'callout culture'

Status
Not open for further replies.
if theyre doing something wrong and they think its right then yes call them the f*** out!
 
I've been dogpiled on TBTF many times. It's not a fun experience I tell you.

TBT has sizable number Tumblr users, it's no surprise some of its toxic bullying culture leaks onto this site. Just be sure to report them, the mods here don't put up with that **** for a second.

Using the word "problematic" instantly invalidates anything someone says because that's part of the tumblr mob culture that goes after people for the tiniest thing e.g. using the wrong pronouns by accident or not being "educated" on the new genders that are popping up every 10 seconds or for wearing henna/saris given to them by indian host families

Tumblr is disgusting when it comes to social justice because there is no actual JUSTICE. It's all a bunch of angry 15 year olds edgelords that tell people to kill themselves when someone uses a "she" pronoun by accident. They're the people that dox those that do what they consider "wrong" and go so far as to dox their FAMILY MEMBERS and call their WORK PLACE to get them fired. They're also the people that are supporting people like Alison Rapp.

Honestly just vile. Calling someone out for doing something wrong like theft or hit and run or rape or pedophilia is different. Callout culture is what I posted about above. Callout culture is disgusting and if you're doing it, you're part of the problem.

You. I like you.
 
Last edited:
Ohh, ok, thanks.

I've had some bad experiences here, but I've never been insulted by large groups of people. There's just a couple certain people on here that try and get at me for everything.

tbh the only bad experiences ive had here is ppl calling me "stupid/assenine" for saying that legend of zelda should die off already, and being called a "furry" for liking the palicos from mh4u :/
 
tbh the only bad experiences ive had here is ppl calling me "stupid/assenine" for saying that legend of zelda should die off already, and being called a "furry" for liking the palicos from mh4u :/

Lmaoo really xD

People have taken the piss out of me by saying I'm a weeaboo, I create loads of alt accounts and talk with them and that I pretend to be pollo-vegetarian for attention. There's also another that I want to be bisexual so I can be "cool and ~edgy~".
lmfao
 
Lmaoo really xD

People have taken the piss out of me by saying I'm a weeaboo, I create loads of alt accounts and talk with them and that I pretend to be pollo-vegetarian for attention. There's also another that I want to be bisexual so I can be "cool and ~edgy~".
lmfao

lol wtf XDDD, lmfao!!
 
"if they're attracted to a certain group of people" it's absolutely necessary to call this out when a cis person claims they're only attracted to other cis people/refuses to date trans people or if a white person says they only find white people attractive. its not a question of preference, its a question of transphobic and racist ideals altering a person's perspective on what is and isn't attractive and who is and isn't worthy of love. I have no idea what "going by a name they shouldn't" means tbh

calling someone out in the form of explaining why what the said was wrong/harmful is absolutely needed, sending suicide threats and constantly harassing someone isn't.
 
Last edited:
"if they're attracted to a certain group of people" it's absolutely necessary to call this out when a cis person claims they're only attracted to other cis people/refuses to date trans people or if a white person says they only find white people attractive. its not a question of preference, its a question of transphobic and racist ideals altering a person's perspective on what is and isn't attractive and who is and isn't worthy of love. I have no idea what "going by a name they shouldn't" means tbh

calling someone out in the form of explaining why what the said was wrong/harmful is absolutely needed, sending suicide threats and constantly harassing someone isn't.


So you support bully culture ok
 
"if they're attracted to a certain group of people" it's absolutely necessary to call this out when a cis person claims they're only attracted to other cis people/refuses to date trans people or if a white person says they only find white people attractive. its not a question of preference, its a question of transphobic and racist ideals altering a person's perspective on what is and isn't attractive and who is and isn't worthy of love.
That's literally taking consent away from the cis people, simply because they happen to have sexual preferences. Something every person on the planet has.

Apart from that, it means you judge all devout Christians, Muslims, Jews, etc. for not accepting relationships that go outside their religious regulations.
 
So you support bully culture ok
I literally just said that harassing someone is incorrect and that I only support calling out in the form of correcting someone and having a calm conversation about why you disagree with what they said

Being against transphobia and racism doesn't mean I support bullying, I think you're a little confused.
 
