Order the best three next gen system

[Garrett x50 cal]

Wii,PS3, 360

My reason? Because I own the Wii and it rocks...Graphics are not the whole game ya know...
PS3 has been catching my attention quite a lot lately and I am now thinking of getting one! 360 is THE worst built system of all of the three systems... I am not saying 360's game suck. On the contrary! It has some REALLY good games! BUT! The red ring tells me otherwise... and some other things... I might just make a thread about why later...

Agreed.

Microsoft rushed the 360 just so they could get it out before the Wii and PS3 and they still haven't worked out all the issues with it >_>

little fact microsoft didn't make the 360 they gave permission to some other company to make it but they used mircosoft for the name...

 

[Dragorium15]

360=PC>Wii>PS3

 

[TheSonyMan]

Well lets look at the facts, The ps3 is the most powerful of all 3 consoles. While it dosent have as many games as the 360 the games that have been released thus far on the ps3 look far more better than any 360 or wii game ever. The ps3 makes up for not having hundreds of genric shootan or rehashes of games by having a number of different games and the quality and content of thos games being greater than any content on the other 2 consoles. Like sony said at 08 e3, "we just dont release game after game to say we have more, we spend time on them to assure the quality and content of the game is suitable for our customers".

For the 360, there are so many hardware problems. Buying a 360 is like gambling, it may fail at any moment or it may not. Yeah sure, there are thousands of games but most of them lack the quality or "fun" of any wii or ps3 game. Another thing is you have to pay for the online play. Sony's playstation network has all the same features as live plus some free stuff and Playstation Home(virtual hangout for friends) and it is all for FREE. With the PSN you get the same experience with Live.

With the wii... the least powerful of the consoles, least memory storage, least everything. It is the best selling console, but its not the best. The games are old rehashes of our favorite past nintendo titles, shovel ware and casual titles. This is not bad but Nintendo is not on the level of the other 2 consoles. They tried to bring voice chat to their terrible online system but somehow made that "Casual" too making it so the whole room can chat in your game which is really stupid. A simple update will allow them to use blutooth headsets a simple update. Nintendo has always been known for their "kiddy" image and has boosted that by 10000%.


And of course the PC owns all of them no contest but anyway for me I choose

1.PS3

2. 360

3. Wii

 

[Dragorium15]

Well lets look at the facts, The ps3 is the most powerful of all 3 consoles. While it dosent have as many games as the 360 the games that have been released thus far on the ps3 look far more better than any 360 or wii game ever. The ps3 makes up for not having hundreds of genric shootan or rehashes of games by having a number of different games and the quality and content of thos games being greater than any content on the other 2 consoles. Like sony said at 08 e3, "we just dont release game after game to say we have more, we spend time on them to assure the quality and content of the game is suitable for our customers".

The funny thing is, it actually isn't. The 360 has a more powerful processor and a more powerful graphics card. The whole thing about the "PS3 having better graphics" is completely false. The 360 actually does. And the whole hardware failure on 360 is essentially nonexistant now, so that argument is naught.

 

[SL92]

Lawl@TheSonyMan's entire post.

 

[TheSonyMan]

Well lets look at the facts, The ps3 is the most powerful of all 3 consoles. While it dosent have as many games as the 360 the games that have been released thus far on the ps3 look far more better than any 360 or wii game ever. The ps3 makes up for not having hundreds of genric shootan or rehashes of games by having a number of different games and the quality and content of thos games being greater than any content on the other 2 consoles. Like sony said at 08 e3, "we just dont release game after game to say we have more, we spend time on them to assure the quality and content of the game is suitable for our customers".

The funny thing is, it actually isn't. The 360 has a more powerful processor and a more powerful graphics card. The whole thing about the "PS3 having better graphics" is completely false. The 360 actually does. And the whole hardware failure on 360 is essentially nonexistant now, so that argument is naught.

Where is your proof that the360 has a better porocessor or graphiucs card?

 

[Dragorium15]

http://www.hardcoreware.net/reviews/review-348-1.htm

That's a comparison done by a developer of both Sony and Microsoft.

 

[TheSonyMan]

PS3 Graphics550 MHz NVIDIA/SCEI RSX 'Reality Synthesizer'

360 Graphics500 MHz ATI Xenos

______________________________________________

Ps3 Processor: 3.2 GHz Cell Broadband Engine with 1 PPE & 7 SPEs

360 Processor: 3.2 GHz PowerPC Tri-Core Xenon

Cell> Xenon

Reality Synthesizer> Xenos


Now if you dont trust that, look at high quality videos of any 360 game the one you tihnk looks the best, and then look at Killzone 2 for the ps3 and tell me the game you think looks better than it.

