The Official Feedback Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
I've been passively reading this thread on and off for weeks. I have a lot of opinions, considering I've been on this website for five years, but haven't said anything out of fear of how I might be received. I expect this post to be removed or shadow edited like other people's messages since I will be critical.

I've moderated a Pokémon forum/Discord server that relies on the forum software Xenforo, like TBT, for six years. I won't mention what the forum I run is called since I don't wish to advertise it, but instead, I want to give my feedback as someone who has also helped lead small gaming online communities.

The lack of accountability towards staff on here is appalling. When a moderator on an online community makes creepy, out-of-place, and rule-breaking posts on a PG-13 forum, they need to be demoted at the very least and not allowed to "just be on hiatus." Regardless of the actual context around the post, mentioning adult topics in an SFW space should not be allowed, even by moderators, as it could lead to regular users thinking they can say and do the same thing.

I have also had numerous posts of mine taken down over the years, even though they didn't break any rules, or other users did the same thing and didn't get in trouble for it. This weird double standard made me feel like I was just disliked by some of the staff rather than having done anything wrong, and it made me feel like I was walking on eggshells while posting here for a long time. One time, I was accused of making an alternate account when I did no such thing, and when I told the moderators what happened, I was ignored. If a user on the site I help run believed they were unfairly warned, we would've, at the very least, responded to them. That warning is still on my profile to this day.

My last issue is the lack of effort to revive any activity on this website. When a forum is losing activity, as is typically the case with websites of this nature in the 2020s, it is usually smart to have moderators or other staff create new threads with interesting topics to keep user retention. These don't have to be long or meaty thread topics, but at the very least, they should be engaging. This site has relied on ancient threads for much of its activity for months, and posting on here is less interesting than it used to be since new threads on many boards are so rare. There are only so many times I want to post in the same "place your random thoughts" or "what is the last video game you've beaten" threads I have used since the turn of the decade. And now that a large portion of this website's userbase has left over poorly communicated drama that was swept under the rug, like my personal situation, new threads are less common.

This site meant a lot to me during the start of the pandemic, but I've increasingly distanced myself from it because it feels like a mostly abandoned project. Outside of the occasional events, not much was happening on here for a long time, even before the drama surfaced. The Discord server for this site has been a ghost town for ages, and now the website has had the same fate. It isn't entirely surprising since there hasn't been a new Animal Crossing game in a while, but this website's moderation issues and decline in new activity sadden me. This website can be somewhat revived, but it will require a tremendous effort, and I hope the overhaul to the site's rules that have been announced on this thread will be a step in the right direction.
 
The lack of accountability towards staff on here is appalling. When a moderator on an online community makes creepy, out-of-place, and rule-breaking posts on a PG-13 forum, they need to be demoted at the very least and not allowed to "just be on hiatus." Regardless of the actual context around the post, mentioning adult topics in an SFW space should not be allowed, even by moderators, as it could lead to regular users thinking they can say and do the same thing.
Neb, these are my thoughts exactly. It is appalling to me that it has taken more than two months to make any changes to the rules, and that there have seemingly been zero repercussions for the staff-member-who-should-not-be-named.

I am a member (and a moderator) of a different online community of 14,000 registered users, where recently, a high-ranking user (the second highest, in fact) was found to have made some disturbing comments about minors. Granted, they were worse than what our staff member here said, but of somewhat the same nature. Although this community I'm talking about is so much less active than the Bell Tree, with an owner who hasn't spoken a word to us since December, this user was banned in about twenty minutes after the comments were known about. I feel like taking an action towards this person on Bell Tree / their comments should take a MUCH HIGHER PRIORITY.

So it's been more than two months since there was some uproar in this thread about comments of a sexual nature that were made by a staff member. I am very surprised that there have still not been any updates to the rules that would prevent comments of this nature being made by anyone again. Now, maybe the survey results aren't what I would have figured them to be, but in my head, that kind of comment just really doesn't seem like the sort of comment that should be allowed on here.

I would really like to return to this server (the rest of it, I guess) but I am absolutely not comfortable until, at the bare minimum, the rules get updated.
I have made at least two comments in this nature, and they have gotten 25ish likes combined, at least.
This seems like an issue the community wants addressed, but it seems like it just isn't getting addressed, at all. What's the point of leaving feedback if it gets ignored?

If this was a corporate company, then fight your cheeks offs, but this is a forum of volunteers. They are doing their best. What else can you ask for?
Shawn, I do agree with your comment in a sense that we should not be insulting anybody here. Especially because one of the few times I posted here, I voiced my opinion that the "sexual content" question on the survey they did didn't grasp the situation well enough, compared to the severity of comments that have been made here. It was my opinion that this was "middle school humor" which is a term my family likes to use when people talk using potty humor. Somebody else decided to quote my post and ask if I would ask a group of middle schoolers "how long their dock is" which seemed like a really negative and non-constructive way of disagreeing with someone's personal opinion, and is honestly why I took a break from even opening this forum.
And yeah, if this forum is causing me so much anger to be on at this moment, it does make me want to just walk away from it. But I have loved it in the past and I want it to change for the good.
Also, being a volunteer as opposed to a hired employee does not excuse inappropriate and sexual comments.

Now that I've made a few points across, I am going to post them, close this forum. and not return for a while- I'm sick of being here, I can't believe that nothing has happened regarding the staff member's comments, and honestly, I am not a fan of some of the recent responses by staff about this troll account, which do seem to dismiss any serious effects the account may have imposed. Hopefully by the time I come back, things will have changed for the better.
 
honestly, it's impossible not to agree at this point, with you and @/Neb. while i do think there are some staff members who genuinely want to improve the forum and take the criticism onboard, it's becoming clear that their efforts and reputation are both being impeded by the site owner, who cannot even improve a simple behavior he was called out on near the start of this thread, so why should we have any faith about other issues being addressed, let alone more serious ones? i'm not even bothering to ask for an apology anymore regarding how i was spoken to, because it's clear at this point that it would be forced, insincere and disingenuous. the lack of accountability from jeremy in particular is appalling. he cannot respond appropriately, if at all, he continues to show blatant bias towards certain users, and is incapable of apologizing, evidently. "this probably goes without saying." no, it doesn't, when at least four people had to push you to acknowledging the situation at all.

this cannot be a truly safe space when the ultimate arbiter of authority proves to be unempathetic, callous and biased. it certainly isn't for me. i'm not sure if jeremy just doesn't realize the real life consequences of his behavior, or if he just doesn't care. neither are good. and it's such a shame because despite occasional ups and downs, i used to love this community, the events, the support from other users, but even if a new animal crossing game or something else managed to temporarily revive this forum, i would never be able to look past the fact that the site owner responded as though i deserved targeted homophobic and ableist harassment, then refused to acknowledge the situation until other users also pressed him.

that said, i did want to at least thank @/Ladydestani, who did take the time to clarify and apologize. i really appreciated it, and it made me feel a smidge better about the situation. since i questioned your actions publicly on here, it only feels right to acknowledge your apology publicly, too. if only certain others could follow your example, i suspect we might not be 56 pages deep into this.
 
Took me a while, but I finished reading this whole thread. At least what remains of it, as there have been some deletions. I also read these threads link1 and link2 to try to understand the situation better. I think I maybe need to read at least the Valentine's event thread that's being referenced at times too. Maybe even re-read the whole thread eventually, now I know how it ends (TBC?)

At some point I'll offer up my thoughts as a total outsider with no emotional involvement to anybody here, just as a chick who loves Animal Crossing so much she named her pet dogs after 2 of the villagers and came looking for a more retro community-based alternative to social media and found you guys. Within a day or so of signing up, I was directed to this thread, so thought it would be wise of me to try to understand what I've signed up for. So I hope it's cool for me to offer feedback too, I know there was a suggestion that new people shouldn't be able to, but I hope it's alright for me to? I'm trying to give the whole thing a lot of thought, I promise.

