Consoles VS Emulators.

[Vex L'Cour]

I'm just postin' this out of PURE curiousity for what people like more.

Personally...I have my VBA emulator and I don't use any others. So I'd say consoles are better..

But Emulators just make games easier (What with the Accelarator and quick 'shift+F1' saving)

 

[[Nook]]

Consoles.

I can't work emulators.

 

[Chimera]

Consoles because they're legal, don't lag, have better quality, and don't require downloading.

 

[Vex L'Cour]

Consoles because they're legal, don't lag, have better quality, and don't require downloading.

I disagree that consoles don't lag > >.

 

[Chimera]

Well, certainly not nearly as much as emulators.

 

[Serk102]

Consoles because they're legal, don't lag, have better quality, and don't require downloading.

Emulators are not illegal, it's the ROMs that are illegal. Although the ROMs aren't illegal in certain circumstances.

As for my choice I'd have to pick consoles overall, although emulators offer so much more convenient.

 

[Psychonaut]

if you are a hardcore star fox fan

the answer is simple. emulators will always win, if you aren't a dummy and can set one up.

the only time you should not be using an emulator is when it's illegal, using ROMs you don't own.

but if you have a controller, say.. a ps3 or xbox 360 controller.. there really is no comparison in control, or graphics, if you have a decent computer.

 

[Jake]

Consoles.

 

[SonicPinhead]

Consoles...unless it's the Mother Series, which are impossible to get. D:

 

[Ron Ronaldo]

Consoles for sure! I love the feeling of sitting at a tv with a controller/chillin' with my DS. :3 Of course, emulators are pretty handy due to the freeness thing, but I have a hard time working them. -_-;