Lol. New Sonic game.

[Genji]

It looks like the original but in 3D

Ohhh the memories of Sonic 2

 

[Mr. L]

We're waiting for confirmation on the new annoying-as-*censored.3.0* gimmick

This.

There is none, aside from the Wisps that are used as power-ups. But they work kinda like Super Mario Galaxy power-ups, and everyone has said that they complement the gameplay, not clash with it, like some people thought they Werehog and sword did. (Though, I didn't mind the Werehog or sword at all. I thought they were great additions to the normal Sonic gameplay. The Werehog could've used a bit of work, but it wasn't horrible. People need to stop overusing the word "gimmick". That word has practically lost all meaning now. People use it to define anything that isn't "traditional" gameplay. >_>)

Don't you even dare compare Super Mario Galaxy features to this piece of *censored.2.0*.

 

[Tyeforce]

We're waiting for confirmation on the new annoying-as-*censored.3.0* gimmick

This.

There is none, aside from the Wisps that are used as power-ups. But they work kinda like Super Mario Galaxy power-ups, and everyone has said that they complement the gameplay, not clash with it, like some people thought they Werehog and sword did. (Though, I didn't mind the Werehog or sword at all. I thought they were great additions to the normal Sonic gameplay. The Werehog could've used a bit of work, but it wasn't horrible. People need to stop overusing the word "gimmick". That word has practically lost all meaning now. People use it to define anything that isn't "traditional" gameplay. >_>)

Don't you even dare compare Super Mario Galaxy features to this piece of *censored.2.0*.

Piece of *censored.2.0*? We've seen a very short teaser that showed practically nothing, and a few screenshots and interviews that show that this game is looking to be pretty darn good. Now, I don't expect it to be at the same level of Super Mario Galaxy, but that doesn't mean that it won't be a good game (and it's certainly looking like it's going to be one), or that it won't be close to Super Mario Galaxy in terms of quality. We don't have much information on it at the moment, but the information that we do have makes this game look like it's going to be pretty good, so there's absolutely no reason to call it a "piece of *censored.2.0*".

 

[Ciaran]

Quoting limited to 4 levels deep

There is none, aside from the Wisps that are used as power-ups. But they work kinda like Super Mario Galaxy power-ups, and everyone has said that they complement the gameplay, not clash with it, like some people thought they Werehog and sword did. (Though, I didn't mind the Werehog or sword at all. I thought they were great additions to the normal Sonic gameplay. The Werehog could've used a bit of work, but it wasn't horrible. People need to stop overusing the word "gimmick". That word has practically lost all meaning now. People use it to define anything that isn't "traditional" gameplay. >_>)

Don't you even dare compare Super Mario Galaxy features to this piece of *censored.2.0*.

Piece of *censored.2.0*? We've seen a very short teaser that showed practically nothing, and a few screenshots and interviews that show that this game is looking to be pretty darn good. Now, I don't expect it to be at the same level of Super Mario Galaxy, but that doesn't mean that it won't be a good game (and it's certainly looking like it's going to be one), or that it won't be close to Super Mario Galaxy in terms of quality. We don't have much information on it at the moment, but the information that we do have makes this game look like it's going to be pretty good, so there's absolutely no reason to call it a "piece of *censored.2.0*".

You cant judge a game by whats only been released as PR...

who remembers when sonic unleashed looked good?

 

[Tyeforce]

Quoting limited to 4 levels deepanything that isn't "traditional" gameplay. >_>)

Don't you even dare compare Super Mario Galaxy features to this piece of *censored.2.0*.

Piece of *censored.2.0*? We've seen a very short teaser that showed practically nothing, and a few screenshots and interviews that show that this game is looking to be pretty darn good. Now, I don't expect it to be at the same level of Super Mario Galaxy, but that doesn't mean that it won't be a good game (and it's certainly looking like it's going to be one), or that it won't be close to Super Mario Galaxy in terms of quality. We don't have much information on it at the moment, but the information that we do have makes this game look like it's going to be pretty good, so there's absolutely no reason to call it a "piece of *censored.2.0*".

You cant judge a game by whats only been released as PR...

who remembers when sonic unleashed looked good?

Um, developer interviews and testimonies from people who have actually played the game aren't really PR. You like to use that term way too much. >_>

 

[Mr. L]

Quoting limited to 4 levels deepanything that isn't "traditional" gameplay. >_>)

Don't you even dare compare Super Mario Galaxy features to this piece of *censored.2.0*.

