What's Bothering You?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Also friend can you please try and understand why I said I'm sorry.. Yes I overreacted but you are commenting on that like every. single. time. I hardly even do that and when I do you also do it. It's like... uh yeah go work in service where you have to clean and carry stuff and walk all day and your feet and hands will be like that too. And I try look away from you acting like a parent but some time or another I had to snap even if it wasn't personal...
 
Last edited:
I just learned about Canada's C-16 law and how bad it is.

Yep, I'm not gonna bother visiting Canada anytime. I wouldn't mind visiting another country, but I can't follow that.
 
Last edited:
The side of my face is still killing me...might have to go to the hospital.
 
the endless wait for the mail

I just learned about Canada's C-16 law and how bad it is.

Yep, I'm not gonna bother visiting Canada anytime. I wouldn't mind visiting another country, but I can't follow that.

the only way it would ever affect you is if you felt like discriminating against transgender people in the workplace/school or committing a hate crime
 
the endless wait for the mail



the only way it would ever affect you is if you felt like discriminating against transgender people in the workplace/school or committing a hate crime

I can handle recognizing transgender people by their gender identities. What I don't like is how they declared that there are more than two genders by law, and you have to use these gendered pronouns that aren't real in the US. Even denying that there are more than two genders is against the law. I say that you can believe what you want to believe, but if the law forces it on someone, that's wrong. I wouldn't mind visiting, but I wouldn't show support for states (whether it means countries or subdivisions like provinces) that passed SJW laws (not laws against hate speech, but laws declaring progressive opinions as facts).
 
I can handle recognizing transgender people by their gender identities. What I don't like is how they declared that there are more than two genders by law, and you have to use these gendered pronouns that aren't real in the US. Even denying that there are more than two genders is against the law. I say that you can believe what you want to believe, but if the law forces it on someone, that's wrong. I wouldn't mind visiting, but I wouldn't show support for states (whether it means countries or subdivisions like provinces) that passed SJW laws (not laws against hate speech, but laws declaring progressive opinions as facts).

It's not like you're forced to change your worldviews, they just expect you to extend basic respect to other people regardless of how they identify. It's not hard to call people by the names/pronouns they prefer and I really don't understand how anyone gets bent out of shape about it haha.. but that's just my onion. :]
 
Last edited:
It's not like you're forced to change your worldviews, they just expect you to extend basic respect to other people regardless of how they identify. It's not hard to call people by the names/pronouns they prefer and I really don't understand how anyone gets bent out of shape about it haha.. but that's just my onion. :]
After all, opinions are like onions. Some are good, and some are bad.

Alolan-Apples making me do Calculus at 11pm smfh
I actually like that integration technique I tried to make you do.
 
I can handle recognizing transgender people by their gender identities. What I don't like is how they declared that there are more than two genders by law, and you have to use these gendered pronouns that aren't real in the US. Even denying that there are more than two genders is against the law. I say that you can believe what you want to believe, but if the law forces it on someone, that's wrong. I wouldn't mind visiting, but I wouldn't show support for states (whether it means countries or subdivisions like provinces) that passed SJW laws (not laws against hate speech, but laws declaring progressive opinions as facts).

/: boo hoo

but it?s not making stupid opinions illegal, it?s making it illegal to discriminate ppl because of stupid opinions
 
I can handle recognizing transgender people by their gender identities. What I don't like is how they declared that there are more than two genders by law, and you have to use these gendered pronouns that aren't real in the US. Even denying that there are more than two genders is against the law. I say that you can believe what you want to believe, but if the law forces it on someone, that's wrong.
Oh, you. The law is not forcing anyone to believe anything, nor could it.

As long as you aren't going out of your way to deliberately discriminate against or criticize people with the direct intent to offend or discomfort them, you are not going to get into any legal trouble. Surely you don't think all verbal harassment and discrimination should be defended unconditionally by free speech, right? So why should this differ from the laws which, for instance, protect conservatives from being personally targeted for their beliefs?

There are so many more important things to lament about than minorities asking for a little basic tolerance. :rolleyes: All they want is laws to discourage people from using their gender identity as a weapon against them.
 
the person i love, i've had a crush on for almost a year and she's with someone who she's loved for a long time. it just hurts my heart thinking about it
 
Living almost one month in a very unfinished home.. I don't even have a kitchen and we still have to wait up to one more month
to finally get the money to renovate the house. It's frustrating to live in a house like that.. I mean, I have to make the freaking
dishes in a super small sink, because the sink in the kitchen is so disgusting, that it's not even possible to get clean water out of it
anymore and yet we don't have money yet to change it <-<
 
Oh, you. The law is not forcing anyone to believe anything, nor could it.

As long as you aren't going out of your way to deliberately discriminate against or criticize people with the direct intent to offend or discomfort them, you are not going to get into any legal trouble. Surely you don't think all verbal harassment and discrimination should be defended unconditionally by free speech, right? So why should this differ from the laws which, for instance, protect conservatives from being personally targeted for their beliefs?

There are so many more important things to lament about than minorities asking for a little basic tolerance. :rolleyes: All they want is laws to discourage people from using their gender identity as a weapon against them.

Thanks for clarifying that. But just letting you know, I stand behind college professor Jordan Peterson, and on a slightly related note, fully support James Damore. I wouldn't support or defend those who support discrimination or hatred towards other groups, but I generally oppose political correctness.

Also, this may be another political opinion of mine (and it has nothing to do with Canada's C-16 law), but I do not find mourning Kate Steinle offensive. In fact, I find honoring her or mourning her "acceptable" (probably more acceptable than selling hacked Pokemon on this site).
 
Can you please reply to my texts or at least tell me something why you don't do it? Also screw your friends, they are just a bunch of immature pre-mature kids and they don't deserve your attention more than I do -_-
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top