Apologies for the additional response, and although I feel my previous words are adequate, it doesn’t feel great to not have the opportunity to defend myself a final time. I will make this my last post on the topic, and I accept any warning I might get about it, but I hope my post will be kept up. Also apologies for posting when it seems like there's a troll infestation, but I want to get this out so the issue can be laid to rest.
---
i'd prefer to defend myself against thinly veiled groomer accusations and slander, thank you.
In the time between I last posted, instead of reconsidering what I said, giving me the benefit of the doubt, or even just waiting for further clarification, you have put words in my mouth multiple times. I don't appreciate that, and it hurts my feelings.
Being friends generally implies a degree of charitableness. Before this discussion, I also thought of you fondly. Despite me taking precautions to ensure I don’t upset you, and stating my intentions, it still happened. I’ve offered proof twice on statements you were wrong about (that I’m unable to speak to you directly and that I think you’re a groomer), but you have acknowledged neither, and remain angry towards me.
We cannot have a productive discussion if you are actively choosing to ignore my words:
You’re totally right that not all adult-minor interactions are bad and some can even be healing.
I’m not insinuating you’ve said something inappropriate,
It's great that you had a positive experience with adults as a minor and I'm happy that you can pass that onto others who need it. I don't want people to assume the bad in everyone, and I am grateful for your efforts.
I guess, I’m less responding directly to you, and more addressing any minors that happen to be reading.
As I said in my post: I wasn't insinuating you were saying something bad.
I did not call you a groomer nor did I imply that about you. I’m going to explain my thought process, but I won’t be directly quoting here; I will be paraphrasing and summarizing -
Before my initial post, I observed Goose being overly protective in the style of a ‘the internet is new and I have no idea what’s going on but I don’t want my kids to get hurt’ parent. Then I observed you saying, “No, actually, adult-minor friendships can be a positive force for neglected minors.” And I thought, this conversation needs way more nuance than just these two positions. It doesn’t make either of you wrong or bad for what you said. I was not scolding either of you for not bringing up what I brought up.
I knew you would get upset with people not directly speaking to you in the past, so I did what I thought you would want - I quoted you when I chose to discuss the same subject matter. Then, mid-train of thought, I corrected myself with, "I guess this doesn't really involve you, it's just what you said prompted me to think about it and say it, in case any minors here were like me and hadn't thought about it."
As someone who was abused as a minor, I wanted to add to the discussion because I’d rather feel like I voiced something that might help keep someone safe, than know that I absolutely didn’t help anyone by remaining silent. I quoted you because you were the person who spoke last and mentioned vulnerable minors in the first place. I didn’t quote you to pick a fight or to randomly insult you. I certainly didn't expect it to be controversial or cause an argument.
As a minor, I never imagined an adult I considered my friend would ever betray me, and it was difficult for me to see the manipulation because it was a slow and deliberate process. It was out of the scope of my imagination because they had been so kind to me. I feel no guilt or shame in reminding minors to be careful, especially when statistically, the most common predator is an adult the victim trusts.
I’m going to break down what I said further, because I’m not sure how else to get my point across:
I understand feeling upset over the assumption that people might think you're a groomer,
Might is the key word here. I didn’t say, “people think daringred_ is a groomer” and I didn’t say “I think you’re a groomer”. I said this because I assumed that, in a hypothetical scenario where someone would be skeptical of your bond, it would obviously hurt your feelings, and I was acknowledging that your feelings mattered.
but in my personal opinion, it's better that people be cautious when it comes to minor-adult interactions, than just assume it's wholesome.
I don’t know why this is a hot take. I really don’t. The collective safety of minors is more important than an individual’s feelings. I’d rather have someone be skeptical of me and me have to jump through hoops to prove myself, than a child not have any adult around them who cares enough to
make sure nothing bad is happening to them.
I am not going to change my stance that healthy skepticism is better than apathy. Ideally, nobody gives anyone a reason for them to be skeptical in the first place, but if I have to choose between the two, I’d rather the safer option that gives predators less access to vulnerable minors.
Nowhere did I say, “people are skeptical of your friendship,” nor did I say, “I am skeptical of your friendship.” I was not encouraging people to look into your friendship. I was talking generally about the possibility, and I wasn’t even talking fully at you. I was further elaborating on my position, because I’m allowed to add to the discussion that was being held.
I don’t know how you think, so the only thing I can surmise is that you’re feeling insulted because you’re unable to realize when I’m talking at you and when I’m talking generally. If that’s the case, it’s difficult to remedy if you don’t believe the person when they explain.
I have never advocated for a strict separation between the two.
Again, I don’t know where you’re getting this position where I think every adult is a potential groomer or that minors and adults shouldn’t interact ever. I think if I had this position, it would have come up earlier in the discussion about the forum’s intended audience. In fact, I recall mentioning in one of my big posts, talking about how I appreciated having adult friends on the forum I went to, since they helped shape me into the person I am today.
