I said that you IMPLIED that immersion in drinking water =/= drinking water in video games.
We're talking about something that does the exact same thing, but has a different experience. We aren't talking about two mint conditioned consoles playing something versus a broken down console. Get our head out of your digit, because everything you're saying past "game" in the first paragraph is out of your vector. If you can't even factor in my equations you don't deserve to see the inflection point of my derivative.
Your being has no relevance. You're a square matrix without an inverse. You know what we call people like you? Non-invertible
Can't spell assuming without ass. You really need to break that habit.Tyeforce said:That comparison is obvious, and you know it's not what I meant.
We're talking about something that does the exact same thing, but has a different experience. We aren't talking about two mint conditioned consoles playing something versus a broken down console. Get our head out of your digit, because everything you're saying past "game" in the first paragraph is out of your vector. If you can't even factor in my equations you don't deserve to see the inflection point of my derivative.
A water bottle may hold water and you can drink out of it, but a dirty water bottle does the same thing. DIFFERENT EXPERIENCE.Tyeforce said:But every new Nintendo handheld feels completely different. They may play the same games, but it's a different experience.
Your being has no relevance. You're a square matrix without an inverse. You know what we call people like you? Non-invertible
