Mafia Real Housewives of Mafia! The Reckoning - THE END

[Damniel]

I don't even necessarily think he's scum, he's just the biggest red flag in my mind so far today.

?

why

 

[toadsworthy]

Day ends in a little under 4 hours

- - - Post Merge - - -

Also I’m home and gonna be by myself for the holidays so I will be more on track from now on

 

[Trent the Paladin]

My claim is serious and my intention to no lynch is serious as it's been any time I suggested it, which is serious. Working so obviously my response will be short and non joking, but if there's Q's for me besides this feel free to drop em and I'll answer on my break or when I get off

 

[Damniel]

tom why are you still supportive of a no lynch despite the discussions in the game. what’re your thoughts on everyone?

 

[SensaiGallade]

Ok well I'm gonna go with my gut for now and vote Trundle and see if anything happens between now and EoD

 

[Trent the Paladin]

tom why are you still supportive of a no lynch despite the discussions in the game. what’re your thoughts on everyone?

To be honest I only really skimmed at the time of posting, but nothing immediately jumped out as necessary voting but I'll reread. But I am currently determined to no lynch because on Day One, what does lynching really net us? In larger games sure, a day one lynch makes a bit more sense to do as town greatly outnumbers mafia. Here we're probably against two mafia types? Lynching and possibly mislynching harms us more in my opinion. I would rather wait until Day Two to go hard because ideally we collectively will have more to go off of. I'll post thoughts with a follow up after a reread, but like it'll likely be sentence each. Signed up for fun, not here for essay type sludge.

 

[cornimer]

Yes 'tis I

Normally I wouldn't advocate for no lynch but if the remainder of this day is this slow, I would support no lynch. At this rate a lynch would feel like pulling a name out of a hat. Jacob raises a fair point about it encouraging inactivity but like...there are literally two pages of posts right now and the day is more than half over. I do want to know if Tom's no lynch suggestion was serious or just a meme though.

vanessa i?m not really understanding your logic. it?s seems that your reasoning makes more sense as to why we should lynch instead of no lynch. can you elaborate on this?

My logic was that with so little content in the thread, nobody likely has any strong convictions about anyone (at least I don't anyways, I never have good reads until day 2). So if we lynched someone, we would just be lynching for the sake of lynching, and not lynching because we think we will find scum. If we aren't confident about who we are lynching we will likely just hit town and hurt our numbers.

- - - Post Merge - - -

^ Tom summed it up pretty well above me

- - - Post Merge - - -

Should I remind you of the game played I can't remember the name of where Vanessa was maf and everyone was convinced she was town.

That was the RHOM part one lol

- - - Post Merge - - -

Damniel is a townlean for me at the moment, but honestly I haven't played in so long I don't remember behaviours.

So far multiple people have defended Tom's first post which seems a bit weird. I'm curious if there is scum between unravel and cornimer that might be trying to low-key advocate a no lynch. Personally I think we should lynch Rosetti if she doesn't show up by end of day. If she's town, that sucks, but if she's mafia, we are a huge leg up on the game.

I don't like this logic because Rosie isn't guaranteed to be modkilled right now. You only have to vote once every two days to stay in, and she still has the night phase to make a contribution. It would be wasteful to lynch her to avoid modkill when she is not guaranteed to be modkilled, plus we have zero information regarding her alignment.

- - - Post Merge - - -

Why lynch Rosetti? I'm against lynching someone who hasn't shown up yet bc if she doesn't show up at all then she'll most likely be replaced/modkilled anyways. This seems to be like an attempt at an easy lynch tbh

Also another thing that's come to mind is your RQS. You said you don't like RQS for being dumb (which i can get) and you create on to try to spark discussion. I get the reasoning why you'd make one even if you said you don't like them, but I don't get why you made the questions so irrelevant to the game. To me it just seems like you wanted to appear like a contributing member who started discussion, but asked trivial questions

I'm still down for lynching Tom, but, after some thinking, I'm going to be voting for Trundle

I might have just missed an earlier post, but why are you suspicious of Tom? I don't see any red flags from him.