Re: Goose
Please read what I said. I never claimed people were harping on Goose for his English – I said to everyone that, if you want to engage with people who don’t communicate well, it’s necessary to be more patient. There was a lack of patience on several people’s parts (but not all – some of you were kind) and I wanted to remind everyone how difficult it is to speak in a third language. A lot of people aren’t used to dealing with someone who struggles to speak English and just talk like they normally do, and treat it like they would any other interaction, which isn’t fair.
When I perceive someone to be ganged up on, I act. This is known. I've literally done this for you. If Goose had said something like, "I hope humans lose their rights!" and got piled up on, then yeah, I'm not gonna run up to say, "Guys, maybe we should deescalate this convo." I'm gonna think, "Well, you dug your own grave there dude."
I’ve spent a lot of time around people who struggle with English and I don't feel bad for assuming the best in someone who hasn't done anything blatantly evil. I have a helper type of personality and I’m willing to give people multiple chances. If Goose was a troll, I still don’t regret the choice to give him the benefit of the doubt. I can be more cautious in the future, with the knowledge that the forum is prone to attacks, but with the information I had at the time, it was reasonable for me to assume Goose wasn’t.
Fearmongering is a strong word and an exaggeration of what happened here. To fearmonger is to exploit, to intentionally make people afraid for a purpose. Was his behavior unreasonable? Sure, it was overprotective, but it was not coming from a place to exploit the masses. It seemed to me he had a genuine concern for the safety of minors, and that’s not wrong, even if it is over-the-top.
Gabby has trolled in the past, but that doesn’t mean every post of theirs is automatically trolling, which is something they’ve also admitted. They said something I thought had merit and that I thought was intelligently and empathetically written. I don’t believe Gabby would have said that if it didn’t come from a point of sincere concern. You don’t have to like someone to acknowledge they have a good point. If I agree with someone whom I don’t personally care for, I’m not going to suddenly dismiss what they’re saying in order to not be “on the same side”. I never commanded anyone to un-ignore Gabby if they have them ignored. Not everyone does however, and not everyone is unwilling to reconsider their position.
I have opinions and I say them. If I feel like there is a conflict between two sides, sometimes I try to mediate because that is, in my experience, the most effective way to reaching a solution. I’d rather try and fail, than watch helplessly as people talk over each other and nothing get resolved. I do not want to yell, assume the worst, or dominate to get my point across, because I have been that way in the past, and it was not only significantly less effective, but I didn’t feel like a good person doing it, even if I did it for the right reasons. When I have the time to choose my words, I’m going to do that (at least when the discussion has turned Very Serious, otherwise I'm obnoxious as usual). Of course, how I choose to express myself or solve problems doesn’t always work out, but nothing is infallible, so it's still the right way
for me.
Accusing or even implying someone is a groomer is a serious claim and not one I would give out lightly. It needs to have weight so that the accusations can be addressed swiftly. If you think I am too neutral of a person, then
why would I casually call you something so heinous, that is the very OPPOSITE of neutral, unprovoked? None of this makes any sense, especially as a survivor.
If I thought you were a groomer, why would I express gratitude for helping a vulnerable girl, and imply you’re a good person for doing so?
If I thought you were a groomer, we would not be having a polite discussion - or even a conversation at all. I would be using my efforts to get you away from vulnerable people.
You’ve insulted me by calling me dense, but it has taken several posts to reiterate
why I haven’t insulted you, and you
still are ignoring my words, choosing to believe what you assumed in the first place. If you’re going to dislike me, I’d appreciate you simply disliking me and not misrepresenting my words, because that is actively harmful.
I can apologize for you feeling bad, because I never intended for you to ruminate and be stuck thinking negatively for hours. That's a horrible feeling. But I won't apologize for you misreading what I said, and choosing to believe a falsehood after I've clarified multiple times.
The only way I can think to prevent this from happening again is to just not engage with you in the future, even when we’re a part of the same discussion. I'd rather be accused of being non-confrontational than be accused of that
and something I never said, especially when I actively took precautions against misunderstandings out of consideration for your feelings.
I didn’t mention this earlier, since I believed you were just hurt yourself, and that it was a simple misunderstanding we could solve together. But you hurt me when you suggested my experience was an outlier. It felt dismissive, not just of what I went through, but of how common child abuse is.
The only reason I shared this publicly was to offer more personal proof to minors that this does happen, and it happened to me. It’s easy for people to dismiss risks when they’ve never experienced them or known someone who has. Sharing my experience also opens the door to letting others know they can reach out if they need someone to talk to.
My DMs are open, but until you acknowledge I didn’t say what you said, I don’t want to continue having this discussion. And as a precaution, if someone else wants to continue this conversation, I’d appreciate you also keeping it to DMs. I really didn’t expect what I said to be more than a one-off mention, and I feel uncomfortable continuing to discuss what happened to me publicly.