Cuil

Sporge27 said:
Search by relevance as opposed to popularity? How exactly do they get the program to do this?

Aside from pages containing the words specified and the amount that it is, I cannot see a very simple way to judge relevance. Popularity is actually a decent indication of it because it shows what most people think of given the terms you entered, it isn't perfect but sorting by relevance just seems so vague and more based on the opinion of the site than of actual people.
I dunno how they do it, but it works, and it's better than Google. Ironically, the developers of Cuil are former employees of Google, lol.
 
Tyeforce said:
Sporge27 said:
Search by relevance as opposed to popularity? How exactly do they get the program to do this?

Aside from pages containing the words specified and the amount that it is, I cannot see a very simple way to judge relevance. Popularity is actually a decent indication of it because it shows what most people think of given the terms you entered, it isn't perfect but sorting by relevance just seems so vague and more based on the opinion of the site than of actual people.
I dunno how they do it, but it works, and it's better than Google. Ironically, the developers of Cuil are former employees of Google, lol.
Google has less crap, it's simple and straight foward.
 
Numner said:
Tyeforce said:
Sporge27 said:
Search by relevance as opposed to popularity? How exactly do they get the program to do this?

Aside from pages containing the words specified and the amount that it is, I cannot see a very simple way to judge relevance. Popularity is actually a decent indication of it because it shows what most people think of given the terms you entered, it isn't perfect but sorting by relevance just seems so vague and more based on the opinion of the site than of actual people.
I dunno how they do it, but it works, and it's better than Google. Ironically, the developers of Cuil are former employees of Google, lol.
Google has less crap, it's simple and straight foward.
Lol, no. Google has far more crap. Their ads are everywhere.
 
Honestly, Google is much better for me. I tried searching some lyrics to a song I didn't know the name of, and Google found it in the first hit, while Cuil had no results whatsoever.
 
Sporge27 said:
Ah but the ads fund them to make more products and features.
So they can make more products to fill with their ads? Honestly, Google wouldn't be hurt at all if they would get rid of most of their ads. Like Andrew pointed out, they make billions of dollars in a quarter of a year. They have more money than they know what to do with. They should be using it to fix YouTube. I'm getting pretty pissed at seeing "An error occurred, please try again later."
 
Tyeforce said:
Sporge27 said:
Ah but the ads fund them to make more products and features.
So they can make more products to fill with their ads? Honestly, Google wouldn't be hurt at all if they would get rid of most of their ads. Like Andrew pointed out, they make billions of dollars in a quarter of a year. They have more money than they know what to do with. They should be using it to fix YouTube. I'm getting pretty pissed at seeing "An error occurred, please try again later."
I think he said they made that from advertising lol
 
Sporge27 said:
Tyeforce said:
Sporge27 said:
Ah but the ads fund them to make more products and features.
So they can make more products to fill with their ads? Honestly, Google wouldn't be hurt at all if they would get rid of most of their ads. Like Andrew pointed out, they make billions of dollars in a quarter of a year. They have more money than they know what to do with. They should be using it to fix YouTube. I'm getting pretty pissed at seeing "An error occurred, please try again later."
I think he said they made that from advertising lol
He did, and so did I... I'm saying that it wouldn't hurt them at all if they cut their ads and made a little less money.
 
Tyeforce said:
Sporge27 said:
Tyeforce said:
Sporge27 said:
Ah but the ads fund them to make more products and features.
So they can make more products to fill with their ads? Honestly, Google wouldn't be hurt at all if they would get rid of most of their ads. Like Andrew pointed out, they make billions of dollars in a quarter of a year. They have more money than they know what to do with. They should be using it to fix YouTube. I'm getting pretty pissed at seeing "An error occurred, please try again later."
I think he said they made that from advertising lol
He did, and so did I... I'm saying that it wouldn't hurt them at all if they cut their ads and made a little less money.
Why? People work at Google, you know, and that's their livelihood. They're making money from hard work setting stuff up. And then they can stimulate the economy by buying *censored.2.0*.
 
