. You argue with me and hate me like you do because you disagree with me. You can't even back up your reasons as to why you believe that I'm being ignorant. That's because I'm not, you are. I'm not the one flaming and cursing, am I? No, you are. I'm not the one complaining about an optional feature to a game, am I? No, you are. You can keep on disregarding my walls of text and throwing around the baseless insults all you want, but in the process you're only making your ignorance show even more.

And I'm not the one who doesn't move forward in arguments, it's people like you who don't move forward in arguments beyond the trolling, flaming, and other ignorance. Granted, sometimes I do restate what I've previously said, but only because the people who I'm arguing with seem to be either ignorant what I've said or just can't get it through their heads.
 
//RUN.exe said:
Tyeforce said:
Again, if you don't think you're going to like it, then don't use it. It's optional, you know. It's like complaining about items in Smash Bros. because you don't like them.
or like complaining about achievements coming to the 3DS!
Have you even read anything that I've been posting?
Tyeforce said:
You don't understand. I said that I don't want achievements on the 3DS <big><big><big>if</big></big></big> they're something that I won't like and they're forced on you. If I like them, or even if I don't but they're not forced on you, then I have no problem at all. There's a big <big><big><big>if</big></big></big> there. I wasn't being ignorant, because I stated that I would only complain about it <big><big><big>if</big></big></big> it was forced and was something that I didn't like. The people who are arguing about video chat in this thread aren't saying that they won't like it "if" this or "if" that. They're just flat out saying that it's stupid and has no value, which is completely wrong and downright ignorant.
That's exactly why I used large font for that post. Because I knew people would ignore it, just as you have.
 
Tyeforce said:
Ciaran said:
Tyeforce said:
Ciaran said:
Quoting limited to 4 levels deepdon't use it. It's optional, you know. It's like complaining about items in Smash Bros. because you don't like them. Guess what? You don't have to use them! But it's good that they're there for the people who do
I didn't say that it will be great. I just said that there's no reason to say that it will be cramped when you haven't experienced it yourself. You can say that you're worried that it might feel cramped, but saying that it flat out will be cramped while knowing hardly anything about it is just pure ignorance.
Shut. The. *censored.3.0*. Up.

Maybe you should stop being ignorant to the fact that that's all people say to you and follow their *censored.3.0*ing advice?? All you do is argue with people then use generalistic insults based on two *censored.3.0*ing lines you've read from them.

I see no reason for you to stay here.



Also, whenever you argue with someone, you never seem to move forward, work on that while you're gone forever.
Guess what? I see no reason for you to stay here, either. Half of your posts are trolling or flaming, anyway. People like you can tell me to shut up and that I'm the ignorant one all you want, but that doesn't make it the truth. You argue with me and hate me like you do because you disagree with me. You can't even back up your reasons as to why you believe that I'm being ignorant. That's because I'm not, you are. I'm not the one flaming and cursing, am I? No, you are. I'm not the one complaining about an optional feature to a game, am I? No, you are. You can keep on disregarding my walls of text and throwing around the baseless insults all you want, but in the process you're only making your ignorance show even more.

And I'm not the one who doesn't move forward in arguments, it's people like you who don't move forward in arguments beyond the trolling, flaming, and other ignorance. Granted, sometimes I do restate what I've previously said, but only because the people who I'm arguing with seem to be either ignorant what I've said or just can't get it through their heads.
wikipedia said:
Ignorance is the state of being uninformed

What am I uninformed about??

And I come here because I occasionaly have a discussion with some friends which doesn't end in a giant flamewar, like most of your posts do.

Now stop delaying the inevitable and take your leave gracefully.
 
The target audience for Pokemon and the usefulness of this feature clash. And yeah, the diehard fans out there may enjoy it but I still doubt seeing the use.
 
Tyeforce said:
//RUN.exe said:
Tyeforce said:
Again, if you don't think you're going to like it, then don't use it. It's optional, you know. It's like complaining about items in Smash Bros. because you don't like them.
or like complaining about achievements coming to the 3DS!
Have you even read anything that I've been posting?
Tyeforce said:
You don't understand. I said that I don't want achievements on the 3DS <big><big><big>if</big></big></big> they're something that I won't like and they're forced on you. If I like them, or even if I don't but they're not forced on you, then I have no problem at all. There's a big <big><big><big>if</big></big></big> there. I wasn't being ignorant, because I stated that I would only complain about it <big><big><big>if</big></big></big> it was forced and was something that I didn't like. The people who are arguing about video chat in this thread aren't saying that they won't like it "if" this or "if" that. They're just flat out saying that it's stupid and has no value, which is completely wrong and downright ignorant.
That's exactly why I used large font for that post. Because I knew people would ignore it, just as you have.
i'm sorry i was too busy trying to think of how achievements could be forced onto someone in such a way that it would be awful and terrible and downright sickening.

so far i can't really think of anything reasonable.
 
<object type='application/x-shockwave-flash' width="250" height="250" data='http://www.youtube.com/v/FT4YbO_1mvA&autoplay=1'>
<param name='AllowScriptAccess' value='never' />
<param name='wmode' value='transparent' />
<param name='movie' value='http://www.youtube.com/v/FT4YbO_1mvA&autoplay=1' /><param name='play' value='true' />
<param name='loop' value='true' /><param name='quality' value='high' /></object>
 
Back
Top