This pisses me off

[Jas0n]

^nuff said.

 

[Cottonball]

This is why Kelsi hates war.

 

[Psychonaut]

note: the world

but yeah, war happens and is hella expensive.

 

[Pear]

That's depressing, but not unsurprisingly true.

 

[Mr. L]

Just goes to show you that the government is filled with a bunch of *censored.1.3*s and retards.

 

[Deleted User]

Just goes to show you that the government is filled with a bunch of *censored.1.3*s and retards.

Just goes to show how ignorant you kids are now days.

 

[AndyB]

Just goes to show you that the government is filled with a bunch of *censored.1.3*s and retards.

Just like tbt then eh?

/thread War... what is it good for?

 

[Mr. L]

Just goes to show you that the government is filled with a bunch of *censored.1.3*s and retards.

Just goes to show how ignorant you kids are now days.

Yeah, and you really act like a 17 year old. Grow the *censored.3.0* up.

 

[Deleted User]

Just goes to show you that the government is filled with a bunch of *censored.1.3*s and retards.

Just goes to show how ignorant you kids are now days.

Yeah, and you really act like a 17 year old. Grow the *censored.3.0* up.

Someone butthurt?

 

[Mr. L]

Just goes to show you that the government is filled with a bunch of *censored.1.3*s and retards.

Just goes to show how ignorant you kids are now days.

Yeah, and you really act like a 17 year old. Grow the *censored.3.0* up.

Someone butthurt?

Someone not acting his/her age?

 

[Deleted User]

Quoting limited to 4 levels deep

Yeah, and you really act like a 17 year old. Grow the *censored.3.0* up.

Someone butthurt?

Someone not acting his/her age?

Please go back to your mommy, little boy.

 

[Psychonaut]

sure is war debate in here

 

[Lisathegreat!]

Wow, I never knew that.

 

[Deleted User]

I think that we should continue doing nothing for world hunger. I don't mean to sound harsh or anything, but it's really the survival of the fittest. If we provide poor countries with food, they will survive longer, increasing their population, and that means we'll just have to continue sending more and more food every year. Eventually it'll get out of control.

 

[Pear]

I think that we should continue doing nothing for world hunger. I don't mean to sound harsh or anything, but it's really the survival of the fittest. If we provide poor countries with food, they will survive longer, increasing their population, and that means we'll just have to continue sending more and more food every year. Eventually it'll get out of control.

Or help them create sustainable food supplies, while providing humanitarian aid until that time.

 

[Garrett x50 cal]

I think that we should continue doing nothing for world hunger. I don't mean to sound harsh or anything, but it's really the survival of the fittest. If we provide poor countries with food, they will survive longer, increasing their population, and that means we'll just have to continue sending more and more food every year. Eventually it'll get out of control.

They're like squirrels feed em and they'll bring back their kid then you got a whole *censored.3.0*ing army of squirrels wanting some peanut butter on crackers.

/kidding.

 

[Deleted User]

I think that we should continue doing nothing for world hunger. I don't mean to sound harsh or anything, but it's really the survival of the fittest. If we provide poor countries with food, they will survive longer, increasing their population, and that means we'll just have to continue sending more and more food every year. Eventually it'll get out of control.

Or help them create sustainable food supplies, while providing humanitarian aid until that time.

That might be possible at first, but the world will be overpopulated very soon. When we get 15 billion + people on the planet, resources are going to dry up fast, causing even more conflict and destruction.

 

[Lisathegreat!]

I think that we should continue doing nothing for world hunger. I don't mean to sound harsh or anything, but it's really the survival of the fittest. If we provide poor countries with food, they will survive longer, increasing their population, and that means we'll just have to continue sending more and more food every year. Eventually it'll get out of control.

That's why we should be helpful and actually take our time and care. Have you ever thought about the lifes people can be missing out on? If you lived in a poor country, starving, wouldn't you want help? I know you might think it's not a big deal, but come on. It's people's lifes we're talking about, most of us waste food anyways. I wish I can do something, but I have no idea, I'm still very young >_<

 

[Mr. L]

Quoting limited to 4 levels deep

Someone butthurt?

Someone not acting his/her age?

Please go back to your mommy, little boy.

You're just proving my point onward, ahuehuehue.

 

[Deleted User]

I think that we should continue doing nothing for world hunger. I don't mean to sound harsh or anything, but it's really the survival of the fittest. If we provide poor countries with food, they will survive longer, increasing their population, and that means we'll just have to continue sending more and more food every year. Eventually it'll get out of control.

That's why we should be helpful and actually take our time and care. Have you ever thought about the lifes people can be missing out on? If you lived in a poor country, starving, wouldn't you want help? I know you might think it's not a big deal, but come on. It's people's lifes we're talking about, most of us waste food anyways. I wish I can do something, but I have no idea, I'm still very young >_<

I would be all for helping out people that are starving if the Earth was bigger and had unlimited resources, but that sadly isn't the case. If we helped out other countries by using more resources, (not just money), to produce food, we would be speeding up the process of Earth's demise. That is unless astronomers ever find a hospitable planet besides Earth.