Expelled

[Prezintenden]

Quoting limited to 5 levels deep

I'm not following your logic on how it's racist...

Well, in that thinking, that means anyone with deformities should be wiped out. And according to Hitler, deformities include skin abnormalities along with messed up body parts.

Wut.

It's not saying that deformities should be wiped out, it's just what happens...

But if "mother nature" or the natural order of things doesn't allow imperfections, why should the creations?

Okay, wait. Did you just ask why imperfect creatures are created if they get killed by their inability to follow the ones better-off?

 

[-C*-]

Quoting limited to 5 levels deep

I'm not following your logic on how it's racist...

Well, in that thinking, that means anyone with deformities should be wiped out. And according to Hitler, deformities include skin abnormalities along with messed up body parts.

That's not necessarily race-specific.

While certain races may have higher risks of getting certain disease or having certain attributes, the deformities and whatnot are solely person to person.

Deformities =/= Different Skin Color

True, and it can be perceived in different ways. Take someone who has never seen anyone with another color of skin, to that person, a skin color change would be a deformity, because in their range of thinking, everyone has that color of skin.

But you were calling evolution and survival of the fittest racist, when in actuality, it isn't.

Evolution isn't a person and has no opinion. It doesn't see. It's a process.

 

[Bacon Boy]

Quoting limited to 5 levels deep

Well, in that thinking, that means anyone with deformities should be wiped out. And according to Hitler, deformities include skin abnormalities along with messed up body parts.

That's not necessarily race-specific.

While certain races may have higher risks of getting certain disease or having certain attributes, the deformities and whatnot are solely person to person.

Deformities =/= Different Skin Color

True, and it can be perceived in different ways. Take someone who has never seen anyone with another color of skin, to that person, a skin color change would be a deformity, because in their range of thinking, everyone has that color of skin.

But you were calling evolution and survival of the fittest racist, when in actuality, it isn't.

Evolution isn't a person and has no opinion. It doesn't see. It's a process.

No, but Evolutionists can be. They can see an imperfected person as a threat to the natural order. They might see them as a waste of money, food, time, etc. Therefore, they must be eliminated. Controlled Population, only the ones that can fend for themselves should stay alive. That should not be an option; if you see a person on the side of the road, who obviously is sickly, deformed, or in anyway, can't fend for themselves, should you just leave them out there to die?

 

[Furry Sparks]

Quoting limited to 5 levels deep

That's not necessarily race-specific.

While certain races may have higher risks of getting certain disease or having certain attributes, the deformities and whatnot are solely person to person.

Deformities =/= Different Skin Color

True, and it can be perceived in different ways. Take someone who has never seen anyone with another color of skin, to that person, a skin color change would be a deformity, because in their range of thinking, everyone has that color of skin.

But you were calling evolution and survival of the fittest racist, when in actuality, it isn't.

Evolution isn't a person and has no opinion. It doesn't see. It's a process.

No, but Evolutionists can be. They can see an imperfected person as a threat to the natural order. They might see them as a waste of money, food, time, etc. Therefore, they must be eliminated. Controlled Population, only the ones that can fend for themselves should stay alive. That should not be an option; if you see a person on the side of the road, who obviously is sickly, deformed, or in anyway, can't fend for themselves, should you just leave them out there to die?

Stereotypes ftw.

(Didn't we already go over this?)

 

[-C*-]

Quoting limited to 5 levels deep

That's not necessarily race-specific.

While certain races may have higher risks of getting certain disease or having certain attributes, the deformities and whatnot are solely person to person.

Deformities =/= Different Skin Color

True, and it can be perceived in different ways. Take someone who has never seen anyone with another color of skin, to that person, a skin color change would be a deformity, because in their range of thinking, everyone has that color of skin.

But you were calling evolution and survival of the fittest racist, when in actuality, it isn't.

Evolution isn't a person and has no opinion. It doesn't see. It's a process.

No, but Evolutionists can be. They can see an imperfected person as a threat to the natural order. They might see them as a waste of money, food, time, etc. Therefore, they must be eliminated. Controlled Population, only the ones that can fend for themselves should stay alive. That should not be an option; if you see a person on the side of the road, who obviously is sickly, deformed, or in anyway, can't fend for themselves, should you just leave them out there to die?

You're making no sense.

Most people that believe in evolution don't go "YOU'RE SICK, TIME TO DIE."

They let it take its course and don't interfere.

