Black Ops: Pentagon Zombies

SSgt. Garrett said:
FarrenTheRobot said:
This makes buying the game worth it.

I mean, you are *censored.3.0*ing Richard Nixon fighting zombies.
>Implying it wasn't before.
Frankly I don't expect to be impressed by this game. Treyarch has yet to make a good Call of Duty game, in my opinion.
 
There was an amazing comment, "Next DLC, Obama and Palin."
I would need to change my shorts.
 
*trevor said:
SSgt. Garrett said:
FarrenTheRobot said:
This makes buying the game worth it.

I mean, you are *censored.3.0*ing Richard Nixon fighting zombies.
>Implying it wasn't before.
Frankly I don't expect to be impressed by this game. Treyarch has yet to make a good Call of Duty game, in my opinion.
I agree with this statement but this looks outstanding

Zombies
Story
Offline training!
 
Animefan said:
Treyach = awesome guys
IW= douches
All Treyarch has ever done was build off of IW's superior game. Take Call of Duty 3, which built off of IW's successful CoD and CoD 2. World at War was created just to capitalize on (again, IW's) massively-popular Call of Duty 4, especially known for its multiplayer. World at War was built entirely on the engine that IW built, as with Black Ops. Black Ops is just a repeat of the first cycle of Activision using Treyarch to capitalize on IW's success.
 
*trevor said:
Animefan said:
Treyach = awesome guys
IW= douches
All Treyarch has ever done was build off of IW's superior game. Take Call of Duty 3, which built off of IW's successful CoD and CoD 2. World at War was created just to capitalize on (again, IW's) massively-popular Call of Duty 4, especially known for its multiplayer. World at War was built entirely on the engine that IW built, as with Black Ops. Black Ops is just a repeat of the first cycle of Activision using Treyarch to capitalize on IW's success.
But just because WAW uses Mw1's engine doesnt meen IW is automatically better
IMO WAW >Cod 4
Also It seems to me like treyarch care more for there community after all black ops is basically puts every single good thing about call of duty in it and takes away most of the hated things
While MW2 was more in for the money since everything was more expensive than last time for example
Map packs on WAW where 5 pound and had 3 maps + a zombie map
Map packs in MW2 where 15 pounds with 3 new maps and 2 RE USED maps
Also the pc version costed more than it should apparently and lacked dedicated servers
I have much stuff to say about Treyarch > IW but it would take a long time
P.sTreyarch map packs > IW map packs
 
Animefan said:
But just because WAW uses Mw1's engine doesnt meen IW is automatically better
IMO WAW >Cod 4

Map packs on WAW where 5 pound and had 3 maps + a zombie map
Map packs in MW2 where 15 pounds with 3 new maps and 2 RE USED maps
Well, it does really.. as Treyarch would have made their own engine. But I suppose what isn't broken, no need to be fixed.

And what's that? In your opinion? Well, isn't that swell. Looks like we all do.

Again, reused maps because they were good, decent maps.
 
Isn't Black Ops built off the IW engine? I read it somewhere it was.
 
Back
Top