srslyman

[Princess]

Just sayin.

 

[Ricano]

I approve this message.

 

[The Sign Painter]

I agree.

 

[Cottonball]

Yes, mam'.

 

[Rawburt]

Did I just walk into a mutiny here? =o

Also, if this is such a pressing issue, why is it in Brewster's?

 

[Princess]

Did I just walk into a mutiny here? =o

Also, if this is such a pressing issue, why is it in Brewster's?

Because anything with Patrick is relaxed.

 

[Rawburt]

Did I just walk into a mutiny here? =o

Also, if this is such a pressing issue, why is it in Brewster's?

Because anything with Patrick is relaxed.

But the fish in the background looks so shocked :O

 

[Cottonball]

Did I just walk into a mutiny here? =o

Also, if this is such a pressing issue, why is it in Brewster's?

Because anything with Patrick is relaxed.

Did you hear about the interns thing with a sponge bob episode?

 

[KoolKitteh]

I second that motion!

 

[Gnome]

I'm down with this yo.

 

[Psychonaut]

I'm not down with this, for the sole reason that activity =/= a good mod.

the mods are who they are for a reason, and those who aren't either haven't proven themselves enough, or are not needed a the time.

I think this is kind of a deal with all forums... there's always a complaint about not having enough mods moderating, or overmoderating.. eh.

mods are only necessary if/when a "troll" comes and posts "shocking" pictures. and even then, it's easy enough to just ignore them.

tl;dr, I say nay.

 

[Princess]

There are some mods who are just fine. But there are a lot of inactive mods who have like even barely made a post this year. I don't see what the point is of them being mod then.

Also, I'm not saying the most active members should be mod. No the ones who are fit for the job.
Derp.

 

[Rawburt]

I'm not down with this, for the sole reason that activity =/= a good mod.

the mods are who they are for a reason, and those who aren't either haven't proven themselves enough, or are not needed a the time.

I think this is kind of a deal with all forums... there's always a complaint about not having enough mods moderating, or overmoderating.. eh.

mods are only necessary if/when a "troll" comes and posts "shocking" pictures. and even then, it's easy enough to just ignore them.

tl;dr, I say nay.

Have to agree with Psychonaut.

I have no problem with the current staff.

 

[SilentHopes]

Request approved.

We do need active moderators, but hire mature active members to be a moderator.

 

[Psychonaut]

There are some mods who are just fine. But there are a lot of inactive mods who have like even barely made a post this year. I don't see what the point is of them being mod then.

Also, I'm not saying the most active members should be mod. No the ones who are fit for the job.
Derp.

if they don't post, but still log in every now and again, I'd say that's borderline-acceptable, sure, but that doesn't mean they have to have their powers revoked/replaced.

I haven't seen anyone clamoring for threads to be deleted/locked for days on end, which, aside from the occasional "trolling" attempt, is about all a mod is good for.

forums can exist without mods/admins. imo, this forum's lucky that both jeremy AND miranda are active, and so nice.

but then again, where I come from, the only mod in sight is the youngest member, and has no clue what he's doing, while the admin is off busy having a life. I think he popped in about once a year, if we were lucky. good times, lots of spam. <3

 

[Princess]

There are some mods who are just fine. But there are a lot of inactive mods who have like even barely made a post this year. I don't see what the point is of them being mod then.

Also, I'm not saying the most active members should be mod. No the ones who are fit for the job.
Derp.

if they don't post, but still log in every now and again, I'd say that's borderline-acceptable, sure, but that doesn't mean they have to have their powers revoked/replaced.

I haven't seen anyone clamoring for threads to be deleted/locked for days on end, which, aside from the occasional "trolling" attempt, is about all a mod is good for.

forums can exist without mods/admins. imo, this forum's lucky that both jeremy AND miranda are active, and so nice.

but then again, where I come from, the only mod in sight is the youngest member, and has no clue what he's doing, while the admin is off busy having a life. I think he popped in about once a year, if we were lucky. good times, lots of spam. <3

loljeremynice

I get what you're saying. But I still feel there's some members here who could be doing a better job than some of the mods.

 

[Psychonaut]

at least he's not god-mod'ing :/

really, I don't understand the dire need for mods in the first place..

so long as everyone stays civil/not a *censored.1.2*, forums and anything else should be fine.

and then there were uncivil, uncouth, unCULT-ivated members.

OH GOD INTERNET SRS BZNS.

 

[Princess]

Kay well dude. You're fine on your own opinion and I'm good on my own.

 

[Lisathegreat!]

Haha xD.

I agree.

 

[Psychonaut]

Kay well dude. You're fine on your own opinion and I'm good on my own.

qft.

either way, I doubt germy's going to add more mods to the staff soon, no matter how much the topic is brought up.

maybe one more. maybe. :3