Twisted Girl Throws Puppies in a River

Status
Not open for further replies.
Psychonaut said:
Numner said:
I'm saying I'm tired of only the bad people getting attention.

Look at Hollywood.

Where are all the volunteers.

I'm not justifying the act, but I'm saying you're really giving her what she wants.
think before you post.

if you're saying that only bad people are getting attention, why are you giving them attention by defending her? to do/acknowledge her at all is giving her attention, which is what any "troll" is really out to get.

you're saying that hollywood is focused moreso on those who are whores, sluts, i.e. "bad influences", as compared to those who are good/volunteers?

you weren't saying that we were giving her what she wants until the last post. before, you said that you were defending her. pick a belief, bro.

and i hardly believe that posting any amount of discussion about the topic on this forum is going to reach her somehow. she got the attention that she wanted from the people who got her info/dox, and proceeded to report her, or whatever they did.

I really don't understand what your point is, or what you're trying to say, bro.

again, think before you post.

also, what rob said.
I lost what I was fighting for when the argument started.

>if you couldn't tell I restated things a lot.

But excuse the lack of morality, I just don't find it a big deal.

Even /b/ is raging from what I hear.
 
Numner said:
I lost what I was fighting for when the argument started.

>if you couldn't tell I restated things a lot.

But excuse the lack of morality, I just don't find it a big deal.

Even /b/ is raging from what I hear.
so.. what's the point in arguing/posting, at that point?

such as?

my rage isn't for/about her, it's about you having a *censored.2.0*ty argument/defense for justifying her.
 
Psychonaut said:
Numner said:
I lost what I was fighting for when the argument started.

>if you couldn't tell I restated things a lot.

But excuse the lack of morality, I just don't find it a big deal.

Even /b/ is raging from what I hear.
so.. what's the point in arguing/posting, at that point?

such as?

my rage isn't for/about her, it's about you having a *censored.2.0*ty argument/defense for justifying her.
I was never justifying her, I was giving the implication that there might be a slight possibility that nothing bad was from it.

Although I really wasn't thinking about the woohoo.
 
Numner said:
Psychonaut said:
Numner said:
I lost what I was fighting for when the argument started.

>if you couldn't tell I restated things a lot.

But excuse the lack of morality, I just don't find it a big deal.

Even /b/ is raging from what I hear.
so.. what's the point in arguing/posting, at that point?

such as?

my rage isn't for/about her, it's about you having a *censored.2.0*ty argument/defense for justifying her.
I was never justifying her, I was giving the implication that there might be a slight possibility that nothing bad was from it.

Although I really wasn't thinking about the woohoo.
you were never justifying her?

also, the word justifying slipped. just imagine that word isn't there.

i've already gone over the point that she might not know any better, and considered it moot.
 
Psychonaut said:
Numner said:
Psychonaut said:
Numner said:
I lost what I was fighting for when the argument started.

>if you couldn't tell I restated things a lot.

But excuse the lack of morality, I just don't find it a big deal.

Even /b/ is raging from what I hear.
so.. what's the point in arguing/posting, at that point?

such as?

my rage isn't for/about her, it's about you having a *censored.2.0*ty argument/defense for justifying her.
I was never justifying her, I was giving the implication that there might be a slight possibility that nothing bad was from it.

Although I really wasn't thinking about the woohoo.
you were never justifying her?

also, the word justifying slipped. just imagine that word isn't there.

i've already gone over the point that she might not know any better, and considered it moot.
She's obviously troubled to do something as bad as that.

She might be depressed/crying for attention.

What she did was obviously horrible but I don't think a sane person would do something of such horrible actions (except that asshats who dropped the dog off the bridge). Something must of set her off. Or maybe I'm being sexist. Girls just don't seem like the type to throw a box of puppies into a river for the lulz.
 
Numner said:
Psychonaut said:
Numner said:
Psychonaut said:
Quoting limited to 4 levels deep
I was never justifying her, I was giving the implication that there might be a slight possibility that nothing bad was from it.

Although I really wasn't thinking about the woohoo.
you were never justifying her?

also, the word justifying slipped. just imagine that word isn't there.

i've already gone over the point that she might not know any better, and considered it moot.
She's obviously troubled to do something as bad as that.

She might be depressed/crying for attention.

