No, I've seen a bear in the wild. There's no mistaking one, so I think that theory is bogus. Unless everyone who's ever seen Bigfoot is legally blind.lilypad said:I don't believe there is a big foot. It could be easily mistaken for a bear or other animal.
I believe in the Loch Ness Monster. I think it could be possible there is something down there because the lake is very deep after all.
Or just the fact that most Bigfoot sightings have been at night, in some dark woods, or in other low visibility conditions.pear40 said:No, I've seen a bear in the wild. There's no mistaking one, so I think that theory is bogus. Unless everyone who's ever seen Bigfoot is legally blind.lilypad said:I don't believe there is a big foot. It could be easily mistaken for a bear or other animal.
I believe in the Loch Ness Monster. I think it could be possible there is something down there because the lake is very deep after all.
I saw it during twilight, so it was low light.nephewjack said:Or just the fact that most Bigfoot sightings have been at night, in some dark woods, or in other low visibility conditions.pear40 said:No, I've seen a bear in the wild. There's no mistaking one, so I think that theory is bogus. Unless everyone who's ever seen Bigfoot is legally blind.lilypad said:I don't believe there is a big foot. It could be easily mistaken for a bear or other animal.
I believe in the Loch Ness Monster. I think it could be possible there is something down there because the lake is very deep after all.
I've seen a bear too ... But the pictures that people take of this so called big foot just looks like a big fuzzy gorilla/bear/human thing. Combined with bad conditions and lack of photo quality something in the wild such as a bear could be confused as big foot.pear40 said:I saw it during twilight, so it was low light.nephewjack said:Or just the fact that most Bigfoot sightings have been at night, in some dark woods, or in other low visibility conditions.pear40 said:No, I've seen a bear in the wild. There's no mistaking one, so I think that theory is bogus. Unless everyone who's ever seen Bigfoot is legally blind.lilypad said:I don't believe there is a big foot. It could be easily mistaken for a bear or other animal.
I believe in the Loch Ness Monster. I think it could be possible there is something down there because the lake is very deep after all.
That is a very valid point. I just don't think misidentification could play a role in it.lilypad said:I've seen a bear too ... But the pictures that people take of this so called big foot just looks like a big fuzzy gorilla/bear/human thing. Combined with bad conditions and lack of photo quality something in the wild such as a bear could be confused as big foot.pear40 said:I saw it during twilight, so it was low light.nephewjack said:Or just the fact that most Bigfoot sightings have been at night, in some dark woods, or in other low visibility conditions.pear40 said:No, I've seen a bear in the wild. There's no mistaking one, so I think that theory is bogus. Unless everyone who's ever seen Bigfoot is legally blind.lilypad said:I don't believe there is a big foot. It could be easily mistaken for a bear or other animal.
I believe in the Loch Ness Monster. I think it could be possible there is something down there because the lake is very deep after all.
I honestly don't get why they haven't caught it yet if it does exist. It's just a wild animal so it is highly likely that it would have been caught already (if it did exist) since so many people go looking for it.
He did billions of years ago. Scientist have determined that the official dinosaur is a "Plesiosaur".bittermeat said:I hope the Loch Ness monster exists.
But as of Bigfoot, On July 9, 2008, Rick Dyer and Matthew Whitton posted a video on YouTube claiming that they had come across,Two Bigfoot hunters claimed they had the body of an alleged bigfoot and planned to release a photo and what they claimed is DNA evidence at a news conference.![]()
I remember when my parents use to leave me alone at the house...AndyB said:Bigfoot: No. Just some dirty old man. =P
Loch Ness: At sometime or another, it was there.
Aliens: Somewhere, they are there.
Ghosts: Yes, I've had a few encounters.
I smell a political pun. :UBacon Boy said:Bigfoot: DUH! HAVEN'T YOU SEEN HARRY AND THE HENDERSONS?
Loch Ness: A long time ago, sure.
Aliens: Yea, Texas has tons of them!
Ghosts: Not so much ghosts as evil spirits. From a comical perspective: Uh, hell yea. Ghostbusters wasn't just a movie. It was based on a true story!
Tom said:I smell a political pun. :UBacon Boy said:Bigfoot: DUH! HAVEN'T YOU SEEN HARRY AND THE HENDERSONS?
Loch Ness: A long time ago, sure.
Aliens: Yea, Texas has tons of them!
Ghosts: Not so much ghosts as evil spirits. From a comical perspective: Uh, hell yea. Ghostbusters wasn't just a movie. It was based on a true story!
Mr_Hobo said:He did billions of years ago. Scientist have determined that the official dinosaur is a "Plesiosaur".bittermeat said:I hope the Loch Ness monster exists.
As of Bigfoot
But as of Bigfoot, On July 9, 2008, Rick Dyer and Matthew Whitton posted a video on YouTube claiming that they had come across,Two Bigfoot hunters claimed they had the body of an alleged bigfoot and planned to release a photo and what they claimed is DNA evidence at a news conference.![]()
Dragons DID exist. People get ideas from somewhere. They found a 'Dragon' frozen in ice. It breathed tar or something so when it exhaled, it exhaled fire. It could fly because the muscles in its wings were extremely strong, and adaptive to the air at the time.TravisTouchdown said:It's not likely that they exist today. But I do believe that they existed some time ago. Sort of like dragons in the medieval ages.
Some dinosaurs could breathe fire.Palad said:[n,Dec 15 2009, 10:36:47 PM]Dragons DID exist. People get ideas from somewhere. They found a 'Dragon' frozen in ice. It breathed tar or something so when it exhaled, it exhaled fire. It could fly because the muscles in its wings were extremely strong, and adaptive to the air at the time.TravisTouchdown said:It's not likely that they exist today. But I do believe that they existed some time ago. Sort of like dragons in the medieval ages.
Anyway, You should make a poll for this. I like more statistical results.