(I did the feedback survey too, but think I actually missed the boat on that)
 
Last edited:
Took me a while, but I finished reading this whole thread. At least what remains of it, as there have been some deletions. I also read these threads link1 and link2 to try to understand the situation better. I think I maybe need to read at least the Valentine's event thread that's being referenced at times too. Maybe even re-read the whole thread eventually, now I know how it ends (TBC?)

At some point I'll offer up my thoughts as a total outsider with no emotional involvement to anybody here, just as a chick who loves Animal Crossing so much she named her pet dogs after 2 of the villagers and came looking for a more retro community-based alternative to social media and found you guys. Within a day or so of signing up, I was directed to this thread, so thought it would be wise of me to try to understand what I've signed up for. So I hope it's cool for me to offer feedback too, I know there was a suggestion that new people shouldn't be able to, but I hope it's alright for me to? I'm trying to give the whole thing a lot of thought, I promise.

(I did the feedback survey too, but think I actually missed the boat on that)
I think you should offer your thoughts as a new member! I think it would be valuable. And if things didn't change from the last time I was poking around, the staff seemed to encourage anybody who wish to speak- to speak their thoughts in this thread.
There are certain issues I think newer members (myself included, I only became more active early 2024) would not understand to the full extent. I think the recent suggestion of TBT accounts older than 6 months posting in this thread was just to keep trolls away. (Although thinking about it now, I don't know how effective that would be. I feel like trolls have a lot of time and patience.)

I hope that The Bell Tree Forums will remain a good place to talk about Animal Crossing and whatnot. I think a lot of members are just fed up with the moderation team for ... I want to say... possibly a decade! That is just me speculating though.
There was/is a rule saying: Do not target, harass, publicly criticize, or make snide remarks towards staff members of The Bell Tree. As volunteers, staff members devote their free time to running the forum and should be allowed to do so without being targeted.
So it was kind of hard for members to speak against mods without the fear of getting a warning or a ban, I think.

Here's the link to the V-days thing!
 
I'm not new, but I'm a long time lurker LOL I actually wasn't aware of a lot of the goings on until I started reading this thread about a month ago. I did want to say that I was pretty saddened by a lot of the stuff going on, and the fact that it drove a lot of people away. I usually host a yearly art exchange in December, but with the way things are right now, I don't even know if there's enough people for me to host it with a lot of the regulars being out.

I feel like the forums have kind of died off, like several people mentioned, which is really sad to me because I enjoy coming here and have been coming here for a long time. I'm not personally involved in a lot of what happened, but I see how it affects both sides.

I think having moderators who actually care about the members would help a lot, as I've personally seen A LOT of stuff that has upset me on here that the staff have done nothing about. I'm trans and I feel very uncomfortable being open about that because of things I've seen posted here. And I did see mentions of taking homophobia and transphobia seriously, so I do hope that DOES come into play, because I don't want to feel uncomfortable on an animal crossing forum when I already feel uncomfortable in real life LOL I don't want to come here and be stressed out about everything going on irl and some people's hurtful opinions.

I'd also like to feel comfortable participating in events, as I've always been scared to join in with art stuff cause at times there seems to be favoritism, and I'd like for everyone to be able to participate and have fun without worrying about stuff like that. And maybe that's just me LOL It may just be my anxiety on that one.

so that's my biggest hope. Is that this forum can be fun and safe again, because I haven't felt like it was that in a while, which is WHY I lurk instead of engaging with anyone. I understand the staff are dealing with a lot, but I do hope they put in the work to make things enjoyable for everyone.
 
This comment reads as incredibly dismissive and poorly timed (considering exactly what just happened) to me. There’s other things I could say about it but someone else is inevitably going to do that within the next few hours. I don’t understand why people feel the need to come in here and post things like “please stop fighting here’s a meme” or “it’s not that deep lmfao.” This isn’t even the first time you’ve done it.

You are right. Thank you. I will leave the forum.. not out of frustration or disagreement, but because I am part of the problem. Maybe others will learn from my example and F off. I loved my time here. Bye folks.
 
You are right. Thank you. I will leave the forum.. not out of frustration or disagreement, but because I am part of the problem. Maybe others will learn from my example and F off. I loved my time here. Bye folks.

Hi Shawn,

I don't think you're a part of the problem, this thread is for everyone. People might not agree with you, but what I want to say is if you enjoy being on the forums, you shouldn't leave. Maybe take a break, we all need a break from time to time cx
 
Last edited:
Here are my thoughts. Just to remind you all, I have no emotional involvement with anybody. I am a total outsider, so feel free to consider me as such. If I get something wrong, remember that and definitely don’t take my words to heart.

I’m gonna try and divide what I think are the key points into sections, so the point doesn’t get lost. I don’t mind if you want me to clarify or elaborate further on any of these and how I’ve come to this way of thinking, so feel free to ask me.

I’ll start from

I don’t know much about the prior history, but from what I can tell this recent blow-up started over the fact Chris rejected an entry for a Valentine’s event. I agree with other members here that rejecting an entry as 'low effort' seemed unnecessarily harsh. The rules didn’t need to be as strict as they were in the event, in my opinion and I could understand sleepey was hurt at being publicly called out like that. It’s an Animal Crossing forum, it’s cute to do an entry on a 3DS, seeing as acnl was on there. Relax the rules for events a bit. Make it fun for people, not work.

Honestly though, I’m surprised these events don’t just allow low effort entries anyway (not that I believe sleepey’s was). Staff don’t have to award the ones they consider low effort with points or whatever happens, but some people do likely just want to have a silly bit of fun that won’t take up much of their time. Staff don’t have to be the fun police. Not everyone has amazing art skills and sometimes people are just more comfortable submitting joke entries to things. Just let them do that, I say. You don’t have to give them anything for it. But it would get more people involved and would be a laugh.

It seems though that Chris actually apologised to sleepey for this. So I hope that can be the end of that particular story.

I don’t really understand the currency/collectible references. So that’s more difficult to comment on beyond I can understand people not liking everything to be art based, since this isn’t an art site. Change things up a bit. Encourage a broader range of skills so it doesn’t become a system where only artists are rewarded, since Animal Crossing isn’t art-centred. There’s already a sub dedicated entirely to people showcasing their art, so maybe people who are less skilled in drawing feel less valued here? Someone asked if a dedicated fanfic space could be created and I’m actually surprised that doesn’t already exist in an Animal Crossing community. That would be an example of how this place could become more inclusive and less art-centric, seeing as so many raised this early on.

I’ll even make a little suggestion: an irl scavenger hunt where you have a list of Animal Crossing related items to find. You get outside, you notice your surroundings. Maybe a list like a green leaf, a fruit from the game, flowers, shrubs etc. You bring that back and post it on here and you get points awarded out of 10 based on the items with the most likeness to those items. Or something like finding a villager irl where you have to take a pic of an animal and tell us which villager it reminds you of. Again you get points for likeness, but maybe also creativity. So if someone just has a black cat at home and posts it as Kiki, they can still get points for likeness, but less so for creativity, since it was obviously easy. But it means everyone can participate. Things like pigeons (Brewster) are easy in most parts of the world. Neighbourhood cats are another easy option. Something that encourages everyone to take time out and not get too hung up on what people are saying on the internet (because getting upset frequently is bad for your health) and it might be a good thing for a community that is feeling fragile overall. There’s no pressure to prove anything beyond being able to spot things.

Just a suggestion, if you all hate it I am cool with that lol. I don’t doubt the events take time and effort on the staff’s behalf and this is not meant to be dismissive of that at all, just a suggestion as an alternative to a constant stream of art contests.

From what I have observed, some people don’t like the hug reaction for personal reasons. Some would rather certain people didn’t like their posts. Some people believe that posts with lots of likes means the member who made it is right about whatever they’re saying. Some people feel that when there are posts where they’re being talked to/about in a negative way, if the post gets likes, that people are against them. All of these things are understandable and are probably contributing to the bad feeling. Sometimes likes are quite obviously done to back up someone in an argument, leaving the other person feeling vulnerable. My suggestion? Get rid of reactions completely. Nobody feels uncomfortable. Or, if possible, make them private so only the individual member can see their likes and who has liked them. It would also, hopefully, curtail some of the dog piling culture I’m seeing quite frequently.