Piece of *censored.2.0*? We've seen a very short teaser that showed practically nothing, and a few screenshots and interviews that show that this game is looking to be pretty darn good. Now, I don't expect it to be at the same level of Super Mario Galaxy, but that doesn't mean that it won't be a good game (and it's certainly looking like it's going to be one), or that it won't be close to Super Mario Galaxy in terms of quality. We don't have much information on it at the moment, but the information that we do have makes this game look like it's going to be pretty good, so there's absolutely no reason to call it a "piece of *censored.2.0*".

You cant judge a game by whats only been released as PR...

who remembers when sonic unleashed looked good?

Yeah, I felt stupid even buying it.

 

[Ciaran]

Quoting limited to 4 levels deepanything

Piece of *censored.2.0*? We've seen a very short teaser that showed practically nothing, and a few screenshots and interviews that show that this game is looking to be pretty darn good. Now, I don't expect it to be at the same level of Super Mario Galaxy, but that doesn't mean that it won't be a good game (and it's certainly looking like it's going to be one), or that it won't be close to Super Mario Galaxy in terms of quality. We don't have much information on it at the moment, but the information that we do have makes this game look like it's going to be pretty good, so there's absolutely no reason to call it a "piece of *censored.2.0*".

You cant judge a game by whats only been released as PR...

who remembers when sonic unleashed looked good?

Um, developer interviews and testimonies from people who have actually played the game aren't really PR. You like to use that term way too much. >_>

You're right, an interview with a develo[er will be completely unbiased in the middle of the recession when they are des[erately hoping this game sells...

 

[Tyeforce]

Quoting limited to 4 levels deepanythingclose to Super Mario Galaxy in terms of quality. We don't have much information on it at the moment, but the information that we do have makes this game look like it's going to be pretty good, so there's absolutely no reason to call it a "piece of *censored.2.0*".

You cant judge a game by whats only been released as PR...

who remembers when sonic unleashed looked good?

Um, developer interviews and testimonies from people who have actually played the game aren't really PR. You like to use that term way too much. >_>

You're right, an interview with a develo[er will be completely unbiased in the middle of the recession when they are des[erately hoping this game sells...

A developer interview may not be completely free of bias, no, but it's not a PR, so don't call it such. And you gotta give them credit, because in the interviews they actually dissed some of their previous games. And what about the testimonials from people who have played the game?

 

[Ciaran]

Quoting limited to 4 levels deepanythingclose to Super Mario Galaxy in terms of quality. We don't have much information on it at the moment, but the information that we do

Um, developer interviews and testimonies from people who have actually played the game aren't really PR. You like to use that term way too much. >_>

You're right, an interview with a develo[er will be completely unbiased in the middle of the recession when they are des[erately hoping this game sells...

A developer interview may not be completely free of bias, no, but it's not a PR, so don't call it such. And you gotta give them credit, because in the interviews they actually dissed some of their previous games. And what about the testimonials from people who have played the game?

saying its better than previous products isnt marketing... riiight.

And Ive yet to read anything from people whove played it...

(and in the future dont call me out for 'selective arguing')

 

[Tyeforce]

Quoting limited to 4 levels deepanythingclose to Super Mario Galaxy in terms of quality. We don't have much information on it at the moment, but the information that we do

You're right, an interview with a develo[er will be completely unbiased in the middle of the recession when they are des[erately hoping this game sells...

A developer interview may not be completely free of bias, no, but it's not a PR, so don't call it such. And you gotta give them credit, because in the interviews they actually dissed some of their previous games. And what about the testimonials from people who have played the game?

saying its better than previous products isnt marketing... riiight.

And Ive yet to read anything from people whove played it...

(and in the future dont call me out for 'selective arguing')

Then you haven't read the Nintendo Power scans, I take it? You should. (And don't give me that crap that Nintendo Power is just being biased. Hell, they didn't even give Super Mario Galaxy 2 a perfect score! And this isn't even a Nintendo game, it's a Sega game.)

 

[Mino]

Quoting limited to 4 levels deepanythingclose to Super Mario Galaxy in terms of quality. We don't have much information on it at the moment, but the information that we do[er will be completely unbiased in the middle of the recession when they are des[erately hoping this game sells...

A developer interview may not be completely free of bias, no, but it's not a PR, so don't call it such. And you gotta give them credit, because in the interviews they actually dissed some of their previous games. And what about the testimonials from people who have played the game?

saying its better than previous products isnt marketing... riiight.

And Ive yet to read anything from people whove played it...

(and in the future dont call me out for 'selective arguing')

Then you haven't read the Nintendo Power scans, I take it? You should. (And don't give me that crap that Nintendo Power is just being biased. Hell, they didn't even give Super Mario Galaxy 2 a perfect score! And this isn't even a Nintendo game, it's a Sega game.)