 

[Dragorium15]

PS3 Graphics550 MHz NVIDIA/SCEI RSX 'Reality Synthesizer'

360 Graphics500 MHz ATI Xenos

______________________________________________

Ps3 Processor: 3.2 GHz Cell Broadband Engine with 1 PPE & 7 SPEs

360 Processor: 3.2 GHz PowerPC Tri-Core Xenon

Cell> Xenon

Reality Synthesizer> Xenos

Lawl, not even reading the article.

 

[TheSonyMan]

PS3 Graphics550 MHz NVIDIA/SCEI RSX 'Reality Synthesizer'

360 Graphics500 MHz ATI Xenos

______________________________________________

Ps3 Processor: 3.2 GHz Cell Broadband Engine with 1 PPE & 7 SPEs

360 Processor: 3.2 GHz PowerPC Tri-Core Xenon

Cell> Xenon

Reality Synthesizer> Xenos

Lawl, not even reading the article.

I read the article, it was a load of bull. The cell processor not even being fully used at about 33% can render the graphics of Killzone 2 which in reallity look better than any 360 game or any other video game to date, probably only Crysis on a super 5,000$ compute ron high settings can compete.

 

[Dragorium15]

PS3 Graphics550 MHz NVIDIA/SCEI RSX 'Reality Synthesizer'

360 Graphics500 MHz ATI Xenos

______________________________________________

Ps3 Processor: 3.2 GHz Cell Broadband Engine with 1 PPE & 7 SPEs

360 Processor: 3.2 GHz PowerPC Tri-Core Xenon

Cell> Xenon

Reality Synthesizer> Xenos

Lawl, not even reading the article.

I read the article, it was a load of bull. The cell processor not even being fully used at about 33% can render the graphics of Killzone 2 which in reallity look better than any 360 game or any other video game to date, probably only Crysis on a super 5,000$ compute ron high settings can compete.

And this is where you fail.

The article was written by a developer of both companies: he knows which system is easier to develop for and has more power behind it. This "load of bull" is a comparison done by a developer, to determine which system is better.

You're just too blinded by Sony's marketing team to realize the truth when you see it.

 

[TheSonyMan]

PS3 Graphics550 MHz NVIDIA/SCEI RSX 'Reality Synthesizer'

360 Graphics500 MHz ATI Xenos

______________________________________________

Ps3 Processor: 3.2 GHz Cell Broadband Engine with 1 PPE & 7 SPEs

360 Processor: 3.2 GHz PowerPC Tri-Core Xenon

Cell> Xenon

Reality Synthesizer> Xenos

Lawl, not even reading the article.

I read the article, it was a load of bull. The cell processor not even being fully used at about 33% can render the graphics of Killzone 2 which in reallity look better than any 360 game or any other video game to date, probably only Crysis on a super 5,000$ compute ron high settings can compete.

And this is where you fail.

The article was written by a developer of both companies: he knows which system is easier to develop for and has more power behind it. This "load of bull" is a comparison done by a developer, to determine which system is better.

You're just too blinded by Sony's marketing team to realize the truth when you see it.

You still dont understand, the actuall facts come down to the ps3 having the more powerful hardware and the games it has arent rehashes are genric fps's.

 

[Dragorium15]

PS3 Graphics550 MHz NVIDIA/SCEI RSX 'Reality Synthesizer'

360 Graphics500 MHz ATI Xenos

______________________________________________

Ps3 Processor: 3.2 GHz Cell Broadband Engine with 1 PPE & 7 SPEs

360 Processor: 3.2 GHz PowerPC Tri-Core Xenon

Cell> Xenon

Reality Synthesizer> Xenos

Lawl, not even reading the article.

I read the article, it was a load of bull. The cell processor not even being fully used at about 33% can render the graphics of Killzone 2 which in reallity look better than any 360 game or any other video game to date, probably only Crysis on a super 5,000$ compute ron high settings can compete.

And this is where you fail.

The article was written by a developer of both companies: he knows which system is easier to develop for and has more power behind it. This "load of bull" is a comparison done by a developer, to determine which system is better.