What she did was obviously horrible but I don't think a sane person would do something of such horrible actions (except that asshats who dropped the dog off the bridge). Something must of set her off. Or maybe I'm being sexist. Girls just don't seem like the type to throw a box of puppies into a river for the lulz.
People can be twisted, regardless of gender.

Also, not being of sound mind is not a valid excuse, people that go around killing things for fun like this girl did are obviously troubled.

That said, I don't have any interest in continuing this, so I'll leave it be from here on out.
 
Muffun said:
SHE IS THE NEW QUEEN OF /B/. She did all of it for the lulz.


But it was only lulzy for her, and (possibly) the camera (wo)man.




...and Peter.
4chan hates her, and Boxxxy <3
 
Numner said:
Psychonaut said:
Numner said:
Psychonaut said:
Quoting limited to 4 levels deep
I was never justifying her, I was giving the implication that there might be a slight possibility that nothing bad was from it.

Although I really wasn't thinking about the woohoo.
you were never justifying her?

also, the word justifying slipped. just imagine that word isn't there.

i've already gone over the point that she might not know any better, and considered it moot.
She's obviously troubled to do something as bad as that.

She might be depressed/crying for attention.

What she did was obviously horrible but I don't think a sane person would do something of such horrible actions (except that asshats who dropped the dog off the bridge). Something must of set her off. Or maybe I'm being sexist. Girls just don't seem like the type to throw a box of puppies into a river for the lulz.
you already said that she didn't know any better/was raised this way.. you're really confusing me as to what you're trying to say/how you're trying to defend/stand up for her.

I really don't see how you're replying to me so much as just trying to come up with new things by saying the same thing as last post. cool theory.

also, on the topic of 4chan hating her, i hate to believe that moralfags have really made any of the chan's an internet compassion machine.

used to be anonymouse would have lulz'd at that, and enshrined her. but oh well, god damn hippies learning of 4chin.
 
Muffun said:
SHE IS THE NEW QUEEN OF /B/. She did all of it for the lulz.


But it was only lulzy for her, and (possibly) the camera (wo)man.




...and Peter.
No..

Lets find her and throw rocks at her!!! :D
 
what an ass wipe. how would she like to be thrown into a river as a baby? this is disgusting.
 
Just an update on this...

For anyone that didn't know, 5 of the 6 puppies were apparently saved by an old lady, but it now turns out that is false:
http://news.ninemsn.com.au/world/7957415/elderly-woman-didnt-save-puppies-from-river-villagers

The article states:
Photographs published on Monday show Pavlovic holding a litter of puppies in her arms - but the animals are brown and black while the ones in the video are black and white.
"The old lady is next door neighbour of the girl's family ... [my source said] they made a deal to make up that rescue story to 'save' the girl," Vujadinovic said.

Vujadinovic said she found her source by calling bars and other villagers in the area until she found someone who would talk to her.

"[The girl] can hardly bear to live with the reactions and everyone believes Pavlovic made this up only to try to help the girl and her family," the source was quoted as saying.

The man would only speak on the condition his identity was not revealed.

It's a shame that the girl lives in Bosnia really, considering what the laws of the country are:
Vujadinovic said locals were protective of the girl and did not understand the media attention because they live in a region where stray cats and dogs are regularly killed.

"On many internet pages you find lot of comments like, 'what is all that fuss about a few dogs?'," Vujadinovic said.

Bosnian police have tracked down the girl in the video but it is not yet clear if she has been charged.

Under Bosnian law a person who kills or tortures animals is punishable with fines ranging from $6900 to $16,000.
 
David said:
what an ass wipe. how would she like to be thrown into a river as a baby? this is disgusting.
Aw David dissapointed me..
I was waiting for him to say something like "This video is terrible quality! And the sound sucks!"
 
SSgt. Garrett said:
Blue_Alain said:
SSgt. Garrett said:
Blue_Alain said:
There is another one of a chinesse girl killing a little cat:

http://catsruletheworld-meow.xanga.com/676240343/the-kitten-torturing-woman-/


I didnt find the video on facebook, lost it :/
CANNOT UNSEE!

DO NOT *censored.3.0*ING LOOK! CRYSTAL CLEAR IMAGES DO NOT LOOK!
What ? Oh yeah don't look if you have light hearth ....
: |
What did I say wrong xD ?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top