^^^DarthGohan1 said:A lot of the mods were much more active when they were modded. When I became a mod I posted a lot almost every day. But over time you know less and less people on the forum, there are less and less interesting topics, etc. But that does not mean a mod that doesn't post a lot is not doing their job. A lot of what the staff does is "behind the scenes". So if the staff did their job perfectly (all spam, bots, etc. gone in a second) you'd never know the staff was doing their job so well. But the forum notices every single time a mod is not on and a spam/troll thread is around for half an hour or an hour.Pally said:There are some mods who are just fine. But there are a lot of inactive mods who have like even barely made a post this year. I don't see what the point is of them being mod then.
Also, I'm not saying the most active members should be mod. No the ones who are fit for the job.
Derp.
As for adding more staff... it's always something on at least part of the staff's minds. But more staff can't be added all the time... because a staff too big is just as bad or even worse than one too small. When the right person comes along they become a mod... but there is rarely a rush to make this happen.
Think EAC.