Yes.. far too attached hence only one villager moving since i started Azalea in July :l
Many more will move soon though since im getting bored
In parfait, im not getting as attached, and letting villagers go tbh
This post speaks to me.
I have set my own standards. (For myself.)
No. 1: Keep in your towns those who were originally there to greet your arrival on Day #01. I blew it with Walt in Applewin. But the town's Jambette and Scoot survive. (I love them!) In my other town of Progress, Cookie, Iggly, and Apollo were there from Day #01. (It's a much newer town; but I like them as well.) And they still are. What is actually good, for me, is that they represent different category personalities. It's a smart game design.
No. 2: Represent all personality types. This helps to have a balance of the genders, as well, but it speaks to getting access from suggested Public Works Projects. I made the mistake, in Applewin, and waited too long to receive a suggestion for the Windmill. (If I recall this correctly, this comes from an Uchi. I used to have Shari, who wasn't popular but become more popular here at
The Bell Tree Forums, and she has since been replaced by Tammy.)
No. 3: Be balanced in who you have as villagers in both towns. I look at the Top Tier of
Bell Tree Forums Dreamies, and I realize it would be less interesting and less satisfying, for me, if I were to boast a lineup of nothing but Dreamies in just one town. That list does not have, among those 16 listees from Top Tier, any Jocks and Uchis. So, from my perspective, having three or four (max) in a given town may be ideal for me.
I am now in a mode of wanting to do a little reorganizing of the cast of my two towns' villagers. That's why I relate to the post I quoted by Gizmodo.