I don’t think anything further than the option to ignore works well on a forum like this one. Blocking is more for socials. I don’t think blocking staff or putting them on ignore should be allowed either. It would be hard for them to moderate if you did that, I think. People did also mention mini-modding and I'm inclined to agree with that.

First and foremost, I’d suggest you ask yourself this:

If you genuinely believe a member of staff is a bad person who preys on minors, why are you still here?

I’m also wondering why some of the same people who seem to be saying this place isn’t safe for minors take such a strong stance against suggestions that minors shouldn’t message adults and that not every adult is to be trusted?

An age gap of 21 and 29 is not problematic or even unusual where I’m from (England) or where I live now (Sweden). A 21 year old is not a child. The staff apologised for things said in the past, was placed on hiatus and demoted to a lower role. What more do people want to happen? Can it ever be alright?

If I may point something out, without this being misinterpreted as an attack, this staff member has a thread for members to post about their sexualities. Plenty of members have posted in there, including those saying now that the staff member is inappropriate. I assume you didn’t feel it was unsafe to post in there? I assume there is no age restriction on that thread?

People seemed to jump from accusations of grooming to commenting on the fact that Chris likes Harry Potter, as if those things are remotely comparable. I’m sorry, but Harry Potter is a globally popular franchise. @oath2order said it best here:
I think that when it comes to this part specifically, I don't think that's something the forum staff should decide. I don't think banning discussion of "problematic properties" is the way to go about it. The Harry Potter universe is not inherently problematic; the creator is the issue.

Let's say you believe Israel is committing genocide in Gaza. Do we no longer get to talk about Starbucks, or any other company here that still does business in Israel because that's problematic?

When Tomodachi Life 1 released, Nintendo got so much backlash that they apologized for failing to include same-sex relationships (https://www.cbsnews.com/news/ninten...ame-sex-controversy-over-tomodachi-life-game/). Let's assume for the sake of argument that Tomodachi Life 2 also excludes same-sex relationships. Do we ban discussion of Tomodachi Life 2 because that's homophobic? Do we ban the discussion of all the old Harvest Moon games for that same reason?

Do we ban the discussion of old TV shows, that are not inherently problematic, but have significant issues in one or two episodes? For example, Buffy the Vampire Slayer. You have the ties of that to Joss Whedon, who contributes to what is called "toxic workplace environments", but also significantly uses what some consider a slur for Romani people in that show.

If you don't support something, don't comment in the thread about it. I think it's that simple. If you don't enjoy a certain content, just ignore and don't post in the thread about it. I don't like anime. There's also a lot of problematic things in anime, both tropes at-large and with specific shows. I don't want to ban the discussion of it; I just ignore the thread.

Basically, what I'm getting at is that I don't believe support of an intellectual property is inherently supportive of any ideas the creator of the intellectual property may hold, problematic or not, and the forum should not ban discussion of intellectual property unless said property violates the rules in some other method.
You can choose to boycott something. You can’t insist others do. Given that Chris is trans anyway, from what I understand, I am surprised this even came up.

BetsySundrop raised an interesting point here too.
Rules should be the same for staff/ members imo. Go on an adventure and see how much on this type of topic has been posted everywhere in this forum by members. If there is to be a rule against it on the forum, great, fine, but it should be a clear rule for everyone to follow, staff and members alike. And you may not have seen some of the posts, but there are some interesting ones.
Search for certain terms and see if Chris’ behaviour is unusual on this forum. It isn’t. Does it really matter? Or do you want all of those people held to account?
Is it simply because this is a staff member you believe should be held to a higher standard, or is this because some of you were already angry with Chris over other stuff, like the Valentine’s event?

I agree with BetsySundrop personally, that suggestive humour isn’t really harmful in itself. Therefore I hope nobody is penalised for dumb stuff they said years ago.

And another thing. 13 year olds aren’t babies. They're teenagers. Do you remember being 13? They often enjoy silly suggestive humour. It’s in PG13 movies, definitely.

On another note, maybe I was a weird Wednesday Addams type 13 year old or something, but I would’ve definitely have found the candy van meme thing described very funny.
Am I just evil?
It doesn’t matter what I think anyway. The staff involved apologised and promised it wouldn’t happen again, so it won’t.

It did not warrant someone sending that nasty message anonymously either. You can't complain the van was inappropriate and then do things like that and I hope whoever it was has been dealt with too.

Personally, other than engaging in harassment, I’d prefer people to just relax and be themselves. Suggestive humour and banter not your thing? Ignore it and don’t engage. But let people talk how they would to their people, to people like them. Obviously if someone starts harassing you then that is not ok and you are well within your rights to report them to the appropriate authorities. On here, that would be staff.
However, some of you say you don’t trust the staff now. Which leads me to…

The staff didn’t handle things well by seemingly insisting on censorship of Chris’ name. I don’t think that’s right and (probably accidentally) made everyone a million times more suspicious. Staff do need to be more transparent, perhaps held to a higher standard than members in that regard.

I agree with Yoshi155 here:
This site feels so authoritarian. The fact that people are afraid of their posts being deleted or edited for criticizing a staff member is insane.
Staff should be willing to accept criticism, just as they expect everyone else to.

And I fully, completely, absolutely disagree with the rule that staff should not be criticised.

I understand Marmalaide said she’d prefer it if you criticised her/staff privately. But if members can be talked to/about critically in public, including by staff, why is there a special rule in place that means all criticism of staff must be hidden? How do you know members wouldn’t also prefer to be contacted privately? That’s a rule that must change. It makes the staff look bad and won’t restore any faith if it continues. It is authoritarian, as Yoshi states.

However, I actually think Jeremy sticking up for his friend Chris was decent, on a human level. That is how you should handle a situation that is getting out of control like that and one person is being singled out. It is also (or should be) the natural human response to seeing a friend being attacked. But extend the same courtesy to other members and step in for them when it’s happening to them, not just staff, even if you’re not sure what’s going on yet, or you know they’re in the wrong. Dismantle that whipping post you mentioned and don’t let them burn that witch over there, even if you don’t like what she’s saying. Calm things down, reassure people they’re being heard, but don’t let it escalate into mob justice. Offer another point of view. Maybe even a neutral one, like I’m noticing some members are doing when nobody else does. I already felt quite uncomfortable reading that sort of thing in the original thread I was directed to and another one that was mentioned, aside from this one, and the lack of staff around to defuse things. I was extremely uncomfortable towards the end of this thread. The members who did step in are the members I hope will be considered for staff. I won't name them though, unless I'm asked to.

Regarding moderation in general, threads can be confusing when posts are being deleted. Is that something staff would consider changing? People can often learn from the mistakes from others. Earlier in the thread Mick threatened to delete every reply mentioning an incident and that seems like the perfect way to exacerbate a situation. If that was how things were being run, then it is of no great shock to me that people are frustrated and feel silenced.

I also don’t think it’s a great look to ban someone for a week and then extend the ban without warning or discussion with the banned member. That being said, I’d be surprised if this was an experience unique to Seliph, just you don’t hear about it unless someone else raises it. If that person is less popular, either nobody will raise it or it would be easier for the staff to delete and conceal these requests.
If it’s genuinely against the rules to discuss bans, then you’ve all had a lot of leniency granted on that, that is for sure. But that sort of makes it look like people desire this to be moderated based on an individuals popularity, which isn’t a fair system. The right to appeal shouldn’t depend on the popularity of the member. Popularity doesn’t equate to righteousness either.

I agree with oath2order again
I do think that one problem with the seliph ban is that there is a large public outcry about the ban.

