I just found The Emoji Movie on Netflix last night and for some reason I'm really tempted to watch it. I gotta see how bad someone could really make an animated movie xDDD
^^ lmao yeah idk if i would watch it for that, but yeah i can imagine it being as bad as sausage party
Sausage Party is so bad that it makes South Park's Wheel of Fortune scene look suitable for children.
As for the Emoji Movie, I read about the plot and what kind of comedy it has. Here's what comments I would say if it weren't for the emojis:
1. The plot seems to be much like the episode plots from shows like My Gym Partner's a Monkey and Squirrel Boy, two shows people my age deemed to be the worst of Cartoon Network.
2. The stupidity is only as bad as Chicken Little or the Ice Age sequels. Or it could be comparable to Dreamwork's lesser movies (like Shrek 3 or Shark Tale).
3. If it were so poorly done, it's still no match for stuff like Foodfight or Movie 43.
4. If you thought the movie was so political, Free Birds is more radical. Same with Nut Job and Nut Job 2.
But like I said before, the reason why this movie was so horrible was because they made emojis into a movie. While I don't like the idea of making emojis into a movie, others are really tearing this movie up. People even claimed that nobody asked for this movie. Another major problem in the movie is that if you want to make a movie based on stuff that aren't worth making a movie out of, it's hard to make a good plot that embraces the purpose of it. Toy Story embraces the purpose of toys, which was that toys are meant for playing with, not destroying. Not only they did a good job on making a really good movie involving toys (which embraced the purpose of toys), but they did a good job on making sequels that retained the quality of the original. The Lego Movie embraces the purpose of legos, which was that legis are meant for creativity and building, not collecting and gluing. But the Emoji Movie, it does not embrace the purpose of them.