Tyeforce
Senior Member
It didn't completely suck, but it's very clearly a watered down version of the PS3/360 version. The developers even admitted that they just imported everything from the HD versions to the Wii version, which is why the graphics aren't so good. They should've done what they did with the DS version; build from the ground up specifically for the console, not just porting everything over from another console.Silverstorms said::OTyeforce said:It wouldn't end up sucking if it was for Wii if the developer actually cared. Most games that go multi-platform end up sucking on Wii because the developers just port a watered down PS3/360 version over to Wii *coughS&SASRcough*. But if the developer actually makes the Wii version from the ground up for Wii, it can be great. No, it won't be HD, but HD doesn't make the game.Tom said:I lol'd.Silver Dragon said:Lol. I was looking at some comments about this game on some Zelda sites. Looks like the Zelda fanboys are raging. This is one of the numerous mindless comments that I saw.
"the Wii PS3 and Xbox 360 all have exact same graphics but it still should only be for wii the game basicly sucks because it's for PS3"
One: They don't have the same graphics
Two: It'd probably end up sucking on the Wii
I like to consider myself a Zelda fanboy, but I don't rage at trivial things.
How dare you say S&SASR on the Wii sucked. I got to 19th on the Treetops timetrial leaderboards >:|