- - - Post Merge - - -

Whoops gtg dinner

 

[Damniel]

okay so I def think we should lynch today since I personally believe it'll get the game going by looking at everyone's reactions to voting

that being said my strongest townlean atm is Jacob. And if I were to lynch someone rn, I'd vote Tom for being active from the start but not contributing much yet

This is when I first talked about Tom. It's not the strongest since he doesn't seem the most interested in the game, but my suspicions are still there. I'm way more for lynching Trundle tho and prefer lynching him over no lynch

 

[rosetti]

okay so after reading over everything,

I’m town leaning Daniel and Jacob the most right now, they’ve contributed significantly and have both made good points/observations, Daniel is leading town the most by picking up on a lot of stuff /nitpicking and taking the initiative to directly ask people questions more so than anyone else

Trundle/Aiden has also contributed a bit, more so at the start but his reasonings aren’t as sound or as well thought out in my opinion, kinda more like whims? Also going from lynching me to wanting to lynch Jacob kinda quick seemed a bit off, maybe because Daniel questioned his logic? But then having nothing but ‘gut feeling’ for voting Jacob when he just criticised Jacob at the start for having gut feelings on 4 people statistically??? But maybe he’s just putting his vote in for now? He didn’t seem too serious about it.. but it also doesn’t add up well with his whole behaviour so far, so seems the most sus as of rn

Tom seems genuine to me, I think his statements are serious and he’s just chilling out a bit, I’d like to see him read more but he’s explained why/ his attitude towards this game which is fair

Sensai/Aaron didn’t contribute much until Daniel directly asked him what his thoughts were, however his reads seem pretty sound, he just seems a bit unsure? But he’s trying

Cornimer/Vanessa is the only other one who was advocating for no lynch, I kinda understand the reasoning but it just feels more proactive to get a lynch in now rather than sitting back waiting, however tom and Vanessa are both more experienced players (i think idk I’m still a lil noob lol) so I’m guessing its a strategic town stance???? Maybe????? Feels more like suggesting town to chill and not work together though? So I’m not completely convinced on it but more so cause I’m just unsure

Unravel hasn’t contributed significantly at all yet (neither have i really so i might sound a bit hypocritical here but whatever) they only answered the rqs and briefly stated a couple of points/thoughts, they took no initiative to ask questions or further read anyone else, they might just be totally unbothered but sitting back this much is a lil sus to me, hopefully we can hear more from them

So overall, I’m not completely dead set on voting anyone yet, the odds are stacking up towards trundle but I’m hoping he’ll come in and defend himself or at least provide more reasoning to his vote if he sticks with it? I’m also leaning towards unravel but not majorly since they’ve literally only made one post which wasn’t much to go off anyway

- - - Post Merge - - -

Also does any1 know the time zone for this games voting? I’m in gmt so I’m unsure about when I’ve got to get a vote in, since it’s currently 11:29 pm rn and i cant rly be up much longer

 

[SensaiGallade]

quote

1am rosie

 

[Damniel]

sensai who are you thinking of voting for/do you want a no lynch

 

[SensaiGallade]

Quickly adding before I go to bed but Unravel has posted like once so would she be content with being inactive like this if she was maf? I don't thinks she should be put up for lynch right now but if she was maf then surely we would have some activity out of her?

- - - Post Merge - - -

sensai who are you thinking of voting for/do you want a no lynch

Votes on Trundle rn but what Tom said does make a lot of sense. At the same time we don't know what maf is capable of doing at night at this time so we could bite more than we can chew if we lynch or go for a no lynch.

 

[Damniel]

Quickly adding before I go to bed but Unravel has posted like once so would she be content with being inactive like this if she was maf? I don't thinks she should be put up for lynch right now but if she was maf then surely we would have some activity out of her?

eh I would wait until D2 to really start questioning activity. There's always a good chance one's busy irl for a time period so I'd rather give them some time to see if they're coasting or just inactive

- - - Post Merge - - -

no lynch always sounds more of a cop out to me unless its for late game when roles are more apparent and numbers are critical. it would be easy to just throw our hands and see what happens N2 but I'd rather put pressure on people and see what comes from it. I've always found lynches to be more fruitful in terms of content. Yea there's always the possibility we're risking numbers but we don't really know the setup to know that for sure. I think a lynch would propel the game towards greater productivity/fun

 

[Trent the Paladin]

okay so I def think we should lynch today since I personally believe it'll get the game going by looking at everyone's reactions to voting

I agree with you on the lynch stance, a lynch today would get the game going and create more discussion..

