
Its allegal to let any child under the age of 13 to post images/videos of themselves.Mickey said:Are little children ultimately permitted to even participate on YouTube? And by participate, I mean, upload content which has something about them, like maybe their whole body? Doesn't YouTube 'not' allow such content on their sites at the cost of the safety of the user in question?
LEWIS HAS SPOKEN!Lewis said:Its allegal to let any child under the age of 13 to post images/videos of themselves.Mickey said:Are little children ultimately permitted to even participate on YouTube? And by participate, I mean, upload content which has something about them, like maybe their whole body? Doesn't YouTube 'not' allow such content on their sites at the cost of the safety of the user in question?
:yay:
Illegal? I don't exactly know what 'allegal' means.Lewis said:Its allegal to let any child under the age of 13 to post images/videos of themselves.Mickey said:Are little children ultimately permitted to even participate on YouTube? And by participate, I mean, upload content which has something about them, like maybe their whole body? Doesn't YouTube 'not' allow such content on their sites at the cost of the safety of the user in question?
:yay:
bannedRockmanEXE said:I hope all these little fools get banned.
You can have one as long as you don't put yourself on it. For instance, do what I do, maker animations or music presentations or etc. I'm old enough, I'm just not allowed.Firemonkey1 said:I want to have a Youtube channel. My voice isn't really high. I doubt those kids have permission from their parents, though. I'd just post random videoes of sounds from audio tapes. And, if Youtube is "safe",then why is it banned in a few countries?
yea! Nigahiga is WAAAAY better than fred :veryhappy:Crenor402 said:yeah I just find Fred annoying! How do people pick him over Smosh or Nigahiga!?!?!?!?!?!?!?Jubstan said:How is he funny?Smarty9911 said:No, Fred is fine. He is sooo funny!