"Ohio man arrested for cutting grass in public park"

DirtyD said:
No, they are employed by the city. Yes the city officials are paid by the tax payers, but in reality it is up to the city to hire those people. Not us.

And yes, I know it is rare to hurt yourself or someone else by mowing the lawn, but it does happen. I have seen people who have lost limbs by mowing the lawn. I have seen toes and parts of feet all over a lawn, because people are stupid. It is rare, but it happens
So what makes this group of people that call itself the city have total control over other human beings?
 
They're not denying him basic human rights, they're saying he can't mow grass. :P
Without rules there would be an anarchy. There has to be a line in the dirt drawn between "this is a rule" and "this isn't."
 
It isnt that they have control over other human beings, it is that they have control to maintain a city/public park... There are rules on how to do certain things. There are channels he could of gone thru to do it if he wanted to. They have certain procedures on doing it. Like I said, he ended up getting debris everywhere. He caused more work for people.

It is similar to backseat modding. Rather than someone take something into their own hands, people are expected to follow a certain set of rules and procedures to deal with an issue or problem (I.E the report button or to PM a mod).

If someone did not follow these rules, and decided to take matters into their own hands, then that person would be dealt with accordingly. Not because they may have handled the problem improperly, but because they didnt follow the rules & regulations on how to handle that situation
 
DirtyD said:
It isnt that they have control over other human beings, it is that they have control to maintain a city/public park... There are rules on how to do certain things. There are channels he could of gone thru to do it if he wanted to. They have certain procedures on doing it. Like I said, he ended up getting debris everywhere. He caused more work for people.

It is similar to backseat modding. Rather than someone take something into their own hands, people are expected to follow a certain set of rules and procedures to deal with an issue or problem (I.E the report button or to PM a mod).

If someone did not follow these rules, and decided to take matters into their own hands, then that person would be dealt with accordingly. Not because they may have handled the problem improperly, but because they didnt follow the rules & regulations on how to handle that situation
A forum is private property. A park is public property that is supposedly owned by the people, including the man. If there is an issue with public property like this, than there shouldn't be public property to begin with.
 
pear40 said:
They're not denying him basic human rights, they're saying he can't mow grass. :P
Without rules there would be an anarchy. There has to be a line in the dirt drawn between "this is a rule" and "this isn't."
Yes, they are denying his basic right of liberty. This is a good example of a problem that will occur when you declare property to be owned by everyone.
 
stormcommander said:
pear40 said:
They're not denying him basic human rights, they're saying he can't mow grass. :P
Without rules there would be an anarchy. There has to be a line in the dirt drawn between "this is a rule" and "this isn't."
Yes, they are denying his basic right of liberty.
I guess you could see it that way.
It's the principal, not the severity of the offense.
 
But regardless, there are rules and regulations of every city and state park. For example, they close at a certain time, no leaving garbage, ect. There are rules we must all follow or else we would have total anarchy
 
Tom said:
ryudo_dragoon said:
Horus said:
(1) Workers are getting paid by the taxpayers so they don't want this man saving money for the taxpayers. Stereotypical government workers.


:@

:@

Ugh, why can't the government include intelligence? ._.
It was his fault for not listening, but still, stupid reason to get arrested. :l
Honestly, the first thought that should pop into everyone's head when they hear the words United States Congress, is "Those stupid lazy bums raising their own paychecks just because".

Or something similar.
Damn, truth sucks. :O

And lmao at DirtyD and Storm having a debate. c:
 
DirtyD said:
But regardless, there are rules and regulations of every city and state park. For example, they close at a certain time, no leaving garbage, ect. There are rules we must all follow or else we would have total anarchy
Rules to protect life, liberty, and property. Not infringe on them.
 
But the point still remains that he could of hurt someone or himself. If he would have (Despite how rare it is) our tax dollars would be through the roof due to it being on city property.
 
DirtyD said:
But the point still remains that he could of hurt someone or himself. If he would have (Despite how rare it is) our tax dollars would be through the roof due to it being on city property.
That's really just an excuse. It's equally rare that one of the employees would hurt someone. And if he hurts someone, he would be sued. Not the town.
 
Not being on city property. I know lawyers in Ohio that would take up that case (I work in legal services). Especially if they hadnt stopped him, and then he hurt someone. They would have been in some real deep doo doo
 
Let's say you're walking in the park normally and not cutting the grass. You then throw a rock at someone and they are injured. Who's fault is it?
 
this is shockingly sad! the Park is for the ppl! By the ppl!
What has America come to, it's almost a laughing stock to other nations.
 
Back
Top