Everyone has said that it isn't a friend group trying to get seliph unbanned, which is fine, that's what y'all are saying and so I'll roll with that.

But y'all do get that if the ban is reversed there is absolutely going to be a public perception of "if a user is popular enough and enough people claim the ban is unjust, the staff will bend to the will of the people", right? Like, that may not actually be the case, but it still will have the appearance of it.
All this will do will make things seem very unbalanced and that the severity of moderation depends on how popular a member is or not.

Which leads me to the next section......

I know this won't be well-received by everybody and I'm sorry about that, BUT, Seliph was being rude. Repeatedly.

It wasn’t even just to staff, it was to other members. In 3 out of the 4 the threads I read, in fact. Overly aggressive and confrontational. If this was a regular occurrence spanning several years, I can understand the staff wanting to take break from that. Especially seeing as there seemed to be a full blown witch hunt taking place. Or whipping post as Jeremy put it.

I don’t think trying to rally some sort of mob justice is helpful either. It’s perhaps shining a light on what some of the problems with Seliph are that have lead to this ban. If every time Seliph takes issue with someone, half the userbase joins in, then that’s a problem and difficult to moderate. If being rude to people is not allowed on here, then why would you expect anything different from staff?

Forget someone’s personal and social views and how agreeable you personally find them. If someone’s up in your face getting aggressive and trying to single out people to be dog piled, then that’s a problem and it isn’t fair to expect everyone to be ok with it.
If 'being yourself' is being rude and aggressive, that is a problem, for yourself and everyone around you.
There's mentions of people being afraid to post or even like stuff, for fear of triggering a dog pile or being frozen out by other members. Surely people can understand this is not sustainable longterm?

oath2order once again poses the right question here:
So in regards to this ban, what I'm trying to understand is what people are trying to get out of it? What exactly needs to "be addressed"? I thought the reason was already provided.

The other question I have is that "is there anything staff could say that would make people accept the ban"?
What circumstances or conditions need to be met in order for you to accept the ban? If the ban will not be lifted, are you planning to leave? To stay and complain it is unfair for the duration of the year? What can anyone do that isn't going to be viewed as bending the rules for one member?

I agree with Epicgamer. That private Discord server sounds toxic.
I think it highlights that a portion of the community are tucked away in their private chats breeding toxicity and collaborating on the next inflammatory topic to get their pitchforks out about. Sheando's post was very civil and was the exact type of discussion we want to be able to have here, but now you're blaming them for being uncomfortable at hyperbolic death threats. Even if it was entirely obvious they were hyperbolic, is there really a point engaging these discussions in good faith when there is a discord of people ready to attempt to weaponize everything you write against you at a moments notice? I saw the screenshot too and I have no idea who that person even is, so how would Sheando know how to communicate with them? Or maybe you could not blame Sheando and instead the person issuing toxic comments could take accountability for their harmful words?
I feel like staff should probably focus on monitoring some of the dog piling that seems to be happening quite frequently in these threads, along with suggestions that this is the norm here. There’s mentions of this private Discord that quite a number of members belong to, where participants are telling each other to respond aggressively to someone they’re unhappy with, or that they feel needs a lecture from multiple people at once.

It’s exceptionally surprising to see this frequently happens without a single staff member considering stepping in to play devil’s advocate for the person being piled on. To mediate the situation by trying to understand the person being shouted down and what’s going on for them, even if they’re unpopular or staff personally disagree with what they’ve posted. You can calm the situation down so much better by defusing things this way, I think.

The 4 hour cooldown won’t work either, if there are these coordinated Discord attacks. It leaves the member being singled out feeling quite vulnerable if they receive a multitude of (often very similar) responses that they can’t defend themselves from for hours and no mod wants to step in as they seem too afraid of losing popularity.

I would suggest clamping down heavily on those in this private Discord who seem intent on causing blow-ups. Perhaps even suggest you can’t belong to both, if the Discord server as a whole is now just intent on destroying the place anyway?

On a side note, are there kids in that private server? Just curious.

On a related note…

I won’t bring up every single incident, but I do want to touch on some of the more recent ones.

When Sheando was threatened, multiple people tried to tell Sheando this wasn’t a big deal. That felt cruel.

It doesn’t matter the context. Would you have said the same about the message sent to Oblivia, for example? “Oh but in the wider context…” no of course not. So it’s not fair to do that to someone who was upset by your words. People piling on the distressed party was very uncomfortable to read. I actually think LadyDestani saying she understood it was not to be taken literally was as unfair as it would’ve been had someone said this to Oblivia.

That’s where there’s a problem with unfair and unbalanced standards. Given this is what happened, I am stunned some of the same people involved now demand a public apology from staff that a troll got in and made unpleasant remarks. Sounds like it was taken care of very quickly, whereas poor Sheando seemingly had no idea what was going on and has definitely not received a public apology.

In the case of GooseyGuos, can I ask, are people absolutely sure this is/was a troll? To me, he reads like a person struggling with the English language who can’t understand why he’s being bombarded with negativity and, frankly, name calling. Pointing out his broken English wasn’t very nice, sorry to say. Neither was calling him a troll, which I also read to be about his struggles to express himself. And it definitely wasn’t cool to say “trying to tell you what I wanted you to do in English was giving me a ****ing migraine”.
These things ARE being critical of his language. And criticising him for calling people “friends” IS criticising his language, so the fact you all were so quick to say that wasn’t happening was baffling to me.

Given my line of work and given that GooseyGuos gave us the info of the region he comes from, I would suggest you’ve got this one very wrong. To me, he sounds exactly like how the Balkan Romani Gypsies speak English, especially if it is their THIRD language.
Something you should understand, in Bulgaria Roma are disliked: 59% to 80% of non-Roma have negative feelings towards Roma. So yes, they are heavily discriminated against, even in their own country, as he said. So either this was some kinda mastermind troll (and I’d be interested to see the evidence of this - maybe things were deleted?) or you’ve made a really big mistake there.

He was, to me, quite obviously trying to spirit people into moving along, but was met with instant hostility and shooting down ideas from multiple people, without so much as a kind word in his direction. It was uncomfortable to read, just saying. I hope you’re right and it wasn’t a real person. If it was, some of you were out of order. I won’t name or single anyone out. I just hope you rethink, that’s all.

The other possibilty I considered was that this was a staff plant to test who would be right for the moderator team. That’s not an accusation, I don’t really believe it was. But IF it was, then I would think most of you failed miserably lol. But I am not seriously suggesting this was the case as I’m sure staff would’ve said by now if it was. Once again, I’m not sure staff stepping in to say “if you think someone is trolling” is helpful when it’s supposedly against the rules to call people out like that? I suppose other people took it as Jeremy was defending him, so what do I know?

The same people who’d piled on GooseyGuos seemed to then jump on those who did try to advocate for him. It was actually admirable that some members stepped in like that. It should have been staff really. Especially when the member who stepped in, shared a deeply personal experience and bore the brunt of the backlash, was being outright attacked. Very uncomfortable reading again.

In fairness, Jeremy HAS stepped in now over the increasing hostility being thrown at various members and he IS bearing the brunt of it. That actually made me gain confidence in the staff, because that is how you’d want someone in authority to act in a situation like this, trust me. Not join in throwing pitchforks or gently telling the mob that they understand why they’re hurling flaming torches at someone.

With Daringred_ I did not see the posts, though Xara described the situation here.
What happened wasn't just the typical troll account or bot joining just to post spam, it was an account that was created solely to target, mock, and demean daringred_ while also taking a little dig at -Lumi- with their "seasonal lesbian" user title.

