There?s no denying that my suggestion is cruel. It?s true. But our society has gotten worse already. Criminals nowadays are more ridiculous and dangerous than they were 1,000 years ago. The reason why we?re not punishing people enough to where it will deter crime is because people are appealing to ethics more. I wouldn?t mind ditching ethics if it were to torture the most heinous criminals. Would you rather have them running free and endangering more peoples? lives, or would you rather have them suffer while the innocent have nothing endangering them?
where's your limit as far as 'mentally ill' people being locked up in asylums? does this extend to all mental illness or just the ones that the powers that be decide are dangerous? i mean, do i get a free pass because OCD isn't considered one of the more dangerous mental illnesses but my friends with BPD or bipolar should get locked away? it's a slippery slope and cruel. most people obtain diagnosis' from reaching out for help and in your scenario, you run the risk of people not reaching out for help. bad post, op.
gun control is the only answer. hell, if we're locking people up preemptively, i guess we should just do all middle aged white men who account for most murders in the country.