Twisted Girl Throws Puppies in a River

[The Sign Painter]

Quoting limited to 4 levels deep

i herd u liek 9001 sticky bombs at your feet OGAWD

and boxxy is my minion

HOLY *censored.2.0* I AM IMMOBILIZED

FFFFFFUUUUUUUUU

>D

 

[Psychonaut]

 

[Numner]

Even for what she did, threatening murder is pretty harsh and just as wrong. :/

She killed like 6 puppies, she deserves death if you ask me, or at the very least life in prison with no chance of bail.

6 puppies isn't really to die over.

Puppies are just cute, you(or others) eat animals everyday, they're just not really cute animals.

But I guess there is at least a reason for those, and not some cry for attention.

Speaking of crying for attention, this girl has successfully pissed off most of the world.

gb2/countries that eat dogs/other domesticated animals.

stop being an anti-hippie, hippie.

she took 6 lives, be it dog, cat, human, cow, chicken. she took them for no good reason, or at very least no given/apparent reason. if she was eating them because she was starving would be different than just throwing their lives away.

she was enjoying herself, and wanted to gloat about it by posting the video.

and then i lose my train of thought.

Well maybe she was ignorant of the wrong doing.

Maybe it was like playing baseball.

Or maybe they didn't have the money to keep all the puppies; she had to of got them from somewhere, maybe they already have a dog. Maybe she was saving them from worse torture.

 

[The Sign Painter]

Oh, and I feel for some reason this isn't real.

 

[Psychonaut]

Quoting limited to 4 levels deep

6 puppies isn't really to die over.

Puppies are just cute, you(or others) eat animals everyday, they're just not really cute animals.

But I guess there is at least a reason for those, and not some cry for attention.

Speaking of crying for attention, this girl has successfully pissed off most of the world.

gb2/countries that eat dogs/other domesticated animals.

stop being an anti-hippie, hippie.

she took 6 lives, be it dog, cat, human, cow, chicken. she took them for no good reason, or at very least no given/apparent reason. if she was eating them because she was starving would be different than just throwing their lives away.

she was enjoying herself, and wanted to gloat about it by posting the video.

and then i lose my train of thought.

Well maybe she was ignorant of the wrong doing.

Maybe it was like playing baseball.

Or maybe they didn't have the money to keep all the puppies; she had to of got them from somewhere, maybe they already have a dog. Maybe she was saving them from worse torture.

at that age, i think she would be acting of her own free will.
but as I've said in another post, there was no reason given.

what would be like playing baseball? how does baseball compare to this? (curious)

if this is so, why did she film it, much less upload that video onto the internet?

@ farren, I did too, but I think the first two or three were kicking/moving their legs around. past three or four, they all looked to be already dead/lifeless/asleep

edit: it was the second one. it twitched/moved an awful lot. and the last one might have been waking up. i dunno.

 

[The Sign Painter]

Quoting limited to 4 levels deep

gb2/countries that eat dogs/other domesticated animals.

stop being an anti-hippie, hippie.

she took 6 lives, be it dog, cat, human, cow, chicken. she took them for no good reason, or at very least no given/apparent reason. if she was eating them because she was starving would be different than just throwing their lives away.

she was enjoying herself, and wanted to gloat about it by posting the video.

and then i lose my train of thought.

Well maybe she was ignorant of the wrong doing.

Maybe it was like playing baseball.

Or maybe they didn't have the money to keep all the puppies; she had to of got them from somewhere, maybe they already have a dog. Maybe she was saving them from worse torture.

at that age, i think she would be acting of her own free will.
but as I've said in another post, there was no reason given.

what would be like playing baseball? how does baseball compare to this? (curious)

if this is so, why did she film it, much less upload that video onto the internet?

@ farren, I did too, but I think the first two or three were kicking/moving their legs around. past three or four, they all looked to be already dead/lifeless/asleep

edit: it was the second one. it twitched/moved an awful lot. and the last one might have been waking up. i dunno.

