Megamannt125
Senior Member
That is so no reason to elect the man. Racism has no place in this country. Who cares if he's black, or yellow, or pink with blue polka dots? By now, you'd think America would have moved past sexism and racism.Although I'm not American, or eligible to vote, I would like to see Obama as President again. Let's be honest, he's the first black President America has ever had. People were weeping with joy in the streets when he was elected.
That is so no reason to elect the man. Racism has no place in this country. Who cares if he's black, or yellow, or pink with blue polka dots? By now, you'd think America would have moved past sexism and racism.
That is so no reason to elect the man. Racism has no place in this country. Who cares if he's black, or yellow, or pink with blue polka dots? By now, you'd think America would have moved past sexism and racism.
I'm saying that "because Obama was the first black president" shouldn't have any bearing on whether or not he gets reelected.Are you accusing him of racism? Like, i'm really asking.... Because I have no idea what you're trying to say.
I'm saying that "because Obama was the first black president" shouldn't have any bearing on whether or not he gets reelected.
Voting on someone because they're black is racism. (I couldn't think of a clever quip/song reply.)Then what's racism got to do-
got to do with it?
But how is that ONLY Obama. The thing is that War has been proven as a way for a country to earn money fast, and it was widely accepted after WW2, that doing so would be an automatic fix for the economy. We're just now learning that something like that doesn't exactly work anymore, as proven with Vietnam and the Middle East. There's also other reaspns for US involvement past imperialism. Take for instance North Korea and South Korea, which has US forces deployed on the DMZ at their request.
Or maybe you mean Lybia? The people there were asking for help, but after something like that you have to have a cleanup, and that's the part that promotes backlash. Though, no I don't agree with the invasion of a country, I don't think that the intention is imperialism, I think that usually the intention might be something a little more sincere but is taken the wrong way. However, when you look at the Iraq War, which is still a pile of nonsense in my books, (Not started by obama might I add) you're going to find that yes, THAT was an imperialistic move.
Honestly I'm not concerned with Obama being imperialistic. i don't see it.
Bacon Boy said:It was imperialist after a few years. Originally, it was an actual act or retaliation. Think about it. Almost everyone was for the war in Iraq after 9/11. However, I agree that it should not have lasted that long. Imperialism is when you take over a country. From what is universally understood, the US hasn't tried taking over another country in a while.
Granted, the wars should have stopped after a few years. But being like "lol why did American go to Iraq to hunt Al-Qaeda? It was only millions of American deaths and a big hit to the global economy." The retaliation to 9/11 was every bit justified.I never said it was ONLY Obama, I said he was continuing on with America's imperialistic thirsts.
Also
Act of retaliation? I find that hard to believe after the Northwood documents were released..
And Imperialism doesn't always include flat out taking over a country..........
Wow you just completely ignored what I said and posted a definition.Granted, the wars should have stopped after a few years. But being like "lol why did American go to Iraq to hunt Al-Qaeda? It was only millions of American deaths and a big hit to the global economy." The retaliation to 9/11 was every bit justified.
Also:
im?pe?ri?al?ism [im-peer-ee-uh-liz-uhm]
noun
1.
the policy of extending the rule or authority of an empire or nation over foreign countries, or of acquiring and holding colonies and dependencies.
2.
advocacy of imperial interests.
3.
an imperial system of government.
4.
imperial government.
5.
British . the policy of so uniting the separate parts of an empire with separate governments as to secure for certain purposes a single state.
Thanks for responding! Great debate really!Romney wants to cut spending towards PBS. Afterwards, he said he likes PBS and he likes Big Bird, but he wants to cut down on its funding.