Their username was deranged_lesbian, which was daringred_'s user title for the longest time. They quoted this post of hers and repeated this part of it



several times, mockingly, in large font, and then hit her with a condescending "calm down, luv" which is a name that bothered daring just a couple days ago when someone else called her that.
I’m sure that wasn’t pleasant and I'm sorry it happened. I’m not belittling your experience and you have every right to be upset. But if it makes you feel any better, it reads less like targeted homophobia and more like someone, probably a kid, being silly? If the name that was used was your username/title at one time, it was probably just that. Reposting snippets of your posts as Xara describes sounds more silly than malicious. Shake it off, if you can. Rise above it. Don't let it destroy you, it isn't worth it.
But, don’t hold people who weren’t involved accountable and don’t lash out in anger or call people names. You won’t feel any better after, you’ll just be angrier and more upset.

Can I tentatively point out that you didn’t publicly apologise to Sheando for words you said, nor are you being forced to? By the same token you can’t demand a public apology from people for things they were not even involved in. From the sounds of it, staff acted very fast to deal with it and the member that did it has been dealt with severely.

No action has been taken against you so far for what you said about Sheando in the Discord, or in this thread with the name-calling directed at others and what read like a dismissal of another person’s deeply personal and distressing experience. But both Seliph, who was rude to you, and the troll who targeted you, have been banned. So you must recognise there is no anti-Daringred_ bias from staff? I hope you don't genuinely feel that there is a conspiracy against you, as I doubt that is the case.

I promise I’m not trying to attack you, I’m just trying to help you see the bigger picture and perhaps understand how things might seem to others and how you might be making them feel.

FINAL THOUGHTS

Things are taking another nasty turn in here as well, just the last couple of pages. Even since I last posted to say I would be reading the whole thread. The aggression and confrontational behaviour is driving people away who have nothing to do with what you’re all angry about. Please everyone, just remember these are real human beings you are talking to or about, especially while calling them out by name.

It’s a shame, as I can tell this place means a lot to all of you. But all some of you are doing right now is burning it down.

I noticed some signatures etc say things advising people to leave TBT or announcing their own departure. Yet many of those same people are still reasonably active, so it makes me think you all do have hope that this place can be ok? You do want it to be ok, right?

Again, I am willing to elaborate on any of my points and you are free to ask me about other stuff. I took a lot of notes and I didn’t include everything as I knew this would already be long.

You can get mad and shout at me, I won’t take it personally. Why would I? Nobody here knows me or anything about me? So you can hit me with your best shot if it will make you feel better lol.
But I promise I’m just trying to comment as an outsider who was directed to this upon joining and what I am observing here.
 
i don't know if the above reply is even worth responding to regarding myself, because it's clear you're responding to things you have no context of or aren't willing to acknowledge the context of and, ironically, much like the site owner, are completely tactless in your estimation. "i'm not belittling the experience," just to immediately belittle and dismiss and downplay the experience and the real life impact it had on me tells me all i need to know about the type of person you are and whether or not i should waste my time trying to explain myself as the victim Multiple times in this thread.
 
Is anything being done to find out who the trolls are? Is there a way to implement a minimum account age in order to comment on this thread? Like, the account has to have been here a minimum of six months. I say this because locking the thread would be stupid in the sense it'd continue to make people feel like things are being swept under the rug. It's bad enough there's a four hour limit.

i know earlier i suggested in passing that maybe locking this thread for a bit would be best at the time, but is there any way a minimum account age to comment here could be implemented? (quoting you Tude cause i feel like maybe 6 months is the right move) i just find it incredibly strange that fresh accounts come in suddenly becoming heavily invested in what's been going on here or using new accounts to target members. i don't know if it's just me but it feels pretty obvious what's been going on here unfortunately. i don't know what the limitations xenforo would have on implementing something like this, but maybe for the time being this could be a solution
 
This is a just a small comment on the request for new moderators. It's quite vague.

Screenshot 2025-08-08 11.35.41 AM.png


I do think there should be more information on what exactly the role consists of, responsibilities, etc. Maybe a page could be created or something? I feel like this should be detailed prior to sending a request. The job and expectations are described first and then you procure those interested.

I have absolutely no interest in being a moderator here, however, I wouldn't even be comfortable taking a volunteer job without specifics.
 
You are right. Thank you. I will leave the forum.. not out of frustration or disagreement, but because I am part of the problem. Maybe others will learn from my example and F off. I loved my time here. Bye folks.
I’m not sure if this was supposed to sound so passive aggressive, but if it was, can you like, not do that? I’m just saying that your post, intentionally or not, sounded like you didn’t read anything that happened or just don’t care. It was incredibly rude to basically come in here and say “go touch grass, it’s just an Animal Crossing forum and the volunteers don’t deserve to be criticized.” And yes, this thread is for everyone, so even though I don’t think what you said offered anything productive, you’re still allowed to say that. Just expect people to criticize you because your post came off as dismissive.

@Bo Selecta I also have some things to say about your post. But first I do think it’s impressive that you were able to read through this entire thread and write all of this even if I (spoiler alert) don’t agree with a lot of it.

It seems though that Chris actually apologised to sleepey for this. So I hope that can be the end of that particular story.
Well I mean… yeah, but it says a lot how long it took for that to happen or the situation to even be acknowledged in any way.

I don’t think anything further than the option to ignore works well on a forum like this one. Blocking is more for socials. I don’t think blocking staff or putting them on ignore should be allowed either. It would be hard for them to moderate if you did that, I think. People did also mention mini-modding and I'm inclined to agree with that.
See, the thing is when you have users who say racist/sexist/homophobic/transphobic etc things but it takes the staff months to delete their posts, you kind of need some way to make sure certain people can’t interact with you. I really don’t get the mental gymnastics people were going through to justify not having an actual block feature.

If you genuinely believe a member of staff is a bad person who preys on minors, why are you still here?
Notice how most of the people who were vocal about this are gone? Notice how the site has like, 30 active users now and almost none of them are the people who were in support of punishing Chris?

An age gap of 21 and 29 is not problematic or even unusual where I’m from (England) or where I live now (Sweden). A 21 year old is not a child. The staff apologised for things said in the past, was placed on hiatus and demoted to a lower role. What more do people want to happen? Can it ever be alright?
They should be completely demoted. Like Lumi said earlier, placing a staff member who poorly handled an event related situation in the position to hold events is nothing short of insulting to the people who were upset about this in the first place. I didn’t think Chris should be removed from the staff at first, but over time I started to agree that he should.

I’m also wondering why some of the same people who seem to be saying this place isn’t safe for minors take such a strong stance against suggestions that minors shouldn’t message adults and that not every adult is to be trusted?
The only people I saw saying that adults shouldn’t message minors are Goosey (and yes, he was a troll) and Aerith, neither of which were actively opposing Chris’ behavior.

Search for certain terms and see if Chris’ behaviour is unusual on this forum. It isn’t. Does it really matter? Or do you want all of those people held to account?
Yes. It matters. You can at least ignore members if they say uncomfortable things. You can’t do the same for staff, so it should be a given to expect better from them.

It doesn’t matter what I think anyway. The staff involved apologised and promised it wouldn’t happen again, so it won’t.
But why did it take until someone brought it up five years later before anyone on the staff took accountability? What that gives off is “oh no, people are going to hate us even more if we don’t respond now. We have to respond.” Do you realize how selfish that sounds? Like the only reason they apologized is because they didn’t want people to hate them, not because they’re actually sorry? That might not be true, but that’s definitely what it comes off like.

It did not warrant someone sending that nasty message anonymously either. You can't complain the van was inappropriate and then do things like that and I hope whoever it was has been dealt with too.
I think there’s good reason to believe that like Xara said here, the person that did that isn’t a current member of this community (a banned member who isn’t seliph) in an attempt to stir up drama. No one who truly cares about the future of the site would have done that.

