Video Chat Confirmed for Pok

[Tyeforce]

Good lord, do people really read all these essay length posts?

Probably not. Which makes me wonder why I even bother saying all that I do if the people I'm arguing with aren't even going to listen to me.

They don't want to listen, Tye. :< People like different things, and facts often don't sway opinions.

Moral of the story: It's okay for everyone to like different things, right? =D

It's okay everyone to like different things, yes, but ignoring facts when they're presented to you isn't right, especially when people who do so go even further and try to be rude about it as well.

 

[Ciaran]

Quoting limited to 4 levels deepI'm

You know damn well what ignorance means, so don't act stupid. Ignorance, by definition, is lack of knowledge or information, which includes, of course, ignoring details and disregarding facts.

I am aware of what it means, I wanted to know what your definition was, because you wrongly used it 40+ times in this thread.

No-one 'ignored' any givin facts, we just think it's stupid.

Don't play stupid. Ignorance has a broad definition that encompasses many situations. Most of the time when I use it, it's used in the sense that people are being ignorant of (meaning disregarding or ignoring) the fact that people have different preferences and interests, so you're opinion isn't a fact like you think it is. Or, in the case of this thread, people are being ignorant of the actually subject and reason why I posted it, which was first and foremost to inform people. Instead, people start jumping to conclusions and stating their baseless opinions on a feature that we don't even know much about yet as fact, which is, again, ignorance.

The amount of hypocrisy and sheer lack of language skill and nonsense in that post makes it impossible to respond to with even a morsel of intelligence.

Take a class, foo'

 

[Ron Ronaldo]

Good lord, do people really read all these essay length posts?

Probably not. Which makes me wonder why I even bother saying all that I do if the people I'm arguing with aren't even going to listen to me.

They don't want to listen, Tye. :< People like different things, and facts often don't sway opinions.

Moral of the story: It's okay for everyone to like different things, right? =D

It's okay everyone to like different things, yes, but ignoring facts when they're presented to you isn't right, especially when people who do so go even further and try to be rude about it as well.

But then they're not worth arguing with, right?

Rise above, Tye :>

 

[Tyeforce]

I read everything that tye posted, and tried to reply to everything he said, but so much was restated that it gets difficult to respond to him, and what he said to 3 other people, along with myself, and saying more than "you're wrong because I'm right"

oh god this thread.

I'm not saying "you're wrong because I'm right". That's more like what you're trying to say. I, on the other hand, respond with facts and logic, and reasons as to why I believe what I do, and all the while trying to get you to understand that we both have different interests, and that's okay. But you seem to think that my preferences are wrong, instead of just letting it go, accepting the fact that we're different.

 

[Ciaran]

I read everything that tye posted, and tried to reply to everything he said, but so much was restated that it gets difficult to respond to him, and what he said to 3 other people, along with myself, and saying more than "you're wrong because I'm right"

oh god this thread.

I'm not saying "you're wrong because I'm right". That's more like what you're trying to say. I, on the other hand, respond with facts and logic, and reasons as to why I believe what I do, and all the while trying to get you to understand that we both have different interests, and that's okay. But you seem to think that my preferences are wrong, instead of just letting it go, accepting the fact that we're different.

Give me three examples of when we called you 'wrong' without giving a reason

 

[Tyeforce]

Quoting limited to 4 levels deepI'm

I am aware of what it means, I wanted to know what your definition was, because you wrongly used it 40+ times in this thread.

No-one 'ignored' any givin facts, we just think it's stupid.

Don't play stupid. Ignorance has a broad definition that encompasses many situations. Most of the time when I use it, it's used in the sense that people are being ignorant of (meaning disregarding or ignoring) the fact that people have different preferences and interests, so you're opinion isn't a fact like you think it is. Or, in the case of this thread, people are being ignorant of the actually subject and reason why I posted it, which was first and foremost to inform people. Instead, people start jumping to conclusions and stating their baseless opinions on a feature that we don't even know much about yet as fact, which is, again, ignorance.

The amount of hypocrisy and sheer lack of language skill and nonsense in that post makes it impossible to respond to with even a morsel of intelligence.

Take a class, foo'

You need to find a better hobby than trolling an Animal Crossing forum, you know.

You see, the great thing about being a troll is that you can say whatever you want, regardless of whether it's really true or not, and you'll still piss off your target. You've got the idea down pretty well, as you're plain as day telling me that my posts aren't making any sense at all that that I should "take a class, foo'", which is a prime example of ignorance at its finest, and also a prime example of irony, since we're in an argument about ignorance. But, alas, believing that a troll will ever listen to reason is just plain foolish, so why do I even bother?

 

[Psychonaut]

I read everything that tye posted, and tried to reply to everything he said, but so much was restated that it gets difficult to respond to him, and what he said to 3 other people, along with myself, and saying more than "you're wrong because I'm right"

oh god this thread.

I'm not saying "you're wrong because I'm right". That's more like what you're trying to say. I, on the other hand, respond with facts and logic, and reasons as to why I believe what I do, and all the while trying to get you to understand that we both have different interests, and that's okay. But you seem to think that my preferences are wrong, instead of just letting it go, accepting the fact that we're different.

when you're saying that nintendo isn't just throwing the same game with a new shiny feature tacked on... then no, you aren't responding with facts and logic, in my opinion.

if you read/understood what I said, you would at least be able to agree with certain games being masterpieces, and being so because they aren't the same damn game that we've been handed on a silver platter 4 times before, ex: pokemon, silver platter being video chat, this time.

there will be new features, yes, but on the topic of solely video chat, it is unnecessary in any video game, and this is what I am/was focusing on.

also, you didn't say what city folk added from wild world, instead you branded my entire post as ignorant due to the fact that I have said so much of the same crap to you without any understanding, that I am constantly repeating myself to the point of boredom.

personal attacks, gogogo

I said nothing about your preferences, please quote where I did... I'm sorry if so

this debate/argument/conversation has grown stale, y/n?

 

[Psychonaut]

And as I have said many times before; Your boyfriend has depression, shouldn't you be putting plasters on his wrists instead of typing out giant barriers of text on an animal crossing forum??

and the topic is pokemon, ladies and gentlemen.

what has science done.



any new news on the video chat being in-game, etc?

 

[DarthGohan1]

Grow up and stop bickering about pointless things. You can't have an argument if you're the bigger man and don't respond to ridiculous accusations. It's sad that such a good thread turned into an argument about who's more ignorant... the not-so-ignorant thing to do would be to not bicker about meaningless things, such as the definition of ignorant.