Awful.
- - - Post Merge - - -
Or at least awful was putting it lightly... but it's really just a huge threat to lower income folks in terms of health, it makes the rich richer, it makes paying off student loan debts even more difficult and could make graduate studies accessible only to the very wealthy students, it favors big businesses who have corporate tax cuts(and this WON'T lead to more employment options, despite GOP claims...), it discourages any sort of homeownership for folks in the middle class(which is a tactic to make rich people richer), it's gonna repeal all of the local tax deductions which will effectively penalize people who live in states where the taxes are higher(and therefore states that tend to have more social safety nets and progressive voters), and the best part of all is how it’s predicted it'll have a horrible effect on nonprofits and charity organizations(meaning we're gonna have a drop in quality for services people are in need of.)
This is all just the beginning too, but what this all is promoting is just more political corruption... Like, repealing the whole Johnson Amendment has consequences, as I even quote:
For those who aren't familiar with the Johnson Amendment, its current job is to prevent churches and other tax-exempt organizations from organizing politically, endorsing political candidates, and so on. What repealing it would do is throw separation of church and state out the window… not to mention that it would give evangelical churches and televangelist organizations much more power, driving the country further to a sort of evangelical hierarchy. So much for freedom of religion, right fellas? (Then again, I'd argue that wasn't preached very often anyways in this country, but that's a different topic for a different day.)
That's not all, though. There's also a plan to grant personhood to unborn fetuses, and here's a quote:
Those of you who're familiar with me know I don't favor that sort of crap at all, and that's a completely moronic idea to push and agree on. Like, can you believe they still managed to put something anti-choice in a freakin' tax bill?
But yeah, as I was sayin'... awful is putting it lightly. This is some real bull.
- - - Post Merge - - -
Or at least awful was putting it lightly... but it's really just a huge threat to lower income folks in terms of health, it makes the rich richer, it makes paying off student loan debts even more difficult and could make graduate studies accessible only to the very wealthy students, it favors big businesses who have corporate tax cuts(and this WON'T lead to more employment options, despite GOP claims...), it discourages any sort of homeownership for folks in the middle class(which is a tactic to make rich people richer), it's gonna repeal all of the local tax deductions which will effectively penalize people who live in states where the taxes are higher(and therefore states that tend to have more social safety nets and progressive voters), and the best part of all is how it’s predicted it'll have a horrible effect on nonprofits and charity organizations(meaning we're gonna have a drop in quality for services people are in need of.)
This is all just the beginning too, but what this all is promoting is just more political corruption... Like, repealing the whole Johnson Amendment has consequences, as I even quote:
[Doing so will] dramatically increase untraceable political spending and lead to the creation of 'sham churches' to take advantage of the new avenue for political spending, which — unlike donations to candidates, msuper PACs' and party committees — would allow donors to deduct contributions."[x]
For those who aren't familiar with the Johnson Amendment, its current job is to prevent churches and other tax-exempt organizations from organizing politically, endorsing political candidates, and so on. What repealing it would do is throw separation of church and state out the window… not to mention that it would give evangelical churches and televangelist organizations much more power, driving the country further to a sort of evangelical hierarchy. So much for freedom of religion, right fellas? (Then again, I'd argue that wasn't preached very often anyways in this country, but that's a different topic for a different day.)
That's not all, though. There's also a plan to grant personhood to unborn fetuses, and here's a quote:
The language is contained in an innocuous provision related to education savings vehicles — so-called 529 plans, which are state-sponsored, tax-free investment funds that allow families to put aside money for a child’s college education. The provision explicitly allows expectant parents to designate a “child in utero” as a beneficiary of a 529 plan.
Parents have long been able to set up 529 accounts for an unborn child, but the provision accomplishes what anti-abortion activists have long sought: It enshrines into federal law the recognition of the unborn.
Those of you who're familiar with me know I don't favor that sort of crap at all, and that's a completely moronic idea to push and agree on. Like, can you believe they still managed to put something anti-choice in a freakin' tax bill?
But yeah, as I was sayin'... awful is putting it lightly. This is some real bull.
Last edited: