
Considering how one is a mole and therefore a mammal and the other is a spotted garden eel and therefore a fish, I don’t think what you said makes sense; you basically just pointed out divergent evolution, which is not the case here.All I can think of now is that Diglett and Wiglett must have some common ancestors that eventually split off two ways and evolved into two different species.
I think it’s more like a species mimicry example. Several plants look like bugs and there are bugs that mimic plants.Considering how one is a mole and therefore a mammal and the other is a spotted garden eel and therefore a fish, I don’t think what you said makes sense; you basically just pointed out divergent evolution, which is not the case here.
You do make a good point with what you have said (and BTF fam, please don’t post any spoilers regarding Wiglett), but keep in mind that Generation I was the first generation and that there were limits and flaws to what Game Freak could do back then. Sure, a bunch of this regarding that generation pale in comparison to later generations, but improvements came to be since and the start isn’t expected to be too great.I like the idea of convergent evolution I'm seeing involving Diglett and Wiglett, it opens up a whole new doorway of possibility to Pokémon lore and maybe even some other mons will go through something similar, but I'm also conflicted because the first ever garden eel Pokémon could have also been its own design and backstory and not just a looooong boi Diglett in a coat of white lol come on Game Freak, quit falling back on Gen 1 Pokémon designs. If Wiglett's evolution just ends up being a trio of them stuck together - Wigtrio - then yeah...........no thanks. Gen 1's thing was about genetics (the Eevee squad) and mutations/freaky multiple heads, examples being Weezing, Dodrio, Magneton. Gen 1 also just has some weak final evolutions in general: Electrode, Muk and Poliwrath just being big versions of their previous forms.
Species/biology mimicry is definitely a thing in real life, and it's no stranger to the world of Pokémon. Look at Sudowoodo and Lurantis and even Stunfisk.
I'm aware, totally. I don't fault GF for being so limited back in the Game Boy days. There a bunch of mons I love introduced in Gen 1 compared to mons I don't like as much, but don't necessarily hate on neither. I much prefer Muk over Weezing in terms of battle use, but can appreciate the Koffing line being a play on words. Funnily enough, GF does continue this mutation trend to some extent, perfect example being the Deino line lol and it's one of my fave Gen 5 monsters.You do make a good point with what you have said (and BTF fam, please don’t post any spoiler regarding Wiglett), but keep in mind the Generation I was the first generation and that there were limits and flaws to what Game Freak could do back then. Sure, a bunch of this regarding that generation pale in comparison to later generations, but improvements came to be since and the start isn’t expected to be too great.
When do you think we'll get the reveal of the evolutions of the starters? We're two weeks out from being a month away. So we're definitely due to get more information at some point. Perhaps later this month?
We did get starter reveal the previous generation. We just got them revealed after release.Last gen we didn't get any reveals for starter evolutions so there isn't a guarantee we get anything. I personally do hope they give us at least the second evolutions.
This is the most sound argument I think I’ve ever heard lol. Thank youAlolan diglett is just diglett in a wig, but the garden eel that has no link to diglett is called wiglett?
OK Gamefreak.
Oh, we don’t even know if there’s character customization? That’s what I’m hoping for.With every trailer that comes out I keep hoping we'll get a glimpse of the fashion options, but I guess by now I should just give up on getting to wear anything besides the school uniforms...