That's not true. Standardized testing is not just "you know it or you don't" for some people. Like for me, someone who takes tests on the slower side (because I'm more careful, etc.), couldn't completely finish any of the sections on the SAT (except for one). And there are tons of other things ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SAT#Criticism ) Colleges are realizing that the tests are being looked at too much and some are offering alternatives.DarthGohan1 said:I got a 32 without reading a prep book or taking a prep course or anything. You either know it or don't... a prep book won't change your score more than a point or two probably... at most.
Yeh. I'll tell you another thing about taking the SAT: Not only is there little time, there's hardly any breaks. You're going for hours without breathing...Pichubro said:If this has not been said: Don't trust tests. Pressure, environment, etc. changes everything unless if your mind and body are prepared. You could know everything and still bomb tests.
Am I not right?
I am also sort of a slow test taker. I DETEST time limits...stormcommander said:That's not true. Standardized testing is not just "you know it or you don't" for some people. Like for me, someone who takes tests on the slower side (because I'm more careful, etc.), couldn't completely finish any of the sections on the SAT (except for one). And there are tons of other things ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SAT#Criticism ) Colleges are realizing that the tests are being looked at too much and some are offering alternatives.DarthGohan1 said:I got a 32 without reading a prep book or taking a prep course or anything. You either know it or don't... a prep book won't change your score more than a point or two probably... at most.
Well on the SAT, you have 25 minutes to write an essay and they expected it to be well written... And apparently if you fill it with droning nonsense, you'll get a better score.Bulerias said:I am also sort of a slow test taker. I DETEST time limits...stormcommander said:That's not true. Standardized testing is not just "you know it or you don't" for some people. Like for me, someone who takes tests on the slower side (because I'm more careful, etc.), couldn't completely finish any of the sections on the SAT (except for one). And there are tons of other things ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SAT#Criticism ) Colleges are realizing that the tests are being looked at too much and some are offering alternatives.DarthGohan1 said:I got a 32 without reading a prep book or taking a prep course or anything. You either know it or don't... a prep book won't change your score more than a point or two probably... at most.
@ Pichu - Oh yeah, I know that. Luckily I rarely get nervous.
![]()
In 2005, MIT professor Les Perelman plotted essay length versus essay score on the new SAT from released essays and found a high correlation between them. After studying 23 graded essays he found that the longer the essay was, the higher the score. He also discovered that several of these essays were full of factual errors. However, the official SAT guide for scorers state that the essays should be scored according to their quality of writing and not factual accuracy. The National Council of Teachers of English also criticize the 25-minute writing section of the test, arguing that the basic principles of writing encourage the revision of written material several times. They say that the amount of time allowed for the test pushes schools to develop a formulaic system of writing.
Well, I'll actually be taking the ACT, where the written test is optional. But I'll do it if I still have enough time to...stormcommander said:Well on the SAT, you have 25 minutes to write an essay and they expected it to be well written... And apparently if you fill it with droning nonsense, you'll get a better score.Bulerias said:I am also sort of a slow test taker. I DETEST time limits...stormcommander said:That's not true. Standardized testing is not just "you know it or you don't" for some people. Like for me, someone who takes tests on the slower side (because I'm more careful, etc.), couldn't completely finish any of the sections on the SAT (except for one). And there are tons of other things ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SAT#Criticism ) Colleges are realizing that the tests are being looked at too much and some are offering alternatives.DarthGohan1 said:I got a 32 without reading a prep book or taking a prep course or anything. You either know it or don't... a prep book won't change your score more than a point or two probably... at most.
@ Pichu - Oh yeah, I know that. Luckily I rarely get nervous.
![]()
In 2005, MIT professor Les Perelman plotted essay length versus essay score on the new SAT from released essays and found a high correlation between them. After studying 23 graded essays he found that the longer the essay was, the higher the score. He also discovered that several of these essays were full of factual errors. However, the official SAT guide for scorers state that the essays should be scored according to their quality of writing and not factual accuracy. The National Council of Teachers of English also criticize the 25-minute writing section of the test, arguing that the basic principles of writing encourage the revision of written material several times. They say that the amount of time allowed for the test pushes schools to develop a formulaic system of writing.
Woah, when some of you guys are like "I'm fine with 29", I realize that the University Of Minnesota's standards really... aren't that high. They say I can easily be accepted into the university with an ACT score of 26... is that a low score?Sporge27 said:Ugg I am fine with my 29 overall. Honestly I di great 30 and 32 in math and science and then I think it was 25 and 27 in English and reading... I just completely zoned out a couple times staring at a single question for like 5 minutes a couple times it was awful. I should not have tried the energy drink thing, I crashed before the end of it... But that was the second try after a 27 the first time so can't complain. All you people in the 30s... *shakes fist*
I have never really been to serious about that stuff though, too much stress if I take it too serious... Much rather do worse and remain calm and collected through it
![]()
NoBulerias said:Woah, when some of you guys are like "I'm fine with 29", I realize that the University Of Minnesota's standards really... aren't that high. They say I can easily be accepted into the university with an ACT score of 26... is that a low score?Sporge27 said:Ugg I am fine with my 29 overall. Honestly I di great 30 and 32 in math and science and then I think it was 25 and 27 in English and reading... I just completely zoned out a couple times staring at a single question for like 5 minutes a couple times it was awful. I should not have tried the energy drink thing, I crashed before the end of it... But that was the second try after a 27 the first time so can't complain. All you people in the 30s... *shakes fist*
I have never really been to serious about that stuff though, too much stress if I take it too serious... Much rather do worse and remain calm and collected through it
![]()
Well, what's the "average" ACT score?stormcommander said:NoBulerias said:Woah, when some of you guys are like "I'm fine with 29", I realize that the University Of Minnesota's standards really... aren't that high. They say I can easily be accepted into the university with an ACT score of 26... is that a low score?Sporge27 said:Ugg I am fine with my 29 overall. Honestly I di great 30 and 32 in math and science and then I think it was 25 and 27 in English and reading... I just completely zoned out a couple times staring at a single question for like 5 minutes a couple times it was awful. I should not have tried the energy drink thing, I crashed before the end of it... But that was the second try after a 27 the first time so can't complain. All you people in the 30s... *shakes fist*
I have never really been to serious about that stuff though, too much stress if I take it too serious... Much rather do worse and remain calm and collected through it
![]()
So, okay, let's assume that the national average is 21... is it really that difficult to bump it up an extra 5 points? I dunno, I said I rarely got nervous about tests, but I'm sort of, I dunno... Don't mean to brag or anything, but I've always been strong in math and writing, so I'm mostly worried about the science part of it. What's the science like? I can do well in physics and biology, but "applied science" and chemistry have never been my strong suits.Sporge27 said:Too be honest I would say a 22 means you aren't doing bad but not great....
That might be a little high though.
Edit: Looking it up quickly it seems the national average is around 21, so yeah I wasn't far off in the guess I made.