Poll on Warnings / Bannings

[Jeremy]

This one is a little bit more clear and maybe *certain people* will be able to present their opinion in a mature, friendly way.

 

[Jas0n]

Yay for 3 threads xD

You're worse than those spammers, Jeremy :O

 

[Tyeforce]

"Moderation is not strict enough" for me.

 

[Silverstorms]

Could be a bit stricter.

 

[cornymikey]

I think its fine

 

[Conor]

Its Fine.

 

[SamXX]

Could be stricter on how warnings are given in my opinion.

 

[Tyeforce]

Continuing from the last thread...

More bans? No thanks. I've gotten suspended for making a sexual joke I didn't even mean to make before. Storm doesn't need more of a reason to ban me.

True... Some of the things that people get banned for are just ridiculous. Someone gets banned if they make a sexual joke that doesn't even offend anyone, but constant flamers don't? Yeah, that makes sense.

 

[Jas0n]

Continuing from the last thread...

More bans? No thanks. I've gotten suspended for making a sexual joke I didn't even mean to make before. Storm doesn't need more of a reason to ban me.

True... Some of the things that people get banned for are just ridiculous. Someone gets banned if they make a sexual joke that doesn't even offend anyone, but constant flamers don't? Yeah, that makes sense.

^

 

[MattyofAlbion]

its a little too strict if u ask me...
when u suspended me i didnt even get a chance to look at the PM about why i was
suspended till I got back...not really useful then is it?

 

[Jeremy]

its a little too strict if u ask me...
when u suspended me i didnt even get a chance to look at the PM about why i was
suspended till I got back...not really useful then is it?

The PM is so you know when you get back. But Jas0n would have you banned for 2 weeks. <.<

Wouldn't that just irritate you instead of "teach you more of a lesson"

It's not like you are a mass-spammer (as of now)

 

[Kanye Omari West]

Choice 5.

 

[Thunder]

You know what's weird? It's strict.... But not strict enough.. Get what i'm saying?

 

[Tyeforce]

Continuing from the last thread...

More bans? No thanks. I've gotten suspended for making a sexual joke I didn't even mean to make before. Storm doesn't need more of a reason to ban me.

True... Some of the things that people get banned for are just ridiculous. Someone gets banned if they make a sexual joke that doesn't even offend anyone, but constant flamers don't? Yeah, that makes sense.

^

^

 

[Kanye Omari West]

Yeah, I get it.
Someone can flame another, but at the same time, the mods can do stupid things that aren't fair at times.

 

[Kanye Omari West]

Now, I had to pick choice 5. We've got 60,000 members, and most of the time, the mods are on at the wrong times.
I never see Sporge or Grawr.
I see Nigel every now and then.
To be honest, I flamed a kid one time, and Nigel read it and didn't even hand me a warning or tell me to stop >_>

 

[djman900]

2 strict i got 10% warn for posting "ok" and then "lol" on a topic

 

[Liv]

I said that it's the way it should be. Except for one thing, You should make one of those locked threads that only Mod. or Adm. can post or edit about all the consequences that will happen if you break a rule. In effect users may not make mistakes about posting something that may be offensive. Oh ya one more thing, there is this one users who should totally get banned, but no she has not! There is a whole page of her spamming if you don't believe me PM me for the culprit and the evidence!

 

[Conor]

I think you should have two Mods from the US and 2 Mods from the UK, that would help quite a bit because I never see Grawr or Sporge but I see DarthGohan and Nigel quite a bit.

 

[Kanye Omari West]

I think you should have to Mods from the US and 2 Mods from the UK, that would help quite a bit because I never see Grawr or Sporge but I see DarthGohan and Nigel quite a bit.

I haven't seen Darth in ages.
He also warned me for bumping a topic, and it was becoming popular too..

Plus, we'd need more US mods then just 2.
3 or 4 can do.

Or 1 for every time zone in the US.