Who wants to rate this? :D

[muffun]

Anyone wanna rate this? Please?

 

[Ron Ronaldo]

Out of ten? I'd probably give it an 7. It's pretty simple, and maybe the colors are a little similar throughout. Also, I find that maybe the words are a little small, although that's really a stylistic thing.

It's a nice siggy though, certainly better than anything I could do. ^^

 

[Pear]

Out of ten? I'd probably give it an 7. It's pretty simple, and maybe the colors are a little similar throughout. Also, I find that maybe the words are a little small, although that's really a stylistic thing.

It's a nice siggy though, certainly better than anything I could do. ^^

It looks simple on the surface, but it's not by any means. He tried to have all the colors similar so they would blend.

@Karma- I already rated on another site.

 

[muffun]

Out of ten? I'd probably give it an 7. It's pretty simple, and maybe the colors are a little similar throughout. Also, I find that maybe the words are a little small, although that's really a stylistic thing.

It's a nice siggy though, certainly better than anything I could do. ^^

It looks simple on the surface, but it's not by any means. He tried to have all the colors similar so they would blend.

Crunchy on the outside, chewy on the inside. :3

 

[Soruigi]

HMMMM...
8..... out of 9

 

[bittermeat]

The signature's simple and well put. The text is great. It needs more color, in my opinion.

 

[kalinn]

hmm..
6/10

 

[Pear]

hmm..
6/10

Wha-wha-what? How come people dislike this so much? How can Fabio's bull *censored.2.0* sigs get such great praise, and this doesn't? It's only because he was popular.
-end rant.

Not directed at you Kalinn. XD

 

[SilentHopes]

8/10 It could be better.

 

[Josh]

It looks nice but simple. I see some depth but no lighting or flow.

Although it looks nice, 6/10.

 

[Liv]

Not really my style, but 9/10 keep up the work.

 

[Dantheman500]

Hmmm.... I seem to really like it for some reason....10/10 for you!