.-mez said:They should have kept it the way it was.
^Pear said:Meh, I don't really like it. What's the point of offering 1080p, 720p, etc? It would've been more streamlined just to keep it HD, HQ, and normal.
^^^^Crayola said:Youtube 06 = <3
You, Person A, have a 6 second long part of a song that isn't even available on itunes in your video, BANHAMMER.Tyeforce said:I don't understand why so many people are against the new layout... It's not like they really changed much. But I do have to agree, YouTube '06 FTW. I still like YouTube, though, but Google is kinda ruining it...
What does that have to do with the new layout? And they stopped removing videos for copyrighted material. They just put an ad for the song on the video's page and a ]my video[/url]. =pPear said:You, Person A, have a 6 second long part of a song that isn't even available on itunes in your video, BANHAMMER.Tyeforce said:I don't understand why so many people are against the new layout... It's not like they really changed much. But I do have to agree, YouTube '06 FTW. I still like YouTube, though, but Google is kinda ruining it...
You, Person B, have illegally posted the full music video to fireflies, continue with your business.
You were talking about pre-google youtube.Tyeforce said:What does that have to do with the new layout? And they stopped removing videos for copyrighted material. They just put an ad for the song on the video's page and a ]my video[/url]. =pPear said:You, Person A, have a 6 second long part of a song that isn't even available on itunes in your video, BANHAMMER.Tyeforce said:I don't understand why so many people are against the new layout... It's not like they really changed much. But I do have to agree, YouTube '06 FTW. I still like YouTube, though, but Google is kinda ruining it...
You, Person B, have illegally posted the full music video to fireflies, continue with your business.
Very funny video. xDTyeforce said:What does that have to do with the new layout? And they stopped removing videos for copyrighted material. They just put an ad for the song on the video's page and a ]my video[/url]. =pPear said:You, Person A, have a 6 second long part of a song that isn't even available on itunes in your video, BANHAMMER.Tyeforce said:I don't understand why so many people are against the new layout... It's not like they really changed much. But I do have to agree, YouTube '06 FTW. I still like YouTube, though, but Google is kinda ruining it...
You, Person B, have illegally posted the full music video to fireflies, continue with your business.
In the second half, yes. But I said "I don't understand why so many people are against the new layout...", not "I don't understand why so many people are against post-Google YouTube..."Pear said:You were talking about pre-google youtube.Tyeforce said:What does that have to do with the new layout? And they stopped removing videos for copyrighted material. They just put an ad for the song on the video's page and a ]my video[/url]. =pPear said:You, Person A, have a 6 second long part of a song that isn't even available on itunes in your video, BANHAMMER.Tyeforce said:I don't understand why so many people are against the new layout... It's not like they really changed much. But I do have to agree, YouTube '06 FTW. I still like YouTube, though, but Google is kinda ruining it...
You, Person B, have illegally posted the full music video to fireflies, continue with your business.