All this will do will make things seem very unbalanced and that the severity of moderation depends on how popular a member is or not.
As LambdaDelta said:

and the appearance right now is of catering to a small group of people that simply desired seliph to be gone because they didn't like the percieved tone of his posts, instead of enforcing their rules fairly across the board. what of it?

legit don't bring up "appearances" when they already ****ed that over for themselves

I know this won't be well-received by everybody and I'm sorry about that, BUT, Seliph was being rude. Repeatedly.
Honestly, at this point I don’t think it matters whether or not you believe seliph was being rude, I think what most people should be able to agree on is that a year long ban for that when people have done much worse things and are still here is overkill. I’ve seen the ban message, but even if he was being rude, nothing could make me think a year long ban for not being nice (and even then, I can understand why he didn’t feel like being nice to staff) is even remotely fair. And it’s definitely unacceptable to ban someone for a week before suddenly extending it to a year with no prior notice.

I don’t think trying to rally some sort of mob justice is helpful either. It’s perhaps shining a light on what some of the problems with Seliph are that have lead to this ban. If every time Seliph takes issue with someone, half the userbase joins in, then that’s a problem and difficult to moderate. If being rude to people is not allowed on here, then why would you expect anything different from staff?
I… don’t see how that’s seliph’s fault. If someone says something subtly racist, I tell them they’re being racist, and a lot of people agree with me, is that my fault? That’s basically what a lot of seliph’s interactions are like. I don’t see how he can be blamed for saying something that a lot of people happen to agree with.

What circumstances or conditions need to be met in order for you to accept the ban? If the ban will not be lifted, are you planning to leave? To stay and complain it is unfair for the duration of the year? What can anyone do that isn't going to be viewed as bending the rules for one member?
Well as is, the ban already looks unfair, so just ending it right here would be much better. Other than that, there’s no justification staff can give me that I’d accept. Again, even if I did think he was being rude, being banned for a year for that is beyond stupid. Consider the fact that daringred was involved the interaction that caused the initial ban and even she thought it was too much. That says a lot. Oh, and yes, people have already left because the ban wasn’t lifted.

I feel like staff should probably focus on monitoring some of the dog piling that seems to be happening quite frequently in these threads, along with suggestions that this is the norm here. There’s mentions of this private Discord that quite a number of members belong to, where participants are telling each other to respond aggressively to someone they’re unhappy with, or that they feel needs a lecture from multiple people at once.
I’ve never really understood the dog piling complaint. When Betsy said that age gaps weren’t bad, people started explaining to her why they are. And a lot of people agreed with them. How is that dog piling? She should be prepared to handle criticism if she makes a controversial claim. And I’m not apart of that Discord server, but based on what I’ve heard, it doesn’t sound that toxic.

It doesn’t matter the context. Would you have said the same about the message sent to Oblivia, for example? “Oh but in the wider context…” no of course not. So it’s not fair to do that to someone who was upset by your words. People piling on the distressed party was very uncomfortable to read. I actually think LadyDestani saying she understood it was not to be taken literally was as unfair as it would’ve been had someone said this to Oblivia.

That’s where there’s a problem with unfair and unbalanced standards. Given this is what happened, I am stunned some of the same people involved now demand a public apology from staff that a troll got in and made unpleasant remarks. Sounds like it was taken care of very quickly, whereas poor Sheando seemingly had no idea what was going on and has definitely not received a public apology.
According to Lancelot, what daringred said clearly had no violent undertones. But someone saw it and decided they should share it with Sheando anyway, when they would gain nothing from it other than starting drama. If they didn’t do that, there would have been no issue. I don’t think daringred ever had any plans to make Sheando feel unsafe. I think what’s more important is how the person who was trying to start something in the first place hasn’t apologized, because again, I don’t think there were any implications behind that post. I’m not saying private servers can’t be toxic, but none of this is an example of that.

In the case of GooseyGuos, can I ask, are people absolutely sure this is/was a troll? To me, he reads like a person struggling with the English language who can’t understand why he’s being bombarded with negativity and, frankly, name calling. Pointing out his broken English wasn’t very nice, sorry to say. Neither was calling him a troll, which I also read to be about his struggles to express himself. And it definitely wasn’t cool to say “trying to tell you what I wanted you to do in English was giving me a ****ing migraine”.
These things ARE being critical of his language. And criticising him for calling people “friends” IS criticising his language, so the fact you all were so quick to say that wasn’t happening was baffling to me.
Yes, he was a troll. Even if we don’t look at the fact that his account was banned, which at this post I doubt staff would do without good enough reason, I find it extremely hard to believe that he has such difficulty understanding English and yet praised every single word that came out of Gabby’s mouth while also only reacting to certain posts as well. Sounds like someone who’s just pretending to not know English so that he can use that to start drama (also, the other trolls who were banned reacted to a lot of the posts he reacted to). In addition to that, in the DM I sent him, when I asked him if he wanted me to explain this in German, he said no because he only speaks German with people in real life. It’s almost like he doesn’t know German in the first place. And also, why would a new user even bother to post in this thread in the first place? Let alone one that has no idea what’s going on and can’t speak English.

I know it was me that said that migraine part, but I wouldn’t have been so annoyed at him if he didn’t PUBLICLY DISCLOSE that I started a DM with him. It was just the way he did it that showed he had absolutely no regard for my privacy when I told him multiple times to not post this publicly (and he also made me sound like the most platonic version of a yandere possible), so I didn’t really feel like being nice to him, especially since I just woke up and wanted to see if he responded to my DM only to see this bull**** on my screen. Is it possible that it’s just because he didn’t understand English? I suppose, but I doubt it. And there were people who assumed he was a troll besides the ones who posted about it in this thread.

Given my line of work and given that GooseyGuos gave us the info of the region he comes from, I would suggest you’ve got this one very wrong. To me, he sounds exactly like how the Balkan Romani Gypsies speak English, especially if it is their THIRD language.
Something you should understand, in Bulgaria Roma are disliked: 59% to 80% of non-Roma have negative feelings towards Roma. So yes, they are heavily discriminated against, even in their own country, as he said. So either this was some kinda mastermind troll (and I’d be interested to see the evidence of this - maybe things were deleted?) or you’ve made a really big mistake there.
I really think he was just making this up in an attempt to garner sympathy.

He was, to me, quite obviously trying to spirit people into moving along, but was met with instant hostility and shooting down ideas from multiple people, without so much as a kind word in his direction. It was uncomfortable to read, just saying. I hope you’re right and it wasn’t a real person. If it was, some of you were out of order. I won’t name or single anyone out. I just hope you rethink, that’s all.
I don’t see how it was hostile. The first posts were me and Blue explaining to him why his idea wouldn’t work out. Then he insisted that we were wrong when we know more about the site than he does. Maybe the comment from Tude was kinda out of pocket, but then he started performing mental Olympics to convince himself that people were being rude to him because he didn’t speak English. If anything, he was being rude when he said he wouldn’t waste his time translating our posts. Posts that were just trying to explain the situation to him, but he just assumed that people didn’t like him because he didn’t speak English. I don’t know, it was just really frustrating to watch.

The same people who’d piled on GooseyGuos seemed to then jump on those who did try to advocate for him. It was actually admirable that some members stepped in like that. It should have been staff really. Especially when the member who stepped in, shared a deeply personal experience and bore the brunt of the backlash, was being outright attacked. Very uncomfortable reading again.
When Gabby responded to defend Goosey, these were the only posts directly replying to her. I believe Aerith also only got one response. I apologize in advance for saying that I don’t see how anyone was being attacked here.

In fairness, Jeremy HAS stepped in now over the increasing hostility being thrown at various members and he IS bearing the brunt of it. That actually made me gain confidence in the staff, because that is how you’d want someone in authority to act in a situation like this, trust me. Not join in throwing pitchforks or gently telling the mob that they understand why they’re hurling flaming torches at someone.
Jeremy is bearing the brunt of the backlash because quite frankly, he deserves it. He could step in to defend someone who was trying to stir up drama and supposedly being piled on, but when another user was actively being trolled (honestly, I think cyberbullying is probably a fitting word), he couldn’t even be bothered to acknowledge anything about it until people said he should.

