Giveaway Kiki the black cat

[SableShy]

I think her house is original. Maybe. She's still got her own catchphrase and greeting. She's wearing a really cute scarf and jacket combo pattern that I made.

If you pick her up, please don't sell or trade her. Giveaway only, okay?
Dreamie proof takes priority but is not required.

Please have room for her immediately if you want her.

 

[Jarrad]

I'd take her but I don't have room :<

bump

 

[DramasticStar]

Please!

My dream is a town of cats. ALLLL The cats.

 

[Mercedes]

Omfg me please please I'll kill to have her

 

[SableShy]

Please!

My dream is a town of cats. ALLLL The cats.

sorry!! Lucky pinch has dreamie proof so they take priority. Best of luck in your search!

 

[DramasticStar]

Thank you! I'll PM you and we can get this going.

 

[SableShy]

Omfg me please please I'll kill to have her

Dreamie proof ahoy! No problem. Lemme TT to her moving day

- - - Post Merge - - -

Thank you! I'll PM you and we can get this going.

Please don't pm me. That's how I lose all my commissions deep within the messages. Anyway best of luck in your search, I spoke a bit too soon seeing as luckypinch has dreamie proof.

 

[Malsy]

I just stumbled upon this browsing for villagers since I have a free spot. Just saying, it is incredibly rude to say someone can have something and then go back on that for something as lofty as "dreamie proof". That is not in the spirit of friendly and cooperative gameplay. You said dreamie proof not required. You said someone could have her and then went back on that. I could just as easily go change my signature all Kiki and cry about how she is my dreamie but it doesn't mean I deserve her more. This just leaves a bad taste in my mouth. It's definitely rude and unfair.

 

[SableShy]

Oh well. It's my game, my villager, and I'm giving her away for free. If I was selling or trading her I wouldn't change my mind but I specifically stated that dreamie proof takes priority. I also don't consider plain text as dreamie proof. Pictures only. There's also the fact that I know and recognize luckypinch and know they won't sell or trade her off so it's also a safer giveaway for me.

Maybe I should just void popular villagers I don't want anymore instead of giving them to someone who really wants them.

 

[daniduckyface]

Oh well. It's my game, my villager, and I'm giving her away for free. If I was selling or trading her I wouldn't change my mind but I specifically stated that dreamie proof takes priority. I also don't consider plain text as dreamie proof. Pictures only. There's also the fact that I know and recognize luckypinch and know they won't sell or trade her off so it's also a safer giveaway for me.

Maybe I should just void popular villagers I don't want anymore instead of giving them to someone who really wants them.

not trying to get involved but i agree with the other user. If you said the first poster first could have her and then go back on your words that's really not fair. If the first poster wants an all cat town as their dream town then they probably won't trade her off either.

 

[Jarrad]

I just stumbled upon this browsing for villagers since I have a free spot. Just saying, it is incredibly rude to say someone can have something and then go back on that for something as lofty as "dreamie proof". That is not in the spirit of friendly and cooperative gameplay. You said dreamie proof not required. You said someone could have her and then went back on that. I could just as easily go change my signature all Kiki and cry about how she is my dreamie but it doesn't mean I deserve her more. This just leaves a bad taste in my mouth. It's definitely rude and unfair.

No it's not? Are you forgetting that Honeygator is giving away a villager for free? She's not charging anything for it. I agree it would be a bit rude had she wanted something for Kiki, but she didn't. Personally, I'd much rather my beloved villager go to somebody with proof of wanting her/him.

Plus DramasticStar only has 6 posts... For all we know, he/she could only be wanting Kiki to then sell her off to make a profit.

I love how regardless of what happens on this website, there's always one that's sour and ungrateful.

 

[SableShy]

not trying to get involved but i agree with the other user. If you said the first poster first could have her and then go back on your words that's really not fair. If the first poster wants an all cat town as their dream town then they probably won't trade her off either.

I have no way of knowing they weren't just lying to get a popular villager to sell. It's a much safer bet to go with the person with picture proof.

I do think I may just void or sell popular villagers in the future though because this is ridiculous. It's not like I let them get all the way to my town then said "naw just kidding" or made them void a villager to make room before saying no.

 

[daniduckyface]

I have no way of knowing they weren't just lying to get a popular villager to sell. It's a much safer bet to go with the person with picture proof.

I do think I may just void or sell popular villagers in the future though because this is ridiculous. It's not like I let them get all the way to my town then said "naw just kidding" or made them void a villager to make room before saying no.

Sorry i saw how few posts the first user had and realized that you could be right. Sorry D:

- - - Post Merge - - -

plus no wifi ratings

 

[Jarrad]

not trying to get involved but i agree with the other user. If you said the first poster first could have her and then go back on your words that's really not fair. If the first poster wants an all cat town as their dream town then they probably won't trade her off either.

She changed her mind. So what?
Stop trying to make her feel bad because she wanted her villager to go to a good home. (not insinuating that the other user is a "bad home").

Anyway, it's her villager and she can do what she pleases with it. If she wants to give it to somebody over someone else then that's completely her decision to make. You literally have nothing to do with that.

 

[Punchyleaf]

OP it may be best to probably close this and just let Luckypinch know to get Kiki ^~^

 

[SableShy]

Sorry i saw how few posts the first user had and realized that you could be right. Sorry D:

- - - Post Merge - - -

plus no wifi ratings

Yeah, thanks. It's alright. Glad we worked that out.

 

[daniduckyface]

She changed her mind. So what?
Stop trying to make her feel bad because she wanted her villager to go to a good home. (not insinuating that the other user is a "bad home").

Anyway, it's her villager and she can do what she pleases with it. If she wants to give it to somebody over someone else then that's completely her decision to make. You literally have nothing to do with that.

Look i'm sorry i already apologized to the OP in another post after i looked closer at the first user when you pointed out how few posts. Please don't start something with me. I wasn't trying to make the OP feel bad. And as i look farther down they already forgave me.

 

[SableShy]

OP it may be best to probably close this and just let Luckypinch know to get Kiki ^~^

Haaaa yeah probably but it looks like they went offline and I need her out ASAP QuQ
Guess I'll hold onto her for a few hours and if they don't show up by then I'll look for someone seeking her in the mass looking for thread.