 

[Bacon Boy]

Quoting limited to 5 levels deep

True, and it can be perceived in different ways. Take someone who has never seen anyone with another color of skin, to that person, a skin color change would be a deformity, because in their range of thinking, everyone has that color of skin.

But you were calling evolution and survival of the fittest racist, when in actuality, it isn't.

Evolution isn't a person and has no opinion. It doesn't see. It's a process.

No, but Evolutionists can be. They can see an imperfected person as a threat to the natural order. They might see them as a waste of money, food, time, etc. Therefore, they must be eliminated. Controlled Population, only the ones that can fend for themselves should stay alive. That should not be an option; if you see a person on the side of the road, who obviously is sickly, deformed, or in anyway, can't fend for themselves, should you just leave them out there to die?

Stereotypes ftw.

(Didn't we already go over this?)

How is that stereotyping? Please explain.

 

[Bacon Boy]

Quoting limited to 5 levels deep

True, and it can be perceived in different ways. Take someone who has never seen anyone with another color of skin, to that person, a skin color change would be a deformity, because in their range of thinking, everyone has that color of skin.

But you were calling evolution and survival of the fittest racist, when in actuality, it isn't.

Evolution isn't a person and has no opinion. It doesn't see. It's a process.

No, but Evolutionists can be. They can see an imperfected person as a threat to the natural order. They might see them as a waste of money, food, time, etc. Therefore, they must be eliminated. Controlled Population, only the ones that can fend for themselves should stay alive. That should not be an option; if you see a person on the side of the road, who obviously is sickly, deformed, or in anyway, can't fend for themselves, should you just leave them out there to die?

You're making no sense.

Most people that believe in evolution don't go "YOU'RE SICK, TIME TO DIE."

They let it take its course and don't interfere.

exactly, but shouldn't you try to help the person instead of just letting whatever happens happen?

 

[-C*-]

Quoting limited to 5 levels deep

But you were calling evolution and survival of the fittest racist, when in actuality, it isn't.

Evolution isn't a person and has no opinion. It doesn't see. It's a process.

No, but Evolutionists can be. They can see an imperfected person as a threat to the natural order. They might see them as a waste of money, food, time, etc. Therefore, they must be eliminated. Controlled Population, only the ones that can fend for themselves should stay alive. That should not be an option; if you see a person on the side of the road, who obviously is sickly, deformed, or in anyway, can't fend for themselves, should you just leave them out there to die?

You're making no sense.

Most people that believe in evolution don't go "YOU'RE SICK, TIME TO DIE."

They let it take its course and don't interfere.

exactly, but shouldn't you try to help the person instead of just letting whatever happens happen?

You misunderstand.

They are going to do what they need to do. Evolution and survival of the fittest will happen, you can't stop it.

You'd help the person and wouldn't do any harm. Any person that believes evolution would most likely do the same. At least, the ones I know.

 

[The Sign Painter]

This may sound weird, but I am a Christian Evolutionist.

 

[Bacon Boy]

Quoting limited to 5 levels deep

No, but Evolutionists can be. They can see an imperfected person as a threat to the natural order. They might see them as a waste of money, food, time, etc. Therefore, they must be eliminated. Controlled Population, only the ones that can fend for themselves should stay alive. That should not be an option; if you see a person on the side of the road, who obviously is sickly, deformed, or in anyway, can't fend for themselves, should you just leave them out there to die?

You're making no sense.

Most people that believe in evolution don't go "YOU'RE SICK, TIME TO DIE."

They let it take its course and don't interfere.

exactly, but shouldn't you try to help the person instead of just letting whatever happens happen?

You misunderstand.

They are going to do what they need to do. Evolution and survival of the fittest will happen, you can't stop it.

You'd help the person and wouldn't do any harm. Any person that believes evolution would most likely do the same. At least, the ones I know.

Well again, there are a couple of types. Some perceive things a different way. Some might try to help. While some blow them off.

 

[Bacon Boy]

This may sound weird, but I am a Christian Evolutionist.

explain your beliefs, i've heard of such

 

[-C*-]

Quoting limited to 5 levels deep

You're making no sense.

Most people that believe in evolution don't go "YOU'RE SICK, TIME TO DIE."

They let it take its course and don't interfere.

exactly, but shouldn't you try to help the person instead of just letting whatever happens happen?

You misunderstand.

They are going to do what they need to do. Evolution and survival of the fittest will happen, you can't stop it.

You'd help the person and wouldn't do any harm. Any person that believes evolution would most likely do the same. At least, the ones I know.