You're just too blinded by Sony's marketing team to realize the truth when you see it.

You still dont understand, the actuall facts come down to the ps3 having the more powerful hardware and the games it has arent rehashes are genric fps's.

No, it's YOU who doesn't understand. The 360 has more exclusives than the PS3 does, most of which are NOT "generic FPS's" and most are acclaimed as being some of the best games released. Case in point: Halo 3. Most people call it a "generic FPS" correct? Then how did it make the most money for ANY entertainment release in history?

And your argument about the systems being more powerful still has no basis, due to the fact you aren't providing any evidence to back it up. I at least showed you mine and you're still being too stupid to realize that your arguments are essentially void.

 

[TheSonyMan]

Quoting limited to 5 levels deep

I read the article, it was a load of bull. The cell processor not even being fully used at about 33% can render the graphics of Killzone 2 which in reallity look better than any 360 game or any other video game to date, probably only Crysis on a super 5,000$ compute ron high settings can compete.

And this is where you fail.

The article was written by a developer of both companies: he knows which system is easier to develop for and has more power behind it. This "load of bull" is a comparison done by a developer, to determine which system is better.

You're just too blinded by Sony's marketing team to realize the truth when you see it.

You still dont understand, the actuall facts come down to the ps3 having the more powerful hardware and the games it has arent rehashes are genric fps's.

No, it's YOU who doesn't understand. The 360 has more exclusives than the PS3 does, most of which are NOT "generic FPS's" and most are acclaimed as being some of the best games released. Case in point: Halo 3. Most people call it a "generic FPS" correct? Then how did it make the most money for ANY entertainment release in history?

And your argument about the systems being more powerful still has no basis, due to the fact you aren't providing any evidence to back it up. I at least showed you mine and you're still being too stupid to realize that your arguments are essentially void.

It has MORE exclusives but are those exclusives ACTUALLY GOOD? qUALITY OVER QUANTITIY MY FRIEND

 

[Jas0n]

Console wars are the lamest things on the face of this planet, even worse than Mac vs PC debates.

 

[SL92]

Console wars are the lamest things on the face of this planet, even worse than Mac vs PC debates.

I'm going with Jason on this one.

I'm a pretty damn impartial person.

 

[Dragorium15]

Console wars are the lamest things on the face of this planet, even worse than Mac vs PC debates.

I agree, but alas, here we are.

@TheSonyMan: That is completely opinion. However, there are more games with higher ratings that are exclusive to 360 than to PS3. Plus a lot of the high-rated exclusives for 360 got transferred to PS3 after the popularity skyrocketed and there was massive public outcry for them to become multi-console.

 

[TheSonyMan]

Console wars are the lamest things on the face of this planet, even worse than Mac vs PC debates.

I agree, but alas, here we are.

@TheSonyMan: That is completely opinion. However, there are more games with higher ratings that are exclusive to 360 than to PS3. Plus a lot of the high-rated exclusives for 360 got transferred to PS3 after the popularity skyrocketed and there was massive public outcry for them to become multi-console.

QUALITY OVER QUANTITIY. I rather have 10 good games full of content than 1,000 short games with no replay value.

 

[Megamannt125]

Console wars are the lamest things on the face of this planet, even worse than Mac vs PC debates.

I agree, but alas, here we are.

@TheSonyMan: That is completely opinion. However, there are more games with higher ratings that are exclusive to 360 than to PS3. Plus a lot of the high-rated exclusives for 360 got transferred to PS3 after the popularity skyrocketed and there was massive public outcry for them to become multi-console.

QUALITY OVER QUANTITIY. I rather have 10 good games full of content than 1,000 short games with no replay value.

I didn't want to get into this but are you saying Nintendo games have no replay value? That is your opinion, not fact, there are plenty of Nintendo Games I have played multiple times.

 

[Dragorium15]

Console wars are the lamest things on the face of this planet, even worse than Mac vs PC debates.

I agree, but alas, here we are.

@TheSonyMan: That is completely opinion. However, there are more games with higher ratings that are exclusive to 360 than to PS3. Plus a lot of the high-rated exclusives for 360 got transferred to PS3 after the popularity skyrocketed and there was massive public outcry for them to become multi-console.

QUALITY OVER QUANTITIY. I rather have 10 good games full of content than 1,000 short games with no replay value.

That made me laugh.

None of the games I own are short and all of them have massive replay value.