I’m sure that wasn’t pleasant and I'm sorry it happened. I’m not belittling your experience and you have every right to be upset. But if it makes you feel any better, it reads less like targeted homophobia and more like someone, probably a kid, being silly? If the name that was used was your username/title at one time, it was probably just that. Reposting snippets of your posts as Xara describes sounds more silly than malicious. Shake it off, if you can. Rise above it. Don't let it destroy you, it isn't worth it.
But, don’t hold people who weren’t involved accountable and don’t lash out in anger or call people names. You won’t feel any better after, you’ll just be angrier and more upset.
I guess you’re kind of right that the troll was just being immature, but I think daringred deserves to upset about the fact that an entire account was made just to harass her. And she definitely deserves to be upset that staff didn’t say anything about it.

Can I tentatively point out that you didn’t publicly apologise to Sheando for words you said, nor are you being forced to? By the same token you can’t demand a public apology from people for things they were not even involved in. From the sounds of it, staff acted very fast to deal with it and the member that did it has been dealt with severely.
The difference is as I explained above. daringred had no intent to attack Sheando, but the troll account was made specifically to attack her (and Lumi, since another one was made later targeting her). The only reason daringred had to apologize to Sheando was because again, someone decided it would be a good idea to share a message with her to start drama. Here though, Jeremy again, said nothing about the trolling incident until Saylor, Lumi, daringred, and Xara posted saying that he should apologize for it. It would be different in she said something genuinely hostile against Sheando and someone showed it to her, but that wasn’t the case, and so I think daringred does deserve a public apology and should be allowed to demand one.

Finally, I still disagree with the claim that people were being overly aggressive in this thread. Even if you don’t put yourself in their shoes and understand why they were mad, I genuinely can’t see what people even potentially saw as rude in 70% of the posts. Maaaaaybeeee Crash because she capitalized a lot of words? But she’s already deleted everything she’s ever posted on this site. If people could actually point to what they read as rude, I think it would help a lot since it doesn’t seem like we can agree on what that word means.
 
I agree with digi so I'm not going to bother responding to this whole post even though there's a lot I could say, but in regards to the daringred situation since it's still fresh--

I’m sure that wasn’t pleasant and I'm sorry it happened. I’m not belittling your experience and you have every right to be upset. But if it makes you feel any better, it reads less like targeted homophobia and more like someone, probably a kid, being silly? If the name that was used was your username/title at one time, it was probably just that. Reposting snippets of your posts as Xara describes sounds more silly than malicious. Shake it off, if you can. Rise above it. Don't let it destroy you, it isn't worth it.
But, don’t hold people who weren’t involved accountable and don’t lash out in anger or call people names. You won’t feel any better after, you’ll just be angrier and more upset.

Can I tentatively point out that you didn’t publicly apologise to Sheando for words you said, nor are you being forced to? By the same token you can’t demand a public apology from people for things they were not even involved in. From the sounds of it, staff acted very fast to deal with it and the member that did it has been dealt with severely.

No action has been taken against you so far for what you said about Sheando in the Discord, or in this thread with the name-calling directed at others and what read like a dismissal of another person’s deeply personal and distressing experience. But both Seliph, who was rude to you, and the troll who targeted you, have been banned. So you must recognise there is no anti-Daringred_ bias from staff? I hope you don't genuinely feel that there is a conspiracy against you, as I doubt that is the case.

I promise I’m not trying to attack you, I’m just trying to help you see the bigger picture and perhaps understand how things might seem to others and how you might be making them feel.
[/SPOILER]
With all due respect, no, it was targeted homophobia. You said you're not belitting her experience but then you go on to do exactly that. I just don't understand why you tell her to "shake it off" but right above this you go to great lengths to defend a different user because you believe they were targeted for having broken English. I absolutely don't think that would be okay to be clear, but why is only that worth defending and not homophobia? It's not just your post that's been bothering me about this situation so I apologize for using it as a springboard. A user a few pages back said they jump in when they see someone being dog-piled and clearly others agreed with that sentiment because quite a few people came to the defense of Goose but none of them were present when daringred was being publicly attacked. I hope you can understand why that would be upsetting.



I think a minimum account age requirement for posting in this thread is a good idea, even if it's something quite small like only a month. I absolutely think new members can provide feedback just as worthy as anyone else's, but with there being an influx of trolls and alt-accounts targeting this thread I think trying to minimize that is worth making a few genuine new accounts wait a bit before posting their feedback publicly in here if they have it.
 
This is a just a small comment on the request for new moderators. It's quite vague.

View attachment 624403

I do think there should be more information on what exactly the role consists of, responsibilities, etc. Maybe a page could be created or something? I feel like this should be detailed prior to sending a request. The job and expectations are described first and then you procure those interested.

I have absolutely no interest in being a moderator here, however, I wouldn't even be comfortable taking a volunteer job without specifics.
I was honestly trying to understand and research what a fourm mod's tasks would be, and I am still unsure.

I also believe that the request for new mods should be mentioned on the TBT discord group, since so many have left to discord, maybe it might pike some interest from there?
 
i know earlier i suggested in passing that maybe locking this thread for a bit would be best at the time, but is there any way a minimum account age to comment here could be implemented? (quoting you Tude cause i feel like maybe 6 months is the right move) i just find it incredibly strange that fresh accounts come in suddenly becoming heavily invested in what's been going on here or using new accounts to target members. i don't know if it's just me but it feels pretty obvious what's been going on here unfortunately. i don't know what the limitations xenforo would have on implementing something like this, but maybe for the time being this could be a solution
I agree it does seem weird that a lot of new members are weighing in on the feedback and seem really invested in something that they just found out about. If I was new this would be the last place I would be at. I might check into it, but I wouldn't extensively be reading several threads. And with quite a lot of knowledge on the matters. They could be a really new compassionate member, but it kinda reads like they could also be an alt account. Especially with their introduction post...



While kind of trivial compared to what is happening I agree with some points they made with some of the topics. But a lot of what they wrote now that I had the time to read through it all is very dismissive. And it wasn't little minor instances some of the things that happened were very rude and harmful.
Like now that I really think about it, reactions are something I really haven't come across on any other forum and the suggestions in the V-day snippet sounded like they could've been fun ideas to implement before everything that happened. Since I always did feel like a lot of the events were heavily art tasked.

And how weird moderation can be and not balanced? I think it was Neb that brought it up earlier and I have two instances of this to. One time I used an abbreviated curse word which gave me a warning. I get it, it's bypassing the filters so of course it seems warranted and depending on the context justifiably so. If it was hostile or directed at someone of course. But it was a member who commented and was deeply disturbed by fake friends that used them. I've been there and while I can't say our experiences relate 100% I still felt where they were coming from. So I reached out to them with a post saying how their feelings were valid and that how it's better to have such toxic ___ out of our life even if it hurts.

So I get a warning for that and yeah that's fine I deserve it. I bypassed a filter even if it was a heartfelt message. But then through the years and even soon after I've seen others with curses in their posts stay unedited without a warning. Or talking about drugs or alcohol usage in vivid detail or someone commenting how they wanted to be friends with minors and the only way they could be was by providing them alcohol and I'm like? Why was my harmless post edited and this stuff isn't???

And that's not even touching on how a lot of what happened recently hasn't been addressed to that great of a detail. It felt kinda lowkey swept under the rug. I feel many are way better at expressing their words than I am because I'm just bad at that, but I agree with how harmful and rude it was and while yes the accounts were taken care of there should've been some larger public announcement about it. Guos got one and they were very stubborn and seemingly a possible troll account?

This is a just a small comment on the request for new moderators. It's quite vague.

View attachment 624403

I do think there should be more information on what exactly the role consists of, responsibilities, etc. Maybe a page could be created or something? I feel like this should be detailed prior to sending a request. The job and expectations are described first and then you procure those interested.

I have absolutely no interest in being a moderator here, however, I wouldn't even be comfortable taking a volunteer job without specifics.
It seems strange that this is just on a tiny header and not a full on announcement. I feel like this is a situation that should've been addressed in a thread. Maybe not here? Maybe its own thread about how the forum is looking for new moderators? I've been a moderator on a few forums and even an admin. All of those were kind of forced on me when the original owners just didn't want to deal with the place anymore and almost shot the keys at me.

