Kitsuragi
Talk to me, superstar. What do you want?
i think because trades usually dont happen/aren't supposed to happen on this board so they arent necessary. i think they are. could be wrong.
-
Threads in this board should only be bumped once every four or more hours. Animal Crossing trading belongs in Nook's Cranny and other boards located here, even when using TBT Bells.
Scamming and bad transactions
- Thread starter Caius
- Start date
- Status
i think because trades usually dont happen/aren't supposed to happen on this board so they arent necessary. i think they are. could be wrong.
EmmaFrost
matryoshka
Probably because the ratings are based around playing/trading with people over ACNL's wifi connection.
PandaNikita
People Don't Read
This was after she revealed that she scammed.
It's like this:
"Hey everyone, I robbed the bank!"
"GASP! That guy robbed that bank! He should be punished!"
When the offender themselves already revealed that they did the crime, everyone knows that they did it. You can't call it public if they're restating what the offender choose to reveal. Even if they don't "public shame" her, everyone can still know because she posted it herself.
And so what? If she did a crime, she should be punished. What's wrong with saying she should be banned for her offenses?
Final point: People aren't actively going around trying to get embarrass here. In fact, they've still decided to withhold her name even when people have asked who the scammer was. (Which sucks, because then they might get scammed) All they're doing is having their own conversations with said scammer about why what happened to her was fair/why she should be punished.
There's forgiveness for the first crime that happened months ago, and then there's scamming 4 moire people just a few days ago. Of course they should be punished and "not allowed to roam the forums" at least for some time.
It's like this:
"Hey everyone, I robbed the bank!"
"GASP! That guy robbed that bank! He should be punished!"
When the offender themselves already revealed that they did the crime, everyone knows that they did it. You can't call it public if they're restating what the offender choose to reveal. Even if they don't "public shame" her, everyone can still know because she posted it herself.
And so what? If she did a crime, she should be punished. What's wrong with saying she should be banned for her offenses?
Final point: People aren't actively going around trying to get embarrass here. In fact, they've still decided to withhold her name even when people have asked who the scammer was. (Which sucks, because then they might get scammed) All they're doing is having their own conversations with said scammer about why what happened to her was fair/why she should be punished.
There's forgiveness for the first crime that happened months ago, and then there's scamming 4 moire people just a few days ago. Of course they should be punished and "not allowed to roam the forums" at least for some time.
Cadbberry
e g g
I agree with you, if they make it right then it is ok, but do it again and again and don't learn a lesson, that is where it gets a bit pushy
Kitsuragi
Talk to me, superstar. What do you want?
exactly. i wish they'd be on every board too, it's really useful and i dont see why they shouldn't be on every board.
negative ratings shouldn't be removed unless the person who left it says it's okay to remove it. and hopefully, this is the case. some people said that theyre getting removed without approval from the person who left them, which is a scary thought.
Shimmer
(ര̀ᴗര́)و☆
The wifi ratings should be displayed in EVERY board like they used to be. But yeah, the real life transactions are a problem. Not sure how to make those safer besides just trusting the person and winging it. Unless the code gets sent first and tested before sending TBT over? Can't the mods track who's paid TBT to who and who hasn't? Can't they also give and take TBT from users?
I've always used/left them for non-AC transactions too. I mean, I'm just as likely to leave feedback when purchasing a collectible or pokemon with tbt as I am when purchasing an item with AC bells.
But I kind of see why they might be kept separate.
Shayne was scammed by the main culprit, though, which is why she chimed in. Said user (not Shayne) got me in November and four (I believe) others in the last few days.
Shimmer
(ര̀ᴗര́)و☆
I can see why they're separate as well. However, shouldn't they be joined together? You're still technically trading with the person.
Coach
mr struggle
I feel like if they did do Wi-Fi ratings displayed on every board, it could have the totals of positive, neutral and negative visible from the beginning, and drop down menus (Like for the 'Who liked this' thingy) next to each one with Username and comment.
Shimmer
(ര̀ᴗര́)و☆
They have the number of ratings and then the percent. If the user doesn't have 100%, it would be a good idea to click on it and find out why.
-Apples-
Apple Imperialist
What I learned here is that the main admin does not believe in permanent banning. Unless if you're engaged in extreme behavior, they're not going to ban someone forever, no matter how many times. They don't want to lose publicity like ACC was doing. I may agree with their moderation system, but the lack of permabanning is one thing I disagree on. So don't count on wishing permabans upon someone. That's very rare.
I see your point, but don't call out other names and publicize their offenses. That is known as public blacklisting, which the site frowns upon.
I ****ing called it
Fearthecuteness
Oh hai mark
Yes you did. Congrats. Lol
- Status
Similar threads
- Locked
