kittenrobotarmy
JOLLY COOPERATION
I never used SN so I'm not bummed out, but Nintendo shouldn't have shut down the whole service.
They aren't trying to be moral guardians of gaming. They are trying to protect their brand of kid and family-friendly gaming.They need to stop being the moral guardians of the gaming world it's ridiculous.
Nintendo clearly need to work on their parental controls. Or the parents do. No need to make the rest of us suffer. It's such an innocent piece of software.
Honestly after reading the notification about it, it's giving me the impression that graphic or sexual pictures were being sent over the program. Sure, kids are probably exposed to that kind of thing all the time, but it was also probably some minors doing the sending. Which, regardless of intent, having sexual images of minors can get you into trouble as a sex offender. (At least that's what the media led me to believe the last time I heard anything about it.)
And since parents don't seem to ever want to make their kids responsible for their actions, if they were to find such content on their children's video game system, you know they'd raise hell about it and bombard Nintendo with hate mail and threats of suing them/boycotting all their stuff. Not to mention the media hellfire that would come up because Nintendo, with it's squeaky clean child-friendly image, has a program that can be used to send graphic and mature content to minors. It's always the fault of the program designers, never the fault of the people abusing it, of course. 9_9
Nintendo pretty much HAD to shut it down. Because the only other solution I could think of to prevent the problems they had would have been a system where every single picture submitted to them would have to go through heavy screening to make sure it wasn't inappropriate, and can you imagine how annoying that would be? Send picture, wait for picture to get through the que in the screening process, much later, picture is sent! Or returned to you and telling you the picture you sent was too graphic and that if you do it again your usage of the feature would be revoked. That sounds pretty obnoxious to me.
I'm not defending the fact that Nintendo shut it down because they couldn't find a reasonable solution. I'm defending Nintendo's feelings that they had no choice BUT to shut it down because they couldn't find a reasonable solution. If they hadn't shut it down, they risked their business and image for allowing the behavior to continue. Because parents can't do their job and monitor what their kids do with their video game devices, and when they suddenly discover little Jimmy and Sarah have inappropriate content sent to them or sent out to others, it must be the fault of Nintendo, it couldn't be their fault for not keeping an eye on their precious, infallible angles. And most certainly it couldn't be their little angels' faults!
It's usually the most vocal groups who gets their points across, though they might not be always right. Instead of talking amongst ourselves of the disgusting poor decision Nintendo made to discontinue the service, we should contact Nintendo themselves.And since parents don't seem to ever want to make their kids responsible for their actions, if they were to find such content on their children's video game system, you know they'd raise hell about it and bombard Nintendo with hate mail and threats of suing them/boycotting all their stuff. Not to mention the media hellfire that would come up because Nintendo, with it's squeaky clean child-friendly image, has a program that can be used to send graphic and mature content to minors. It's always the fault of the program designers, never the fault of the people abusing it, of course. 9_9
Let me stop you there. The moment they, as a company, decide they should play big brother, is the moment they have lost. They can't possibility 'child-proof' a device or game that provides any sort of social interaction. What is stopping someone from making a lewd picture using the patterns in ACNL? What is stopping someone from harassing people with in-game chat? Or inappropriate pokemon names? What Nintendo can do instead is offer the option to child-proof by using parental controls, which is already there.Nintendo pretty much HAD to shut it down. Because the only other solution I could think...
It's no doubt they are trying to appease a certain group of people who purchase their product and games. Though if they are making more people upset by blocking such content, only then would they reconsider their decision. As of now I don't think there has been any update on this shutdown.I'm not defending the fact that Nintendo shut it down because they couldn't find a reasonable solution. I'm defending Nintendo's feelings that they had no choice BUT to shut it down because they couldn't find a reasonable solution. If they hadn't shut it down, they risked their business and image for allowing the behavior to continue. Because parents can't do their job and monitor what their kids do with their video game devices, and when they suddenly discover little Jimmy and Sarah have inappropriate content sent to them or sent out to others, it must be the fault of Nintendo, it couldn't be their fault for not keeping an eye on their precious, infallible angles. And most certainly it couldn't be their little angels' faults!
What's more likely at play here is Nintendo's conservatism, focus on children at the expense of everyone else, and fear.
Also,here's the full article about that.View attachment 16798
Disgusting.
At the same time, they should bring swapnote back. It's not the applications fault, it's certain users.
Here's a link since the pic is too small
http://gonintendo.com/?mode=viewstory&id=216348
Also,here's the full article about that.
http://kotaku.com/child-predators-were-using-nintendos-swapnote-service-1459304126/@lukeplunkett
All of that is truly disgusting ._. do you think they would ever bring it back?
If it was because of people sending crudely drawn...ermm...things, that was happening since the first DS where people would draw those things back and fourth to each other using picto-chat. I don't have a Wii-U, but I'm pretty sure they're still doing that.