Wait, do some of you people think it's okay to ''callout'' pedophiles? I mean rape is horrible, but pedophiles still have human rights and therefore should not be publically shamed. I mean a lot of you are from America, where pedophiles are on a public list, but please do remember that not every pedophile is even actually a pedophile. You can get marked a pedophile for peeing at a childs playground at night, and you can also get falsely blamed, so please don't assume the worst of people immediately. And again pedophiles are people too and there are plenty of closet pedophiles, who are sexually into children but keep it to themselves because they're aware of it being a bad thing. Also even if a pedophile reforms, they are still kept on the list.

Anyway what the hell is this callout culture? I'm pretty sure calling out people because they did something you don't like has been an immature thing people do for forever. I mean it makes sense for it to be a stronger thing specifically in tumblr, but god.

Also what? Cis people aren't allowed to have preferences? There are 7 billion people in this world. Even if 50% of them thought you were undateable, still 3,5b would remain. So why care about what other people prefer? There's always someone who will love you for what you are and you are not helping your chances by bitterly condemning people for their personal preferences. And do keep in mind that most people won't be 100% guided by their preferences. A person who thought that they wouldn't love a trans might fall in love with a trans.
 
That's literally taking consent away from the cis people, simply because they happen to have sexual preferences. Something every person on the planet has.

Apart from that, it means you judge all devout Christians, Muslims, Jews, etc. for not accepting relationships that go outside their religious regulations.

it's not taking consent away from anyone?? but there are cases where cis people are attracted to someone trans and are interested in dating UNTIL they find out they're trans and then they don't want to date them just because they're trans. if you aren't interested in someone, you aren't interested, but if you're interested up until you discover someone's trans, that's transphobic.

I like girls. I'm non binary. I don't care if a girl has a penis, vagina, or was defined at intersex at birth. A girl is a girl, if I'm interested in her, I'm interested in her. I don't determine my attraction based on whether someone is cis or trans. Determining your attraction based on whether someone is cis or not is an act of transphobia. I didn't even mention sex, yet you automatically linked trans people to genitalia. Trans people are more than their genitals, you have NO idea what a person's genitals are without them telling you. You have no idea whether a trans girl has a penis or vagina, whether a trans boy has a penis or vagina. So to refuse to date someone you were previously attracted to because you found out they were trans is an act of transphobia and an act of making assumptions about their genitals. Because in reality you have no idea what parts someone does and doesn't have. It's not taking consent away from cis people because dating someone doesn't mean you have to have sex with someone, only partaking in sexual acts you are comfortable with is essential to any healthy relationship; no one ever said "lets FORCE this cis person to have sex with a trans person", it's a case of viewing people as people and not as parts.

religions don't consist of groups of people of only one skin colour
 
That's literally taking consent away from the cis people, simply because they happen to have sexual preferences. Something every person on the planet has.

My main problem with "I'm not attracted to trans people" is it's assuming trans people have a certain look. If someone's post-op and on HRT how would you know if you're dating a trans person? If you suddenly aren't attracted to them when they tell you they were born differently than they appear now then that's pretty nasty.

Apart from that, it means you judge all devout Christians, Muslims, Jews, etc. for not accepting relationships that go outside their religious regulations.
We know damn well that's not the same thing.
Only dating someone who's a part of your religion is different than not dating an entire race. It's similar to the issue above: Saying "I don't think asian men are attractive" is claiming all Asian men have the same shape, same colour, and same size and is bottom line, racist. Someone from Thailand doesn't look like someone from Korea, or someone from Cambodia or India or China or Malaysia. Dating people within your religion is not looking down on people for a stereotypical look they have.

*snorts loudly*
 
Last edited:
My main problem with "I'm not attracted to trans people" is it's assuming trans people have a certain look. If someone's post-op and on HRT how would you know if you're dating a trans person? If you suddenly aren't attracted to them when they tell you they were born differently than they appear now then that's pretty nasty.


We know damn well that's not the same thing.
Only dating someone who's a part of your religion is different than not dating an entire race. It's similar to the issue above: Saying "I don't think asian men are attractive" is claiming all Asian men have the same shape, same colour, and same size and is bottom line, racist. Someone from Thailand doesn't look like someone from Korea, or someone from Cambodia or India or China or Malaysia. Dating people within your religion is not looking down on people for a stereotypical look they have.


*snorts loudly*

thank u sm this is exactly the point i'm trying to make
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top