Tyeforce said:
Sporge27 said:
Tyeforce said:
Sporge27 said:
Ah but the ads fund them to make more products and features.
So they can make more products to fill with their ads? Honestly, Google wouldn't be hurt at all if they would get rid of most of their ads. Like Andrew pointed out, they make billions of dollars in a quarter of a year. They have more money than they know what to do with. They should be using it to fix YouTube. I'm getting pretty pissed at seeing "An error occurred, please try again later."
I think he said they made that from advertising lol
He did, and so did I... I'm saying that it wouldn't hurt them at all if they cut their ads and made a little less money.
Why? People work at Google you know, and that's their livelihood. They worked hard to set stuff up, so they should get paid for it. And then they can stimulate the economy by buying *censored.2.0*.
 
Tyeforce said:
He did, and so did I... I'm saying that it wouldn't hurt them at all if they cut their ads and made a little less money.
My logic went as follows.

Google makes money from ads and pretty much only ads now.
You said it wouldn't hurt if they got rid of most of their ads.
hence sounds like you said it wouldn't hurt if they cut most of their profit.

That just doesn't sound like it would hurt...
 
Sporge27 said:
Tyeforce said:
He did, and so did I... I'm saying that it wouldn't hurt them at all if they cut their ads and made a little less money.
My logic went as follows.

Google makes money from ads and pretty much only ads now.
You said it wouldn't hurt if they got rid of most of their ads.
hence sounds like you said it wouldn't hurt if they cut most of their profit.

That just doesn't sound like it would hurt...
Sporge, Tye loves to think that he knows everything about iMac and Windows. All of his information relies on his boyfriend and pretty much every bit of computer information does. I like to see if Shadow Jolteon post stuff about this but Tye does.
 
Sporge27 said:
Tyeforce said:
He did, and so did I... I'm saying that it wouldn't hurt them at all if they cut their ads and made a little less money.
My logic went as follows.

Google makes money from ads and pretty much only ads now.
You said it wouldn't hurt if they got rid of most of their ads.
hence sounds like you said it wouldn't hurt if they cut most of their profit.

That just doesn't sound like it would hurt...
Okay, I shouldn't have said most, but they can still cut a lot and it wouldn't make hardly any difference. And they could be kind enough to give you an option to disable ads, like Cuil does.
 
Mr_Hobo said:
Sporge27 said:
Tyeforce said:
He did, and so did I... I'm saying that it wouldn't hurt them at all if they cut their ads and made a little less money.
My logic went as follows.

Google makes money from ads and pretty much only ads now.
You said it wouldn't hurt if they got rid of most of their ads.
hence sounds like you said it wouldn't hurt if they cut most of their profit.

That just doesn't sound like it would hurt...
Sporge, Tye loves to think that he knows everything about iMac and Windows. All of his information relies on his boyfriend and pretty much every bit of computer information does. I like to see if Shadow Jolteon post stuff about this but Tye does.
Hobo, please get out if all you're going to do is instigate.
 
Tyeforce said:
Sporge27 said:
Tyeforce said:
He did, and so did I... I'm saying that it wouldn't hurt them at all if they cut their ads and made a little less money.
My logic went as follows.

Google makes money from ads and pretty much only ads now.
You said it wouldn't hurt if they got rid of most of their ads.
hence sounds like you said it wouldn't hurt if they cut most of their profit.

That just doesn't sound like it would hurt...
Okay, I shouldn't have said most, but they can still cut a lot and it wouldn't make hardly any difference. And they could be kind enough to give you an option to disable ads, like Cuil does.
They would go bankrupt. Dur Dur
 
Mr_Hobo said:
Sporge27 said:
Tyeforce said:
He did, and so did I... I'm saying that it wouldn't hurt them at all if they cut their ads and made a little less money.
My logic went as follows.

Google makes money from ads and pretty much only ads now.
You said it wouldn't hurt if they got rid of most of their ads.
hence sounds like you said it wouldn't hurt if they cut most of their profit.

That just doesn't sound like it would hurt...
Sporge, Tye loves to think that he knows everything about iMac and Windows. All of his information relies on his boyfriend and pretty much every bit of computer information does. I like to see if Shadow Jolteon post stuff about this but Tye does.
Well that was more business.... and I don't really know business...
 
Back
Top