I rewatched it, 2nd or 3rd was the only one to actually move.
but anyways, squeals could be made using editor, and perhaps there was something wrong with them
or someone was waiting down the river to get them so she could be internet famous

 

[Numner]

Quoting limited to 4 levels deep

gb2/countries that eat dogs/other domesticated animals.

stop being an anti-hippie, hippie.

she took 6 lives, be it dog, cat, human, cow, chicken. she took them for no good reason, or at very least no given/apparent reason. if she was eating them because she was starving would be different than just throwing their lives away.

she was enjoying herself, and wanted to gloat about it by posting the video.

and then i lose my train of thought.

Well maybe she was ignorant of the wrong doing.

Maybe it was like playing baseball.

Or maybe they didn't have the money to keep all the puppies; she had to of got them from somewhere, maybe they already have a dog. Maybe she was saving them from worse torture.

at that age, i think she would be acting of her own free will.
but as I've said in another post, there was no reason given.

what would be like playing baseball? how does baseball compare to this? (curious)

if this is so, why did she film it, much less upload that video onto the internet?

@ farren, I did too, but I think the first two or three were kicking/moving their legs around. past three or four, they all looked to be already dead/lifeless/asleep

edit: it was the second one. it twitched/moved an awful lot. and the last one might have been waking up. i dunno.

I mean the whole nonchalant thing.

She seemed excited to play.

 

[Psychonaut]

Quoting limited to 4 levels deep

Well maybe she was ignorant of the wrong doing.

Maybe it was like playing baseball.

Or maybe they didn't have the money to keep all the puppies; she had to of got them from somewhere, maybe they already have a dog. Maybe she was saving them from worse torture.

at that age, i think she would be acting of her own free will.
but as I've said in another post, there was no reason given.

what would be like playing baseball? how does baseball compare to this? (curious)

if this is so, why did she film it, much less upload that video onto the internet?

@ farren, I did too, but I think the first two or three were kicking/moving their legs around. past three or four, they all looked to be already dead/lifeless/asleep

edit: it was the second one. it twitched/moved an awful lot. and the last one might have been waking up. i dunno.

I rewatched it, 2nd or 3rd was the only one to actually move.
but anyways, squeals could be made using editor, and perhaps there was something wrong with them
or someone was waiting down the river to get them so she could be internet famous

I considered that too, but one of them was very close to the riverside, and very high into the air.
I doubt that the puppies had/have any real bones developed fully, and as such would be injured when they hit the water, even if someone was waiting for them.

yes, an editor could have made the sounds. everyone here who knows the internet knows that. congratulations.

fifth one moves slightly, as if it's waking up. third doesn't move too much. the second is a wriggler, though.

@ numner, you could put the same situation to any form of crime, say murder, or public indecency. if a child is brought up to simply kill whomever they dislike, or to do whatever as a kind of game that's fun to play, does that make it any more right to people who weren't raised with the same beliefs?

no. and society/the majority of people do not throw puppies into the rivers for fun/as a past time, to my knowledge. your point is moot.

whether she knew/realized what she was doing or not has no bearing in this. the only thing that matters is that she did it.

 

[Numner]

Quoting limited to 4 levels deep

at that age, i think she would be acting of her own free will.
but as I've said in another post, there was no reason given.

what would be like playing baseball? how does baseball compare to this? (curious)

if this is so, why did she film it, much less upload that video onto the internet?

@ farren, I did too, but I think the first two or three were kicking/moving their legs around. past three or four, they all looked to be already dead/lifeless/asleep

edit: it was the second one. it twitched/moved an awful lot. and the last one might have been waking up. i dunno.

