You trollin'. Did you even read my post?
Not trolling, just coming up with genius game ideas.
They are genius. Why else would I be the first one to come up with games like these?
You trollin'. Did you even read my post?
Not trolling, just coming up with genius game ideas.
They are genius. Why else would I be the first one to come up with games like these?
Because no one goes away from homework to play video games which contain more homework.
It's good educational video gaming.
Education and Video Games...
1) Sony and Microsoft would never make such a game, even if they tried going towards casual gamers, they'd know badly it would turn out.
2) If Nintendo did make such a game, it would be one of those $15-$20 DS (not 3DS) games that not very many people buy.
Oh, well, okay. You are a moron because you want to make a video game about dumb chores. If I wanted to do something like that, I would do that in my own damn house instead of wasting it on a virtual house. Also, you ask if people are virgins on an ANIMAL CROSSING forum. A game made for LITTLE CHILDREN.How am I a moron?
Because I come up with a game idea that you don't like?
That's a pretty lame & shallow excuse for someone being a moron.
Statistics show that if this game was made, more than 98% of the human population would buy this.
Oh, well, okay. You are a moron because you want to make a video game about dumb chores. If I wanted to do something like that, I would do that in my own damn house instead of wasting it on a virtual house. Also, you ask if people are virgins on an ANIMAL CROSSING forum. A game made for LITTLE CHILDREN.
99% would buy this game? Did your parents drop you on your head?
You must be high.Animal Crossing can be, but it's not aimed at them.
You must be high.
E means EVERYONE. Not ages 6-12 -.-Are you stupid? Early childhood gaming is for 5 year olds and younger. If it is rated Everyone, then ages 6-12 would most likely purchase that than other rated games. Also, children also buy rated T games and up if they're parents allowed them.
Do you not understand what I am saying? I'm saying that ages 6-12 would most likely purchase the game. I didn't say everyone is 6-12.E means EVERYONE. Not ages 6-12 -.-
With logic like what you're saying, I'm extremely surprised you're calling ME stupid.
Do you not understand what I am saying? I'm saying that ages 6-12 would most likely purchase the game. I didn't say everyone is 6-12.
just face it KCourtnee, this game idea is stupid.![]()
But you just said that it's not aimed for children.Really? How would YOU know kids ages 6-12 would most likely purchase it? Most people that play it are 12+. Not saying everyone is, but MOST.