I used to be forced into church when I was really little, but we eventually just .. stopped going.
I'd consider myself agnostic, I guess.
I'm a Christian but I wouldn't say I'm the type to do what normal Christians would do.
One problem I've heard is that the original text of the Bible has been rewritten so many times it's lost a lot of it's original context, thus making it hard to tell truth from false Belief. I've read some somewhere saying that the original word "eon" in the Bible was meant as a certain extant of time such as a 100 years or so, not eternity.
... I chatted with Hyperion [Zulehan] on Live Messenger and he convinced me to take a different stance on the definition of atheist. I never stopped being agnostic. But I've only ever been agnostic in a purely logical sense. I don't believe there is a God, but logically I could never subscribe to spiritual dogma, for or against. Not at this point.
Agnosticism is usually a quality which modifies an overall belief. Some people believe that there is no god and that is final. They are atheists, and they are with dogma. Some people believe that there is no god, but it's just a feeling or a general estimation. They are agnostic atheists. You could also say atheist agnostic, but that would be nitpicking. Theists of all sorts can be agnostic as well. But without the agnosticism, they are dogmatic. The peculiar thing is that "pure" agnosticism, or what can only be described as just "Agnosticism," is dogmatic as well, in that there is no way to ever know for sure whether or not a god exists.