Haha, that's your proof? They didn't give SMG2 a perfect score, so clearly they are objective?

No, just no. NP can never be unbiased simply because they are paid by Nintendo for what they produce.

 

[Tyeforce]

Quoting limited to 4 levels deepanythingclose to Super Mario Galaxy in terms of quality. We don't have much information on it at the moment, but the information that we do

saying its better than previous products isnt marketing... riiight.

And Ive yet to read anything from people whove played it...

(and in the future dont call me out for 'selective arguing')

Then you haven't read the Nintendo Power scans, I take it? You should. (And don't give me that crap that Nintendo Power is just being biased. Hell, they didn't even give Super Mario Galaxy 2 a perfect score! And this isn't even a Nintendo game, it's a Sega game.)

Haha, that's your proof? They didn't give SMG2 a perfect score, so clearly they are objective?

No, just no. NP can never be unbiased simply because they are paid by Nintendo for what they produce.

It's not the fact that they didn't give it a perfect score, it's the fact that they didn't, while other magazines and websites (even ones known to be biased against Nintendo) did. And Nintendo Power isn't even made by Nintendo anymore. I won't say that they're completely unbiased, because virtually every reviewer is biased in some way, but they're not just ignorant fanboys. Nintendo Power deals only with Nintendo games, but that certainly doesn't mean that they praise every single Nintendo game just because, or that they bash games on other systems, because that's not the case. They're fair, but they just deal exclusively with Nintendo games. Kinda like me. Of course, I don't expect you to believe that, since you can't even believe the truth about me.

 

[Mino]

Quoting limited to 4 levels deepanythingclose to Super Mario Galaxy in terms of quality. We don't have much information on it at the moment, but the information that we do

Then you haven't read the Nintendo Power scans, I take it? You should. (And don't give me that crap that Nintendo Power is just being biased. Hell, they didn't even give Super Mario Galaxy 2 a perfect score! And this isn't even a Nintendo game, it's a Sega game.)

Haha, that's your proof? They didn't give SMG2 a perfect score, so clearly they are objective?

No, just no. NP can never be unbiased simply because they are paid by Nintendo for what they produce.

It's not the fact that they didn't give it a perfect score, it's the fact that they didn't, while other magazines and websites (even ones known to be biased against Nintendo) did. And Nintendo Power isn't even made by Nintendo anymore. I won't say that they're completely unbiased, because virtually every reviewer is biased in some way, but they're not just ignorant fanboys. Nintendo Power deals only with Nintendo games, but that certainly doesn't mean that they praise every single Nintendo game just because, or that they bash games on other systems, because that's not the case. They're fair, but they just deal exclusively with Nintendo games. Kinda like me. Of course, I don't expect you to believe that, since you can't even believe the truth about me.

Plenty of websites didn't give it a high score, too. You're still out of your *censored.3.0*ing mind if you think that that provides even a shred of credibility to Nintendo Power. Also, I just checked what score they actually did give, turns out it was a 9http://www.youtube.com/v/g_u3TyOACRk&autoplay=15. Seriously, that argument is simply idiotic.

And Nintendo Power is still on the payroll of Nintendo, exclusively. True its no longer produced in-house at Nintendo of America, but the fact is is that its only real purpose is as an advertising tool for Nintendo. You don't need to tell me that they deal only with Nintendo, I'm well-aware of that fact.

Also, your arguments would be a lot more convincing if you didn't have to insert some sort of whiny cry for pity in every post you make.

 

[Ciaran]

Quoting limited to 4 levels deepanythingclose to Super Mario Galaxy in terms of quality. We don't have much information on it at the moment, but the information that we do

Haha, that's your proof? They didn't give SMG2 a perfect score, so clearly they are objective?

No, just no. NP can never be unbiased simply because they are paid by Nintendo for what they produce.

It's not the fact that they didn't give it a perfect score, it's the fact that they didn't, while other magazines and websites (even ones known to be biased against Nintendo) did. And Nintendo Power isn't even made by Nintendo anymore. I won't say that they're completely unbiased, because virtually every reviewer is biased in some way, but they're not just ignorant fanboys. Nintendo Power deals only with Nintendo games, but that certainly doesn't mean that they praise every single Nintendo game just because, or that they bash games on other systems, because that's not the case. They're fair, but they just deal exclusively with Nintendo games. Kinda like me. Of course, I don't expect you to believe that, since you can't even believe the truth about me.

Plenty of websites didn't give it a high score, too. You're still out of your *censored.3.0*ing mind if you think that that provides even a shred of credibility to Nintendo Power. Also, I just checked what score they actually did give, turns out it was a 9http://www.youtube.com/v/g_u3TyOACRk&autoplay=15. Seriously, that argument is simply idiotic.