I rewatched it, 2nd or 3rd was the only one to actually move.
but anyways, squeals could be made using editor, and perhaps there was something wrong with them
or someone was waiting down the river to get them so she could be internet famous

I considered that too, but one of them was very close to the riverside, and very high into the air.
I doubt that the puppies had/have any real bones developed fully, and as such would be injured when they hit the water, even if someone was waiting for them.

yes, an editor could have made the sounds. everyone here who knows the internet knows that. congratulations.

fifth one moves slightly, as if it's waking up. third doesn't move too much. the second is a wriggler, though.

@ numner, you could put the same situation to any form of crime, say murder, or public indecency. if a child is brought up to simply kill whomever they dislike, or to do whatever as a kind of game that's fun to play, does that make it any more right to people who weren't raised with the same beliefs?

no. and society/the majority of people do not throw puppies into the rivers for fun/as a past time, to my knowledge. your point is moot.

whether she knew/realized what she was doing or not has no bearing in this. the only thing that matters is that she did it.

Well they didn't know any better.

Not saying that this girl isn't a developed adolescent aware of what she is doing. Even though maybe it's not considered a big deal to a lot of people there.

 

[Psychonaut]

Well they didn't know any better.

Not saying that this girl isn't a developed adolescent aware of what she is doing. Even though maybe it's not considered a big deal to a lot of people there.

wonderful rebuttal.

people there. are you a people from there? am I? is anyone living/raised there at this forum, and approving/finding nothing wrong with her?

what are you trying to say/what is your point?

 

[Rawburt]

Quoting limited to 4 levels deep

I rewatched it, 2nd or 3rd was the only one to actually move.
but anyways, squeals could be made using editor, and perhaps there was something wrong with them
or someone was waiting down the river to get them so she could be internet famous

I considered that too, but one of them was very close to the riverside, and very high into the air.
I doubt that the puppies had/have any real bones developed fully, and as such would be injured when they hit the water, even if someone was waiting for them.

yes, an editor could have made the sounds. everyone here who knows the internet knows that. congratulations.

fifth one moves slightly, as if it's waking up. third doesn't move too much. the second is a wriggler, though.

@ numner, you could put the same situation to any form of crime, say murder, or public indecency. if a child is brought up to simply kill whomever they dislike, or to do whatever as a kind of game that's fun to play, does that make it any more right to people who weren't raised with the same beliefs?

no. and society/the majority of people do not throw puppies into the rivers for fun/as a past time, to my knowledge. your point is moot.

whether she knew/realized what she was doing or not has no bearing in this. the only thing that matters is that she did it.

Well they didn't know any better.

Not saying that this girl isn't a developed adolescent aware of what she is doing. Even though maybe it's not considered a big deal to a lot of people there.

What is the point you're trying to make?

 

[Numner]

Quoting limited to 4 levels deep

I considered that too, but one of them was very close to the riverside, and very high into the air.
I doubt that the puppies had/have any real bones developed fully, and as such would be injured when they hit the water, even if someone was waiting for them.

yes, an editor could have made the sounds. everyone here who knows the internet knows that. congratulations.

fifth one moves slightly, as if it's waking up. third doesn't move too much. the second is a wriggler, though.

@ numner, you could put the same situation to any form of crime, say murder, or public indecency. if a child is brought up to simply kill whomever they dislike, or to do whatever as a kind of game that's fun to play, does that make it any more right to people who weren't raised with the same beliefs?

no. and society/the majority of people do not throw puppies into the rivers for fun/as a past time, to my knowledge. your point is moot.

whether she knew/realized what she was doing or not has no bearing in this. the only thing that matters is that she did it.

Well they didn't know any better.

Not saying that this girl isn't a developed adolescent aware of what she is doing. Even though maybe it's not considered a big deal to a lot of people there.

What is the point you're trying to make?

I'm just trying to stand up for her from everyone *****ing out saying they're going to kill her.

 

[Rawburt]

Quoting limited to 4 levels deep

Well they didn't know any better.

Not saying that this girl isn't a developed adolescent aware of what she is doing. Even though maybe it's not considered a big deal to a lot of people there.

What is the point you're trying to make?