Honestly I'd keep a closer eye on those more eager to lynch right away, given how much of dud Day One has been outside of the last what seven hours? Day One is just ripe for mislynching and while it would give us something to look at, I just don't see the value in doing so. I think we're generating enough discussion by just talking about potentially voting somebody.

that being said my strongest townlean atm is Jacob. And if I were to lynch someone rn, I'd vote Tom for being active from the start but not contributing much yet

While I had a closer eye on the thread yesterday, I didn't see much of a point in making posts for the sake of making posts if only half the players had checked in. What would you have preferred to see from me, because frankly I thought I announcing my role and my intentions for the day would generate more discussion than it did but everyone seems more inclined to focus less on my role or more on why I want to vote a no lynch.

Hi I personally think Tom's post is just only way to keep the game active so lets disregard that

Which post would that have been? My opener? I don't see a reason to disregard it, if anything saying that just draws more attention to yourself which confuses me. Two of my first three posts may not have been quality, but post uno is something at least.

I don't like this logic because Rosie isn't guaranteed to be modkilled right now. You only have to vote once every two days to stay in, and she still has the night phase to make a contribution. It would be wasteful to lynch her to avoid modkill when she is not guaranteed to be modkilled, plus we have zero information regarding her alignment.

Not only does lynching Rosie just because net us nothing, but it robs us of a potential active replacement. Taking Rosie's only post (at the time I was writing this) at face value, familial issues arose and if needed, she can drop out while somebody else enters the thunderdome. Naturally if this was a mandatory player must be lynched game, I would potentially go with Trundle because his logic behind wanting to have voted for Rosie seems faulty to me but given that the OP doesn't mention replacements, rules, etc I could kind of see where he was trying to go.

---

Town leaning Damniel for trying to get things going, Vanessa generally because I find nothing objectionable with her posts, Rosie for catching up and trying to contribute D1. If you must know, that's in order of how favorable this lean is at the moment to shaky.

Mixed on Sensai. He seems to be observing more right than playing, but given Day One I can't really fault him.

Sus of Trundle, unravel, and Jacob (I can never read him honestly and opt to read him as a cool, collected villainous type).

---

Tom seems genuine to me, I think his statements are serious and he?s just chilling out a bit, I?d like to see him read more but he?s explained why/ his attitude towards this game which is fair

Honestly I'm not expecting a lot from this game given that it is the holidays, everyone is busy getting last minute gifts or wrapping or traveling and whatnot. No lynch makes perfect sense at the moment because we're only just now getting productive with the thread with just little over an hour to go before EoD. Joined the game purely to have fun, which is what my goal is to do right now.

 

[Damniel]

I didn't realize you were serious about your role claim until you confirmed it earlier. not sure what kind of discussion you were hoping to get out of it since miller is a pretty easy role to claim

 

[toadsworthy]

1hr till end of voting period

Trundle is set to be lynched

 

[Trent the Paladin]

I didn't realize you were serious about your role claim until you confirmed it earlier. not sure what kind of discussion you were hoping to get out of it since miller is a pretty easy role to claim

Damn ya'll really saw the uwu and threw my post in the trash (where it probably rightfully belongs). Miller is an easy claim, but I figured it would open the thread up with some back and forth about whether or not I was being genuine about my role.

 

[rosetti]

Just a Q, if the no lynch vote outnumbers whatever the highest vote for a player is does that mean there’s no lynch? or is it like a placeholder vote? sorry this is probably a dumb q i’m just not sure lol

 

[toadsworthy]

Just a Q, if the no lynch vote outnumbers whatever the highest vote for a player is does that mean there’s no lynch? or is it like a placeholder vote? sorry this is probably a dumb q i’m just not sure lol

Yes, if more people vote NO LYNCH than an actual player then no one will be lynched that day

 

[Jacob]

I think I'm gonna vote between Waffles, Vanessa and Sensai, they're all staying particularly "back" a bit to me. Rosie came in and made a post that felt really effortful and genuine and town to me and I think she's the most inexperienced, so thats where my red flags are raised. I know all 3 of them are good players so I don't really feel good that their posts are so safe and reserved

I looked back on Waffles last game (I think she was mafia????) and she looked way more into the rqs and everything so I'm inclined to think she's just an unpressed/uninterested town at this point, and vanessa's larger post felt a bit more town to me than she had before. I'm definitely gonna wait a bit more but I think my vote is gonna end up on Sensai today ?