Well again, there are a couple of types. Some perceive things a different way. Some might try to help. While some blow them off.

In other words, people will be people.

You can't stereotype an entire group of people because they believe in something.

 

[Bacon Boy]

Quoting limited to 5 levels deep

exactly, but shouldn't you try to help the person instead of just letting whatever happens happen?

You misunderstand.

They are going to do what they need to do. Evolution and survival of the fittest will happen, you can't stop it.

You'd help the person and wouldn't do any harm. Any person that believes evolution would most likely do the same. At least, the ones I know.

Well again, there are a couple of types. Some perceive things a different way. Some might try to help. While some blow them off.

In other words, people will be people.

You can't stereotype an entire group of people because they believe in something.

Did I ever say all Evolutionists were the same? (If I did, I'm sorry, i did not intend for that.)

 

[-C*-]

Quoting limited to 5 levels deep

You misunderstand.

They are going to do what they need to do. Evolution and survival of the fittest will happen, you can't stop it.

You'd help the person and wouldn't do any harm. Any person that believes evolution would most likely do the same. At least, the ones I know.

Well again, there are a couple of types. Some perceive things a different way. Some might try to help. While some blow them off.

In other words, people will be people.

You can't stereotype an entire group of people because they believe in something.

Did I ever say all Evolutionists were the same? (If I did, I'm sorry, i did not intend for that.)

No, but you are saying tha-

I don't even know what you're saying.

Get it together and I'll get back to you.

 

[Bacon Boy]

Quoting limited to 5 levels deep

Well again, there are a couple of types. Some perceive things a different way. Some might try to help. While some blow them off.

In other words, people will be people.

You can't stereotype an entire group of people because they believe in something.

Did I ever say all Evolutionists were the same? (If I did, I'm sorry, i did not intend for that.)

No, but you are saying tha-

I don't even know what you're saying.

Get it together and I'll get back to you.

Sorry, let me summarize what I'm trying to say.

There are two types of Evolutionists, just like there are two types of every RELIGION. There are regular people, then there are extremists. Hitler, Stallin, people like them were extremist Evolutionists. They believed that any imperfection "nature" allowed needed to exterminated. Others not so extreme, but those like Dawkins, who target Christians and Creationists and try to make them look bad, hurt Evolutionism by making it look like all Evolutionists target Creationists and try to kill freedom of speech. Some Evolutionists will just let things take their course and let everything slide by and say "it's all part of the natural order, we are born, we live, then we just die and our live ends." Some other ones, take action and try to help the poor and defenseless. These are the goods ones whose names are besmirched by the extremists. Extremists are usually bad in most religions. Christians, Muslims, Darwinism, etc. They're bad and they drag their religion of mindset through the mud.

Like FS said, "Some Christians kill gays, but we don't stereotype them all just because of one mistake." (Paraphrased) And like last night, the gay and straight deal we went through last night, mainly about stereotypes. (I have my reason as to why I was scared of them.)

 

[-C*-]

So you're still trying to stereotype people.

 

[Bulerias]

You're wrong, sorry. The middle ground is a belief in God and evolution. The two can coexist... admittedly, the Christian God is incompatible with evolution because, according to the Bible, He created man "in His image"...

 

[Bacon Boy]

So you're still trying to stereotype people.

no, i split it up. I said, that there are extremists, and then there are the good ones. The good ones are those who do not deserve the mocking and the hatred, which they get because of the bad ones.

 

[-C*-]

So you're still trying to stereotype people.

no, i split it up. I said, that there are extremists, and then there are the good ones. The good ones are those who do not deserve the mocking and the hatred, which they get because of the bad ones.

That's still stereotyping.

 

[royal 9999]

Who has seen the movie. I thought it was very good. Whether you're ID or not, I recommend it. It shows what has happened to our country and our "freedom of speech". What we used to have was a good country, supported on morals, now, it is becoming like Germany during HItler and Satllin. Our freedom of speech is being attacked, not just Christians, but everyone now. Any religion talked about in school that preaches intelligent design (Christianity, Judaism, Islam, Hinduism, etc.).

Creationism isn't just Christianity, it's any religion that preaches that there is a god of some sort. You're either Creationist or Evolutionist. You can't be in the middle. I'm not sending this from a Christian standpoint, but as a Creationist standpoint. People say that Darwinism is science, not religion. But this is not true, it is becoming a religion.

Just felt like saying this. I do not know why, I got bored, and I'm hungry.

Satllin Stalin