And Nintendo Power is still on the payroll of Nintendo, exclusively. True its no longer produced in-house at Nintendo of America, but the fact is is that its only real purpose is as an advertising tool for Nintendo. You don't need to tell me that they deal only with Nintendo, I'm well-aware of that fact.

Also, your arguments would be a lot more convincing if you didn't have to insert some sort of whiny cry for pity in every post you make.

IF ONLY HE COULD EDIT HIS ARGUEMENTS WITH A MACBOOK PRO!!!

 

[Princess]

Aaahhhh! Stop talking tye!! D:

 

[Princess]

Quoting limited to 4 levels deepanythingclose to Super Mario Galaxy in terms of quality. We don't have much information on it at the moment, but the information that we do

It's not the fact that they didn't give it a perfect score, it's the fact that they didn't, while other magazines and websites (even ones known to be biased against Nintendo) did. And Nintendo Power isn't even made by Nintendo anymore. I won't say that they're completely unbiased, because virtually every reviewer is biased in some way, but they're not just ignorant fanboys. Nintendo Power deals only with Nintendo games, but that certainly doesn't mean that they praise every single Nintendo game just because, or that they bash games on other systems, because that's not the case. They're fair, but they just deal exclusively with Nintendo games. Kinda like me. Of course, I don't expect you to believe that, since you can't even believe the truth about me.

Plenty of websites didn't give it a high score, too. You're still out of your *censored.3.0*ing mind if you think that that provides even a shred of credibility to Nintendo Power. Also, I just checked what score they actually did give, turns out it was a 9http://www.youtube.com/v/g_u3TyOACRk&autoplay=15. Seriously, that argument is simply idiotic.

And Nintendo Power is still on the payroll of Nintendo, exclusively. True its no longer produced in-house at Nintendo of America, but the fact is is that its only real purpose is as an advertising tool for Nintendo. You don't need to tell me that they deal only with Nintendo, I'm well-aware of that fact.

Also, your arguments would be a lot more convincing if you didn't have to insert some sort of whiny cry for pity in every post you make.

IF ONLY HE COULD EDIT HIS ARGUEMENTS WITH A MACBOOK PRO!!!

But he has windows! 8D

 

[Rawburt]

Aaahhhh! Stop talking tye!! D:

Dat voice is hawt though.

 

[Numner]

Quoting limited to 4 levels deepanythingclose to Super Mario Galaxy in terms of quality. We don't have much information on it at the moment, but the information that we do

Plenty of websites didn't give it a high score, too. You're still out of your *censored.3.0*ing mind if you think that that provides even a shred of credibility to Nintendo Power. Also, I just checked what score they actually did give, turns out it was a 9http://www.youtube.com/v/g_u3TyOACRk&autoplay=15. Seriously, that argument is simply idiotic.

And Nintendo Power is still on the payroll of Nintendo, exclusively. True its no longer produced in-house at Nintendo of America, but the fact is is that its only real purpose is as an advertising tool for Nintendo. You don't need to tell me that they deal only with Nintendo, I'm well-aware of that fact.

Also, your arguments would be a lot more convincing if you didn't have to insert some sort of whiny cry for pity in every post you make.

IF ONLY HE COULD EDIT HIS ARGUEMENTS WITH A MACBOOK PRO!!!

But he has windows! 8D

When did this become a sudden joke.

 

[Ciaran]

http://www.youtube.com/v/g_u3TyOACRk&autoplay=1
I think sonic looks great!!

 

[Princess]

Quoting limited to 4 levels deepanythingclose to Super Mario Galaxy in terms of quality. We don't have much information on it at the moment, but the information that we dodidn't give it a high score, too. You're still out of your *censored.3.0*ing mind if you think that that provides even a shred of credibility to Nintendo Power. Also, I just checked what score they actually did give, turns out it was a 9http://www.youtube.com/v/g_u3TyOACRk&autoplay=15. Seriously, that argument is simply idiotic.

And Nintendo Power is still on the payroll of Nintendo, exclusively. True its no longer produced in-house at Nintendo of America, but the fact is is that its only real purpose is as an advertising tool for Nintendo. You don't need to tell me that they deal only with Nintendo, I'm well-aware of that fact.

Also, your arguments would be a lot more convincing if you didn't have to insert some sort of whiny cry for pity in every post you make.

IF ONLY HE COULD EDIT HIS ARGUEMENTS WITH A MACBOOK PRO!!!

But he has windows! 8D

When did this become a sudden joke.

When you quoted it for the 5th time

..