I'm just trying to stand up for her from everyone *****ing out saying they're going to kill her.

Well, they're not, they're just expressing anger/disgust.

I will admit that saying they'll kill her is dumb.

 

[Psychonaut]

I'm just trying to stand up for her from everyone *****ing out saying they're going to kill her.

I'm sure she'll thank you. /sarcasm

that's your call, I guess, but i don't really see what ground you have to stand on, if you want to defend her.

like i said, your point is moot, unless you're saying that the same situation would be perfectly fine for any other crime, in which case, congratulations.

 

[Numner]

I'm just trying to stand up for her from everyone *****ing out saying they're going to kill her.

I'm sure she'll thank you. /sarcasm

that's your call, I guess, but i don't really see what ground you have to stand on, if you want to defend her.

like i said, your point is moot, unless you're saying that the same situation would be perfectly fine for any other crime, in which case, congratulations.

She seems like a teenager in a bad position crying out for attention.

And then the internet gave it to her.

Troll successful.

 

[Rawburt]

I'm just trying to stand up for her from everyone *****ing out saying they're going to kill her.

I'm sure she'll thank you. /sarcasm

that's your call, I guess, but i don't really see what ground you have to stand on, if you want to defend her.

like i said, your point is moot, unless you're saying that the same situation would be perfectly fine for any other crime, in which case, congratulations.

She seems like a teenager in a bad position crying out for attention.

And then the internet gave it to her.

Troll successful.

So, how does that make this act justifiable?

 

[Psychonaut]

She seems like a teenager in a bad position crying out for attention.

And then the internet gave it to her.

Troll successful.

she seems like a piece of *censored.2.0*.

<div class='spoiler_toggle'>protip</div><div class="spoiler" style="display:none;">not everyone on the internet is a troll.</div>

i love how you have nothing else to say/counter with, other than that she's a troll.

 

[Numner]

She seems like a teenager in a bad position crying out for attention.

And then the internet gave it to her.

Troll successful.

she seems like a piece of *censored.2.0*.

<div class='spoiler_toggle'>protip</div><div class="spoiler" style="display:none;">not everyone on the internet is a troll.</div>

i love how you have nothing else to say/counter with, other than that she's a troll.

I'm saying I'm tired of only the bad people getting attention.

Look at Hollywood.

Where are all the volunteers.

I'm not justifying the act, but I'm saying you're really giving her what she wants.

 

[Rawburt]

She seems like a teenager in a bad position crying out for attention.

And then the internet gave it to her.

Troll successful.

she seems like a piece of *censored.2.0*.

<div class='spoiler_toggle'>protip</div><div class="spoiler" style="display:none;">not everyone on the internet is a troll.</div>

i love how you have nothing else to say/counter with, other than that she's a troll.

I'm saying I'm tired of only the bad people getting attention.

Look at Hollywood.

Where are all the volunteers.

I'm not justifying the act, but I'm saying you're really giving her what she wants.

You should stop paying attention to the media then, people eat bad people up.

Find the good in people in real life.

 

[Psychonaut]

I'm saying I'm tired of only the bad people getting attention.

Look at Hollywood.

Where are all the volunteers.

I'm not justifying the act, but I'm saying you're really giving her what she wants.

think before you post.

if you're saying that only bad people are getting attention, why are you giving them attention by defending her? to do/acknowledge her at all is giving her attention, which is what any "troll" is really out to get.

you're saying that hollywood is focused moreso on those who are whores, sluts, i.e. "bad influences", as compared to those who are good/volunteers?

you weren't saying that we were giving her what she wants until the last post. before, you said that you were defending her. pick a belief, bro.

and i hardly believe that posting any amount of discussion about the topic on this forum is going to reach her somehow. she got the attention that she wanted from the people who got her info/dox, and proceeded to report her, or whatever they did.

I really don't understand what your point is, or what you're trying to say, bro.

again, think before you post.

also, what rob said.