If the forum needs new moderators and it seemingly does. I feel it needs an official announcement? Because there's a lot of staff that haven't been on in years (way before any of this started) and others took an unofficial leave of absence. Did they leave? Are they on break? Is this a hiatus because the state of the forum is too much for them to handle currently whether because of life or the current issues of the forum?
 
Here are my thoughts. Just to remind you all, I have no emotional involvement with anybody. I am a total outsider, so feel free to consider me as such. If I get something wrong, remember that and definitely don’t take my words to heart.

I’m gonna try and divide what I think are the key points into sections, so the point doesn’t get lost. I don’t mind if you want me to clarify or elaborate further on any of these and how I’ve come to this way of thinking, so feel free to ask me.

You can get mad and shout at me, I won’t take it personally. Why would I? Nobody here knows me or anything about me? So you can hit me with your best shot if it will make you feel better lol.
But I promise I’m just trying to comment as an outsider who was directed to this upon joining and what I am observing here.

There's a lot I could say in response to this entire post, as someone who's been active in the earlier parts of the conversation (and who has periodically / occasionally checked in to see if any progress or resolution has been made since I bowed out.) (Congratulations on being what / who made me willing to log in to comment again, at least.) Especially as the person who had made the Harry Potter point, as it has been misconstrued once again.

But Yoshi has covered it, Saylor has covered it, Blue has covered it... and I'm not willing to offer a genuine, heartfelt post to someone whose feedback I can't say I fully trust as genuine, so all I'll say is one thing Blue did also spot & comment on. Two things, actually.

First and foremost, while reading everything in full is a commendable act & is more than many who have chimed in over the past few months have been willing to do, much has been misconstrued, misread, misinterpreted, and dismissed in the process of your reading. Saylor highlighted this one as a perfect example - why was Goosey (who multiple people have said was not being criticised for his English usage despite your asserting this as the issue people had with him) given full benefit of the doubt and sympathy, while the account made to target daringred was dismissed with a "shake it off, this isn't actually targeted"?

Secondly: it really is hard to believe a brand new user would take this much interest in this thread - enough to read it and multiple threads related to it in full, especially as it was honed in on. And repeatedly brought up by you over the course of learning about & reading it. And especially considering (as Blue had noted), your introduction post:
"All my sheep are so silly and sheep-like that I can tell them anything and they will believe it. All the wolves are sneaky, but I am much sneakier than they.

I like to play the sheep and wolves off against each other, for my own amusement. It gets boring living around sheep and I don’t trust the wolves, so why not?"

Suggests very specific intent. It's not exactly subtle wording or theming, and does come across as very odd.


As for the thread itself, it's a shame that, what... three months? have passed and there's still a struggle to receive proper communication and proper address regarding so much of what's been discussed here from staff. I keep coming back to check on how things are going and chime in because - and I've said it before - I do sincerely want to see this site improve as it does have a place in my heart, but it's disappointing seeing how proper address of everything is still not being provided. And disappointing seeing Jeremy continue to act dismissively. I'm sure he's dealing with a lot considering the troll situations, and I'm sure it's crushing to see a project you've poured so much of your life into collapse the way TBT has been, but a lot of why this is happening is becasue of how this site is being handled and unfortunately there's no way around stepping up and trying to address that properly, lest things continue to slip. That includes communicating openly & fully, whether it's about the trolling & harassment, about the plans for new moderators, about anything.



EDIT:
maybe i'm too much of a skeptic but the warning sirens going off in my head are very loud. completely dismissing what happened to daring and lumi, telling them it is something that should just be shaken off and taken lightly....? while simultaneously being in favour of trying to give Goosey (who is now banned because i'm assuming they were a troll/alt account) benefit of the doubt is incredibly weird. it's giving very 'i can excuse homophobia but i draw the line at potentially being mean to 2nd/3rd language learner' when it's been said time and time again no one here criticized Goosey for that.
No, I don't think you're being too much of a skeptic. I agree entirely, the warning sirens are very loud & have been since that introduction post. Honestly, I think that - with everything occurring re: trolling and user harassment lately - everyone should be approaching sudden user interest in this thread (especially from brand new users) with a bit of skepticism.
 
Last edited:
This is a just a small comment on the request for new moderators. It's quite vague.

View attachment 624403

I do think there should be more information on what exactly the role consists of, responsibilities, etc. Maybe a page could be created or something? I feel like this should be detailed prior to sending a request. The job and expectations are described first and then you procure those interested.

I have absolutely no interest in being a moderator here, however, I wouldn't even be comfortable taking a volunteer job without specifics.
I was honestly trying to understand and research what a fourm mod's tasks would be, and I am still unsure.

I also believe that the request for new mods should be mentioned on the TBT discord group, since so many have left to discord, maybe it might pike some interest from there?
It seems strange that this is just on a tiny header and not a full on announcement. I feel like this is a situation that should've been addressed in a thread. Maybe not here? Maybe its own thread about how the forum is looking for new moderators? I've been a moderator on a few forums and even an admin. All of those were kind of forced on me when the original owners just didn't want to deal with the place anymore and almost shot the keys at me.

If the forum needs new moderators and it seemingly does. I feel it needs an official announcement? Because there's a lot of staff that haven't been on in years (way before any of this started) and others took an unofficial leave of absence. Did they leave? Are they on break? Is this a hiatus because the state of the forum is too much for them to handle currently whether because of life or the current issues of the forum?

these are threads relating to past staff applications that i was able to dig up (2013/2014/2015) they're older and i can't speak to what is being looked for during this round of applications but i found the 2014 posting to be a good start to seeing what the roles/requirements/responsibilities would be. i couldn't find a earlier post about the 2015 applications and it was just more of a reminder that it was going to end.

I agree it does seem weird that a lot of new members are weighing in on the feedback and seem really invested in something that they just found out about. If I was new this would be the last place I would be at. I might check into it, but I wouldn't extensively be reading several threads. And with quite a lot of knowledge on the matters. They could be a really new compassionate member, but it kinda reads like they could also be an alt account. Especially with their introduction post...

maybe i'm too much of a skeptic but the warning sirens going off in my head are very loud. completely dismissing what happened to daring and lumi, telling them it is something that should just be shaken off and taken lightly....? while simultaneously being in favour of trying to give Goosey (who is now banned because i'm assuming they were a troll/alt account) benefit of the doubt is incredibly weird. it's giving very 'i can excuse homophobia but i draw the line at potentially being mean to 2nd/3rd language learner' when it's been said time and time again no one here criticized Goosey for that.
 
Just wanted to make a few points while I'm on my lunch break -

1. I agree with some points of Bo and appreciate a fresh perspective (if it's genuine, that intro post is a little uhh, on the nose), but disagree with others. Yeah, no one should take what a troll says to heart, and they were blatantly targeting her with something they knew would hurt, but let's not pretend they would have called her a deranged heterosexual if she was straight. Calling it silly feels very dismissive.

2. I'm glad someone else thinks that Goosey's speech pattern was believable. I still don't feel entirely comfortable with the idea that he might be perma-banned for not communicating well enough; it seems like too much effort for a troll to be that consistent in speech patterns. But I also don't know what goes on behind the scenes, and for all I know his IP address could be linked to the other trolls. 🤷‍♀️

3. So that I don't have to bring out my clown makeup, I don't want to prematurely vouch for Bo, but I will say that Yoshi was the one to direct them here in an unrelated thread.

4. It would be easier on the staff and the members applying if they knew what was expected of them as a mod. If you anticipated 30+ responses, I could understand using a simple question to narrow down who would be given a more in-depth application, but if people don't know what they're signing up for, they might drop out at the point where you tell them.

edit: now that I think on it, wasn't there a troll banned that also had a fairy tale theme in username? this feels fishy
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top